BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38902633)

  • 1. Prediction of 30-day in-hospital mortality in older UGIB patients using a simplified risk score and comparison with AIMS65 score.
    Xue Z; Che H; Xie D; Ren J; Si Q
    BMC Geriatr; 2024 Jun; 24(1):534. PubMed ID: 38902633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring approaches in predicting the risk of in-hospital death among emergency hospitalized patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a retrospective observational study in Nanjing, China.
    Gu L; Xu F; Yuan J
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2018 Jun; 18(1):98. PubMed ID: 29954332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford bleeding score and modified Glasgow-Blatchford bleeding score in predicting outcomes of upper gastrointestinal bleeding: An accuracy and calibration study.
    Akhila Arya PV; Thulaseedharan NK; Raj R; Unnikrishnan DC; Jacob A
    Indian J Gastroenterol; 2023 Aug; 42(4):496-504. PubMed ID: 37382854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of three risk scores to predict outcomes in upper gastrointestinal bleeding; modifying Glasgow-Blatchford with albumin.
    Shafaghi A; Gharibpoor F; Mahdipour Z; Samadani AA
    Rom J Intern Med; 2019 Dec; 57(4):322-333. PubMed ID: 31268861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Risk stratification in acute upper GI bleeding: comparison of the AIMS65 score with the Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring systems.
    Robertson M; Majumdar A; Boyapati R; Chung W; Worland T; Terbah R; Wei J; Lontos S; Angus P; Vaughan R
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Jun; 83(6):1151-60. PubMed ID: 26515955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Risk stratification in acute variceal bleeding: Comparison of the AIMS65 score to established upper gastrointestinal bleeding and liver disease severity risk stratification scoring systems in predicting mortality and rebleeding.
    Robertson M; Ng J; Abu Shawish W; Swaine A; Skardoon G; Huynh A; Deshpande S; Low ZY; Sievert W; Angus P
    Dig Endosc; 2020 Jul; 32(5):761-768. PubMed ID: 31863515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validation of a new risk score system for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Kim MS; Moon HS; Kwon IS; Park JH; Kim JS; Kang SH; Sung JK; Lee ES; Kim SH; Lee BS; Jeong HY
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):193. PubMed ID: 32552662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the AIMS65 score with the Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring systems for the prediction of the risk of in-hospital death among patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Lu X; Zhang X; Chen H
    Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 2020 Jun; 112(6):467-473. PubMed ID: 32379473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. AIMS65 scoring system is comparable to Glasgow-Blatchford score or Rockall score for prediction of clinical outcomes for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Kim MS; Choi J; Shin WC
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):136. PubMed ID: 31349816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A simple prediction score for in-hospital mortality in patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Matsuhashi T; Hatta W; Hikichi T; Fukuda S; Mikami T; Tatsuta T; Nakamura J; Abe Y; Onozato Y; Ogata Y; Masamune A; Ohyauchi M; Ito H; Hanabata N; Araki Y; Yanagita T; Imamura H; Tsuji T; Sugawara K; Horikawa Y; Ohara S; Kondo Y; Dohmen T; Kakuta Y; Nakamura T; Iijima K
    J Gastroenterol; 2021 Aug; 56(8):758-768. PubMed ID: 34143312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Scoring systems used to predict mortality in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the ED.
    Tang Y; Shen J; Zhang F; Zhou X; Tang Z; You T
    Am J Emerg Med; 2018 Jan; 36(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 28673695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of the Glasgow-Blatchford and AIMS65 scoring systems for risk stratification in upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department.
    Yaka E; Yılmaz S; Doğan NÖ; Pekdemir M
    Acad Emerg Med; 2015 Jan; 22(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 25556538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validation of a Machine Learning Model That Outperforms Clinical Risk Scoring Systems for Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
    Shung DL; Au B; Taylor RA; Tay JK; Laursen SB; Stanley AJ; Dalton HR; Ngu J; Schultz M; Laine L
    Gastroenterology; 2020 Jan; 158(1):160-167. PubMed ID: 31562847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of various prognostic scores in variceal and non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: A prospective cohort study.
    Rout G; Sharma S; Gunjan D; Kedia S; Nayak B; Shalimar
    Indian J Gastroenterol; 2019 Apr; 38(2):158-166. PubMed ID: 30830583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prospective Comparison of the AIMS65 Score, Glasgow-Blatchford Score, and Rockall Score for Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Variceal and Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
    Chang A; Ouejiaraphant C; Akarapatima K; Rattanasupa A; Prachayakul V
    Clin Endosc; 2021 Mar; 54(2):211-221. PubMed ID: 32668528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prediction of adverse outcomes using non-endoscopic scoring systems in patients over 80 years of age who present with the upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department.
    Bardakçı O; Sıddıkoğlu D; Akdur G; Şimşek G; Atalay Ü; Das M; Akdur O; Beyazit Y
    Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg; 2022 Jan; 28(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 34967427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. ABC score: a new risk score that accurately predicts mortality in acute upper and lower gastrointestinal bleeding: an international multicentre study.
    Laursen SB; Oakland K; Laine L; Bieber V; Marmo R; Redondo-Cerezo E; Dalton HR; Ngu J; Schultz M; Soncini M; Gralnek I; Jairath V; Murray IA; Stanley AJ
    Gut; 2021 Apr; 70(4):707-716. PubMed ID: 32723845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical Application of AIMS65 Scores to Predict Outcomes in Patients with Upper Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage.
    Thandassery RB; Sharma M; John AK; Al-Ejji KM; Wani H; Sultan K; Al-Mohannadi M; Yakoob R; Derbala M; Al-Dweik N; Butt MT; Al-Kaabi SR
    Clin Endosc; 2015 Sep; 48(5):380-4. PubMed ID: 26473120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The AIMS65 score compared with the Glasgow-Blatchford score in predicting outcomes in upper GI bleeding.
    Hyett BH; Abougergi MS; Charpentier JP; Kumar NL; Brozovic S; Claggett BL; Travis AC; Saltzman JR
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Apr; 77(4):551-7. PubMed ID: 23357496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. MAP(ASH): A new scoring system for the prediction of intervention and mortality in upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Redondo-Cerezo E; Vadillo-Calles F; Stanley AJ; Laursen S; Laine L; Dalton HR; Ngu JH; Schultz M; Jiménez-Rosales R
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2020 Jan; 35(1):82-89. PubMed ID: 31359521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.