These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38903954)
1. Does online high-volume hemodiafiltration offer greater efficiency and sustainability compared with high-flux hemodialysis? A detailed simulation analysis anchored in real-world data. Canaud B; Gagel A; Peters A; Maierhofer A; Stuard S Clin Kidney J; 2024 Jun; 17(6):sfae147. PubMed ID: 38903954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Super high-flux hemodialysis provides comparable effectiveness with high-volume postdilution online hemodiafiltration in removing protein-bound and middle-molecule uremic toxins: A prospective cross-over randomized controlled trial. Thammathiwat T; Tiranathanagul K; Limjariyakul M; Chariyavilaskul P; Takkavatakarn K; Susantitaphong P; Meesangnin S; Wittayalertpanya S; Praditpornsilpa K; Eiam-Ong S Ther Apher Dial; 2021 Feb; 25(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 32356365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical Performance Assessment of CorDiax Filters in Hemodialysis and Hemodiafiltration. Potier J; Bowry S; Canaud B Contrib Nephrol; 2017; 189():237-245. PubMed ID: 27951574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantitative assessment of sodium mass removal using ionic dialysance and sodium gradient as a proxy tool: Comparison of high-flux hemodialysis versus online hemodiafiltration. Rodriguez A; Morena M; Bargnoux AS; Chenine L; Leray-Moragues H; Cristol JP; Canaud B Artif Organs; 2021 Aug; 45(8):E280-E292. PubMed ID: 33507535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Clinical Significance of Intermittent Infusion Hemodiafiltration Using Backfiltration of Ultrapure Dialysis Fluid Compared to Hemodialysis: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Crossover Trial. Mineshima M; Takahashi S; Tomo T; Kawanishi H; Kawaguchi H; Minakuchi J; Nakanishi T; Sato T; Nitta K; Tsuchiya K; Masakane I; Itami N Blood Purif; 2019; 48(4):368-381. PubMed ID: 31311018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Solute Removal Properties Between High-Efficient Dialysis Modalities in Low Blood Flow Rate. Maduell F; Broseta JJ; Rodas L; Montagud-Marrahi E; Rodriguez-Espinosa D; Hermida E; Arias-Guillén M; Fontseré N; Vera M; Gómez M; González B; Rico N Ther Apher Dial; 2020 Aug; 24(4):387-392. PubMed ID: 31583845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Determining factors for hemodiafiltration to equal or exceed the performance of expanded hemodialysis. Maduell F; Broseta JJ; Gómez M; Racionero P; Montagud-Marrahi E; Rodas L; Arias-Guillén M; Fontseré N; Vera M; Rico N Artif Organs; 2020 Oct; 44(10):E448-E458. PubMed ID: 32279348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mixed predilution and postdilution online hemodiafiltration compared with the traditional infusion modes. Pedrini LA; De Cristofaro V; Pagliari B; Samà F Kidney Int; 2000 Nov; 58(5):2155-65. PubMed ID: 11044237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative efficacy between hemodialysis using super high-flux dialyzer with hemoperfusion and high-volume postdilution online hemodiafiltration in removing protein bound and middle molecule uremic toxins: A cross-over randomized controlled trial. Tiranathanagul K; Khemnark N; Takkavatakarn K; Limjariyakul M; Mahatanan N; Chariyavilaskul P; Wittayalertpanya S; Susantitaphong P; Eiam-Ong S Artif Organs; 2022 May; 46(5):775-785. PubMed ID: 35028951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. High-permeability alternatives to current dialyzers performing both high-flux hemodialysis and postdilution online hemodiafiltration. Maduell F; Rodas L; Broseta JJ; Gómez M; Xipell Font M; Molina A; Montagud-Marrahi E; Guillén E; Arias-Guillén M; Fontseré N; Vera Rivera M; Rico N Artif Organs; 2019 Oct; 43(10):1014-1021. PubMed ID: 31038748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical evaluation of internal hemodiafiltration (iHDF): a diffusive-convective technique performed with internal filtration enhanced high-flux dialyzers. Lucchi L; Fiore GB; Guadagni G; Perrone S; Malaguti V; Caruso F; Fumero R; Albertazzi A Int J Artif Organs; 2004 May; 27(5):414-9. PubMed ID: 15202820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. On-line hemodiafiltration with pre- and postdilution: a comparison of efficacy. Ahrenholz P; Winkler RE; Ramlow W; Tiess M; Müller W Int J Artif Organs; 1997 Feb; 20(2):81-90. PubMed ID: 9093885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Matching efficacy of online hemodiafiltration in simple hemodialysis mode. Krieter DH; Hunn E; Morgenroth A; Lemke HD; Wanner C Artif Organs; 2008 Dec; 32(12):903-9. PubMed ID: 19133017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Evolution and physical principles of convection-based dialysis treatment]. David S G Ital Nefrol; 2012; 29 Suppl 55():S3-11. PubMed ID: 22723138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Online hemodiafiltration versus acetate-free biofiltration: a prospective crossover study. Ding F; Ahrenholz P; Winkler RE; Ramlow W; Tiess M; Michelsen A; Pätow W Artif Organs; 2002 Feb; 26(2):169-80. PubMed ID: 11879247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Osteocalcin and myoglobin removal in on-line hemodiafiltration versus low- and high-flux hemodialysis. Maduell F; Navarro V; Cruz MC; Torregrosa E; Garcia D; Simon V; Ferrero JA Am J Kidney Dis; 2002 Sep; 40(3):582-9. PubMed ID: 12200811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Thermal effects and blood pressure response during postdilution hemodiafiltration and hemodialysis: the effect of amount of replacement fluid and dialysate temperature. Sande FMV; Kooman JP; Konings CJ; Leunissen KML J Am Soc Nephrol; 2001 Sep; 12(9):1916-1920. PubMed ID: 11518785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]