These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38903012)

  • 1. Using Separate Single-Outcome Risk Presentations Instead of Integrated Multioutcome Formats Improves Comprehension in Discrete Choice Experiments.
    Wallace MJ; Weissler EH; Yang JC; Brotzman L; Corriere MA; Secemsky EA; Sutphin J; Johnson FR; Marcos Gonzalez J; Tarver ME; Saha A; Chen AL; Gebben DJ; Malone M; Farb A; Babalola O; Rorer EM; Zikmund-Fisher BJ; Reed SD
    Med Decis Making; 2024 Aug; 44(6):649-660. PubMed ID: 38903012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol.
    Perrenoud B; Velonaki VS; Bodenmann P; Ramelet AS
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Oct; 13(10):82-94. PubMed ID: 26571285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does Animation Improve Comprehension of Risk Information in Patients with Low Health Literacy? A Randomized Trial.
    Housten AJ; Kamath GR; Bevers TB; Cantor SB; Dixon N; Hite A; Kallen MA; Leal VB; Li L; Volk RJ
    Med Decis Making; 2020 Jan; 40(1):17-28. PubMed ID: 31795820
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The impact of home care nurses' numeracy and graph literacy on comprehension of visual display information: implications for dashboard design.
    Dowding D; Merrill JA; Onorato N; Barrón Y; Rosati RJ; Russell D
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2018 Feb; 25(2):175-182. PubMed ID: 28460091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How Do People Process Different Representations of Statistical Information? Insights into Cognitive Effort, Representational Inconsistencies, and Individual Differences.
    Tiede KE; Gaissmaier W
    Med Decis Making; 2023; 43(7-8):803-820. PubMed ID: 37842816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparing the impact of an icon array versus a bar graph on preference and understanding of risk information: Results from an online, randomized study.
    Scalia P; Schubbe DC; Lu ES; Durand MA; Frascara J; Noel G; O'Malley AJ; Elwyn G
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(7):e0253644. PubMed ID: 34297713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Risk Ladder, Table, or Bulleted List? Identifying Formats That Effectively Communicate Personalized Risk and Risk Reduction Information for Multiple Diseases.
    Waters EA; Maki J; Liu Y; Ackermann N; Carter CR; Dart H; Bowen DJ; Cameron LD; Colditz GA
    Med Decis Making; 2021 Jan; 41(1):74-88. PubMed ID: 33106087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Lure of Beauty: People Select Representations of Statistical Information Largely Based on Attractiveness, Not Comprehensibility.
    Gaissmaier W; Tiede KE; Garcia-Retamero R
    Med Decis Making; 2023; 43(7-8):774-788. PubMed ID: 37872798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Numbers matter to informed patient choices: a randomized design across age and numeracy levels.
    Peters E; Hart PS; Tusler M; Fraenkel L
    Med Decis Making; 2014 May; 34(4):430-42. PubMed ID: 24246563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An Exploratory Application of Eye-Tracking Methods in a Discrete Choice Experiment.
    Vass C; Rigby D; Tate K; Stewart A; Payne K
    Med Decis Making; 2018 Aug; 38(6):658-672. PubMed ID: 30074879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relevance of graph literacy in the development of patient-centered communication tools.
    Nayak JG; Hartzler AL; Macleod LC; Izard JP; Dalkin BM; Gore JL
    Patient Educ Couns; 2016 Mar; 99(3):448-454. PubMed ID: 26481910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Graph literacy matters: Examining the association between graph literacy, health literacy, and numeracy in a Medicaid eligible population.
    Durand MA; Yen RW; O'Malley J; Elwyn G; Mancini J
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(11):e0241844. PubMed ID: 33175891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Communicating global cardiovascular risk: are icon arrays better than numerical estimates in improving understanding, recall and perception of risk?
    Ruiz JG; Andrade AD; Garcia-Retamero R; Anam R; Rodriguez R; Sharit J
    Patient Educ Couns; 2013 Dec; 93(3):394-402. PubMed ID: 23916416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Presenting Numeric Information with Percentages and Descriptive Risk Labels: A Randomized Trial.
    Sinayev A; Peters E; Tusler M; Fraenkel L
    Med Decis Making; 2015 Nov; 35(8):937-47. PubMed ID: 25952743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Health Numeracy and Relative Risk Comprehension in Perioperative Patients and Physicians.
    Hayter RR; Hess AS
    Anesth Analg; 2020 Aug; 131(2):579-585. PubMed ID: 32304457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Communicating risk information: the influence of graphical display format on quantitative information perception-Accuracy, comprehension and preferences.
    Price M; Cameron R; Butow P
    Patient Educ Couns; 2007 Dec; 69(1-3):121-8. PubMed ID: 17905553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Icon Arrays for Medical Risk Communication: Do Icon Type and Color Influence Cardiovascular Risk Perception and Recall?
    Blase R; Meis-Harris J; Weltermann B; Dohle S
    Med Decis Making; 2024 Aug; 44(6):661-673. PubMed ID: 39056311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of Tabular and Icon Fact Box Formats on Comprehension of Benefits and Harms of Prostate Cancer Screening: A Randomized Trial.
    McDowell M; Gigerenzer G; Wegwarth O; Rebitschek FG
    Med Decis Making; 2019 Jan; 39(1):41-56. PubMed ID: 30799691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Presenting decision-relevant numerical information to Dutch women aged 50-70 with varying levels of health literacy: Case example of adjuvant systemic therapy for breast cancer.
    van Strien-Knippenberg IS; Timmermans DRM; Engelhardt EG; Konings IRHM; Damman OC
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(9):e0309668. PubMed ID: 39226280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.