These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38900724)

  • 1. Bubble reachers and uncivil discourse in polarized online public sphere.
    Kobellarz JK; Brocic M; Silver D; Silva TH
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(6):e0304564. PubMed ID: 38900724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ideology, communication and polarization.
    Kashima Y; Perfors A; Ferdinand V; Pattenden E
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2021 Apr; 376(1822):20200133. PubMed ID: 33612005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The social media discourse of engaged partisans is toxic even when politics are irrelevant.
    Mamakos M; Finkel EJ
    PNAS Nexus; 2023 Oct; 2(10):pgad325. PubMed ID: 37869481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Political science. Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook.
    Bakshy E; Messing S; Adamic LA
    Science; 2015 Jun; 348(6239):1130-2. PubMed ID: 25953820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Incivility in COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate Discourse and Moral Foundations: Natural Language Processing Approach.
    Tin J; Stevens H; Rasul ME; Taylor LD
    JMIR Form Res; 2023 Nov; 7():e50367. PubMed ID: 38019581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Where do cross-cutting discussions happen?: Identifying cross-cutting comments on YouTube videos of political vloggers and mainstream news outlets.
    Chae SW; Lee SH
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(5):e0302030. PubMed ID: 38809817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. (De)Politicizing Polyamory: Social Media Comments on Media Representations of Consensual Non-Monogamies.
    Cardoso D; Rosa A; da Silva MT
    Arch Sex Behav; 2021 May; 50(4):1325-1340. PubMed ID: 33977425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Partisan asymmetries in exposure to misinformation.
    Rao A; Morstatter F; Lerman K
    Sci Rep; 2022 Sep; 12(1):15671. PubMed ID: 36123387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Emotions and Incivility in Vaccine Mandate Discourse: Natural Language Processing Insights.
    Stevens H; Rasul ME; Oh YJ
    JMIR Infodemiology; 2022; 2(2):e37635. PubMed ID: 36188420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In-party love spreads more efficiently than out-party hate in online communities.
    Martin-Gutierrez S; Robles Morales JM; Torcal M; Losada JC; Benito RM
    Sci Rep; 2024 Jul; 14(1):15700. PubMed ID: 38977803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Neutral bots probe political bias on social media.
    Chen W; Pacheco D; Yang KC; Menczer F
    Nat Commun; 2021 Sep; 12(1):5580. PubMed ID: 34552073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Political polarization of news media and influencers on Twitter in the 2016 and 2020 US presidential elections.
    Flamino J; Galeazzi A; Feldman S; Macy MW; Cross B; Zhou Z; Serafino M; Bovet A; Makse HA; Szymanski BK
    Nat Hum Behav; 2023 Jun; 7(6):904-916. PubMed ID: 36914806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Partisan styles of self-presentation in U.S. Twitter bios.
    Essig L; DellaPosta D
    Sci Rep; 2024 Jan; 14(1):1077. PubMed ID: 38212630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Montagu Principle: Incivility decreases politicians' public approval, even with their political base.
    Frimer JA; Skitka LJ
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2018 Nov; 115(5):845-866. PubMed ID: 30124301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Understanding public opinion in debates over biomedical research: looking beyond political partisanship to focus on beliefs about science and society.
    Nisbet M; Markowitz EM
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e88473. PubMed ID: 24558393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Uncivil Reactions to Sexual Assault Online: Linguistic Features of News Reports Predict Discourse Incivility.
    Stevens H; Acic I; Taylor LD
    Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw; 2021 Dec; 24(12):815-821. PubMed ID: 34515520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How do social media feed algorithms affect attitudes and behavior in an election campaign?
    Guess AM; Malhotra N; Pan J; Barberá P; Allcott H; Brown T; Crespo-Tenorio A; Dimmery D; Freelon D; Gentzkow M; González-Bailón S; Kennedy E; Kim YM; Lazer D; Moehler D; Nyhan B; Rivera CV; Settle J; Thomas DR; Thorson E; Tromble R; Wilkins A; Wojcieszak M; Xiong B; de Jonge CK; Franco A; Mason W; Stroud NJ; Tucker JA
    Science; 2023 Jul; 381(6656):398-404. PubMed ID: 37498999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Depolarization of echo chambers by random dynamical nudge.
    Currin CB; Vera SV; Khaledi-Nasab A
    Sci Rep; 2022 Jun; 12(1):9234. PubMed ID: 35654942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tweeting From Left to Right: Is Online Political Communication More Than an Echo Chamber?
    Barberá P; Jost JT; Nagler J; Tucker JA; Bonneau R
    Psychol Sci; 2015 Oct; 26(10):1531-42. PubMed ID: 26297377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Who polarizes Twitter? Ideological polarization, partisan groups and strategic networked campaigning on Twitter during the 2017 and 2021 German Federal elections 'Bundestagswahlen'.
    Darius P
    Soc Netw Anal Min; 2022; 12(1):151. PubMed ID: 36246430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.