These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38900178)

  • 1. Can the Velocity of a 1RM Hang Power Clean Be Used to Estimate a 1RM Hang High Pull?
    Suchomel TJ; Techmanski BS; Kissick CR; Comfort P
    J Strength Cond Res; 2024 Jul; 38(7):1321-1325. PubMed ID: 38900178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the Power Output Between the Hang Power Clean and Hang High Pull Across a Wide Range of Loads in Weightlifters.
    Takei S; Hirayama K; Okada J
    J Strength Cond Res; 2021 Feb; 35(Suppl 1):S84-S88. PubMed ID: 32149888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using Barbell Acceleration to Determine the 1 Repetition Maximum of the Jump Shrug.
    Techmanski BS; Kissick CR; Loturco I; Suchomel TJ
    J Strength Cond Res; 2024 Aug; 38(8):1486-1493. PubMed ID: 39072659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of various loads on the force-time characteristics of the hang high pull.
    Suchomel TJ; Beckham GK; Wright GA
    J Strength Cond Res; 2015 May; 29(5):1295-301. PubMed ID: 25426514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of load based on body mass percentage on peak power output in the hang power clean, hang high pull, and mid-thigh clean pull.
    Lopes Dos Santos M; Berton R; Jagodinsky AE; Torry MR; Lagally KM
    J Sports Med Phys Fitness; 2022 Apr; 62(4):457-466. PubMed ID: 34256535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Load Absorption Force-Time Characteristics Following the Second Pull of Weightlifting Derivatives.
    Suchomel TJ; Lake JP; Comfort P
    J Strength Cond Res; 2017 Jun; 31(6):1644-1652. PubMed ID: 28538316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mechanical Demands of the Hang Power Clean and Jump Shrug: A Joint-Level Perspective.
    Kipp K; Malloy PJ; Smith JC; Giordanelli MD; Kiely MT; Geiser CF; Suchomel TJ
    J Strength Cond Res; 2018 Feb; 32(2):466-474. PubMed ID: 27669182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Power-Time Curve Comparison between Weightlifting Derivatives.
    Suchomel TJ; Sole CJ
    J Sports Sci Med; 2017 Sep; 16(3):407-413. PubMed ID: 28912659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Comparison of Kinetic and Kinematic Variables During the Pull From the Knee and Hang Pull, Across Loads.
    Meechan D; McMahon JJ; Suchomel TJ; Comfort P
    J Strength Cond Res; 2020 Jul; 34(7):1819-1829. PubMed ID: 32282627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Force-Time-Curve Comparison Between Weight-Lifting Derivatives.
    Suchomel TJ; Sole CJ
    Int J Sports Physiol Perform; 2017 Apr; 12(4):431-439. PubMed ID: 27400372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of Expertise on Muscle Activity during the Hang Power Clean and Hang Power Snatch Compared to Snatch and Clean Pulls - An Explorative Analysis.
    Geisler S; Havers T; Isenmann E; Schulze J; Lourens LK; Nowak J; Held S; Haff GG
    J Sports Sci Med; 2023 Dec; 22(4):778-789. PubMed ID: 38045750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Training With Weightlifting Derivatives: The Effects of Force and Velocity Overload Stimuli.
    Suchomel TJ; McKeever SM; Comfort P
    J Strength Cond Res; 2020 Jul; 34(7):1808-1818. PubMed ID: 32398635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Test-retest reliability of barbell velocity during the free-weight bench-press exercise.
    Stock MS; Beck TW; DeFreitas JM; Dillon MA
    J Strength Cond Res; 2011 Jan; 25(1):171-7. PubMed ID: 21157383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparing Biomechanical Time Series Data During the Hang-Power Clean and Jump Shrug.
    Kipp K; Comfort P; Suchomel TJ
    J Strength Cond Res; 2021 Sep; 35(9):2389-2396. PubMed ID: 31009429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Kinetic comparison of the power development between power clean variations.
    Suchomel TJ; Wright GA; Kernozek TW; Kline DE
    J Strength Cond Res; 2014 Feb; 28(2):350-60. PubMed ID: 23689341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validity of Different Velocity-Based Methods and Repetitions-to-Failure Equations for Predicting the 1 Repetition Maximum During 2 Upper-Body Pulling Exercises.
    Pérez-Castilla A; Suzovic D; Domanovic A; Fernandes JFT; García-Ramos A
    J Strength Cond Res; 2021 Jul; 35(7):1800-1808. PubMed ID: 30741875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reliability, Validity, and Comparison of Barbell Velocity Measurement Devices during the Jump Shrug and Hang High Pull.
    Suchomel TJ; Techmanski BS; Kissick CR; Comfort P
    J Funct Morphol Kinesiol; 2023 Mar; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 36976132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Factors Related to Average Concentric Velocity of Four Barbell Exercises at Various Loads.
    Fahs CA; Blumkaitis JC; Rossow LM
    J Strength Cond Res; 2019 Mar; 33(3):597-605. PubMed ID: 30640305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of load and sex on kinematic and kinetic variables during the mid-thigh clean pull.
    Comfort P; Jones PA; Udall R
    Sports Biomech; 2015 Jun; 14(2):139-56. PubMed ID: 25896197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using the Load-Velocity Profile for Predicting the 1RM of the Hexagonal Barbell Deadlift Exercise.
    Lopes Dos Santos M; Mann JB; Berton R; Alvar BA; Lockie RG; Dawes JJ
    J Strength Cond Res; 2023 Jan; 37(1):220-223. PubMed ID: 36515609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.