These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38900526)

  • 1. Why are some individuals better at using negative attentional templates to suppress distractors? Exploration of interindividual differences in cognitive control efficiency.
    Chidharom M; Carlisle NB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2024 Aug; 50(8):808-818. PubMed ID: 38900526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Learned distractor rejection in the face of strong target guidance.
    Stilwell BT; Vecera SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Sep; 46(9):926-941. PubMed ID: 32391708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Expected distractor context biases the attentional template for target shapes.
    Lerebourg M; de Lange FP; Peelen MV
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2023 Sep; 49(9):1236-1255. PubMed ID: 37410402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Can templates-for-rejection suppress real-world affective objects in visual search?
    Brown CRH; Derakshan N
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 Aug; 31(4):1843-1855. PubMed ID: 38316718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Neurophysiological Measures of Proactive and Reactive Control in Negative Template Use.
    Chidharom M; Carlisle NB
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2023 Jul; 35(7):1063-1074. PubMed ID: 37052508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The allocation of resources in visual working memory and multiple attentional templates.
    Kerzel D; Witzel C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 May; 45(5):645-658. PubMed ID: 30920252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Probing early attention following negative and positive templates.
    Zhang Z; Gapelin N; Carlisle NB
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jun; 82(3):1166-1175. PubMed ID: 31650519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing recoding accounts of negative attentional templates using behavior and eye tracking.
    Zhang Z; Carlisle NB
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 Apr; 49(4):509-532. PubMed ID: 36548091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Proactive control processes in event-based prospective memory: Evidence from intraindividual variability and ex-Gaussian analyses.
    Ball BH; Brewer GA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 May; 44(5):793-811. PubMed ID: 29239624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Characterizing individual variation in the strategic use of attentional control.
    Irons JL; Leber AB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Oct; 44(10):1637-1654. PubMed ID: 29975099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Attentional set and explicit expectations of perceptual load determine flanker interference.
    Eayrs JO; Kukkonen N; Prutean N; Steendam ST; Boehler CN; Wiersema JR; Krebs RM; Notebaert W
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2024 Jul; 50(7):769-784. PubMed ID: 38722582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Activation of new attentional templates for real-world objects in visual search.
    Nako R; Smith TJ; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 May; 27(5):902-12. PubMed ID: 25321485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Distinct mechanisms of attentional suppression: exploration of trait factors underlying cued- and learned-suppression.
    Chidharom M; Carlisle NB
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2024 May; 9(1):26. PubMed ID: 38691325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visual search with varying versus consistent attentional templates: Effects on target template establishment, comparison, and guidance.
    Goldstein RR; Beck MR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1086-1102. PubMed ID: 29620379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Time Course of Target Template Activation Processes during Preparation for Visual Search.
    Grubert A; Eimer M
    J Neurosci; 2018 Oct; 38(44):9527-9538. PubMed ID: 30242053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Association between cue lead time and template-for-rejection effect.
    Tanda T; Kawahara JI
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Aug; 81(6):1880-1889. PubMed ID: 31114955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Learned suppression for multiple distractors in visual search.
    Won BY; Geng JJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1128-1141. PubMed ID: 29733673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Proactive suppression is an implicit process that cannot be summoned on demand.
    Hauck C; Ruthruff E; Lien MC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2024 Jun; 50(6):636-653. PubMed ID: 38619486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Involuntary attentional capture by task-irrelevant objects that match the search template for category detection in natural scenes.
    Reeder RR; van Zoest W; Peelen MV
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 May; 77(4):1070-80. PubMed ID: 25810159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Similar Quality of Visual Working Memory Representations between Negative and Positive Attentional Templates.
    Chidharom M; Zafarmand M; Carlisle NB
    J Cogn; 2024; 7(1):55. PubMed ID: 39035075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.