These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38900526)

  • 21. Feature-based statistical regularities of distractors modulate attentional capture.
    Stilwell BT; Bahle B; Vecera SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Mar; 45(3):419-433. PubMed ID: 30802131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Guidance of visual search by negative attentional templates depends on task demands.
    Kerzel D; Huynh Cong S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 Jun; 48(6):653-664. PubMed ID: 35446088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Contextual cueing improves attentional guidance, even when guidance is supposedly optimal.
    Harris AM; Remington RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 May; 43(5):926-940. PubMed ID: 28230395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Aging impairs reactive attentional control but not proactive distractor inhibition.
    Kim AJ; Senior J; Chu S; Mather M
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2024 Jul; 153(7):1938-1959. PubMed ID: 38780565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Neural Dynamics of Cognitive Control over Working Memory Capture of Attention.
    Whitehead PS; Ooi MM; Egner T; Woldorff MG
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2019 Jul; 31(7):1079-1090. PubMed ID: 30938591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. New templates interfere with existing templates depending on their respective priority in visual working memory.
    Huynh Cong S; Kerzel D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Nov; 46(11):1313-1327. PubMed ID: 32757589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Proactive suppression can be applied to multiple salient distractors in visual search.
    Drisdelle BL; Eimer M
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2023 Sep; 152(9):2504-2519. PubMed ID: 37126051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Overt attention in contextual cuing of visual search is driven by the attentional set, but not by the predictiveness of distractors.
    Beesley T; Hanafi G; Vadillo MA; Shanks DR; Livesey EJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 May; 44(5):707-721. PubMed ID: 29608077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Proactive control of affective distraction: Experience-based but not expectancy-based.
    Schmidts C; Foerster A; Kleinsorge T; Kunde W
    Cognition; 2020 Jan; 194():104072. PubMed ID: 31520864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Whatever you do, don't look at the...: Evaluating guidance by an exclusionary attentional template.
    Beck VM; Luck SJ; Hollingworth A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Apr; 44(4):645-662. PubMed ID: 29035075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Control strategy under pressure situations: performance pressure conditionally enhances proactive control.
    Liu Z; Tang R
    Psychol Res; 2024 Jun; 88(4):1115-1126. PubMed ID: 38459973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Contingent capture is weakened in search for multiple features from different dimensions.
    Biderman D; Biderman N; Zivony A; Lamy D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1974-1992. PubMed ID: 28425733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The guidance of attention by templates for rejection during visual search.
    Berggren N; Eimer M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Jan; 83(1):38-57. PubMed ID: 33206360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Switch hands! Mapping proactive and reactive cognitive control across the life span.
    Van Gerven PW; Hurks PP; Bovend'Eerdt TJ; Adam JJ
    Dev Psychol; 2016 Jun; 52(6):960-71. PubMed ID: 27124653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Benefits from negative templates in easy and difficult search depend on rapid distractor rejection and enhanced guidance.
    Zhang Z; Sahatdjian R; Carlisle NB
    Vision Res; 2022 Aug; 197():108031. PubMed ID: 35462088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Involuntary top-down control by search-irrelevant features: Visual working memory biases attention in an object-based manner.
    Foerster RM; Schneider WX
    Cognition; 2018 Mar; 172():37-45. PubMed ID: 29223864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Negative cues minimize visual search specificity effects.
    Phelps AM; Alexander RG; Schmidt J
    Vision Res; 2022 Jul; 196():108030. PubMed ID: 35313163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Zooming in on the cause of the perceptual load effect in the go/no-go paradigm.
    Chen Z; Cave KR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1072-87. PubMed ID: 26820251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Precueing imminent conflict does not override sequence-dependent interference adaptation.
    Alpay G; Goerke M; Stürmer B
    Psychol Res; 2009 Nov; 73(6):803-16. PubMed ID: 19034499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Failures in top-down control in schizophrenia revealed by patterns of saccadic eye movements.
    Bansal S; Robinson BM; Leonard CJ; Hahn B; Luck SJ; Gold JM
    J Abnorm Psychol; 2019 Jul; 128(5):415-422. PubMed ID: 31192637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.