These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38904564)

  • 1. Evaluation of the accuracy of automated tooth segmentation of intraoral scans using artificial intelligence-based software packages.
    Yacout YM; Eid FY; Tageldin MA; Kassem HE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38904564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Virtual bracket removal: a comparative assessment of different software packages.
    Gamil H; Marzouk E; Zaher A
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Jul; 24(1):770. PubMed ID: 38982396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The accuracy of a 3-D laser scanner for crown width measurements.
    Nouri M; Massudi R; Bagheban AA; Azimi S; Fereidooni F
    Aust Orthod J; 2009 May; 25(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 19634463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Discrepancies in the occlusal devices designed by an experienced dental laboratory technician and by 2 artificial intelligence-based automatic programs.
    Kois JC; Zeitler JM; Barmak AB; Yilmaz B; Gómez-Polo M; Revilla-León M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Oct; ():. PubMed ID: 37798183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantifying maxillary anterior tooth movement in digital orthodontics: Does the choice of the superimposition software matter?
    Adel SM; Vaid NR; El-Harouni N; Kassem H; Park JH; Zaher AR
    J World Fed Orthod; 2023 Oct; 12(5):187-196. PubMed ID: 37625927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of root position during orthodontic treatment via multiple intraoral scans with automated registration technology.
    Hu X; Zhao Y; Yang C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2023 Aug; 164(2):285-292. PubMed ID: 37178106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mesiodistal angulation and faciolingual inclination of each whole tooth in 3-dimensional space in patients with near-normal occlusion.
    Tong H; Kwon D; Shi J; Sakai N; Enciso R; Sameshima GT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 May; 141(5):604-17. PubMed ID: 22554755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of different span lengths with different total occlusal convergences on the accuracy of intraoral scanners.
    Yehia A; Abo El Fadl A; El Sergany O; Ebeid K
    J Prosthodont; 2024 Mar; 33(3):252-258. PubMed ID: 36988154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A digital method to predict the mesiodistal widths of canines and premolars in an Egyptian sample.
    Ibrahim IA; Elkateb MA; Wahba NA; El Harouny NM
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2011; 35(4):421-7. PubMed ID: 22046703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Importance of the Maxillary and Mandibular Incisors in Predicting the Canines and Premolars Crown Widths.
    Al-Khannaq MRA; Nahidh M; Al-Dulaimy DA
    Int J Dent; 2022; 2022():1551413. PubMed ID: 35761966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparing 3D Tooth Movement When Implementing the Same Virtual Setup on Different Software Packages.
    Dhingra A; Palomo JM; Stefanovic N; Eliliwi M; Elshebiny T
    J Clin Med; 2022 Sep; 11(18):. PubMed ID: 36142998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Frequency of missing teeth and reduction of mesiodistal tooth width in Japanese patients with tooth agenesis.
    Higashihori N; Takada JI; Katayanagi M; Takahashi Y; Moriyama K
    Prog Orthod; 2018 Aug; 19(1):30. PubMed ID: 30123921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Can we estimate root axis using a 3-dimensional tooth model via lingual-surface intraoral scanning?
    Lim SW; Park H; Lim SY; Choo HH; Baek SH; Hwang HS; Cho JH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2020 Nov; 158(5):e99-e109. PubMed ID: 33131571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of orthodontic measurements on dental plaster casts and 3D scans.
    Radeke J; von der Wense C; Lapatki BG
    J Orofac Orthop; 2014 Jul; 75(4):264-74. PubMed ID: 24996855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy and efficiency of automatic tooth segmentation in digital dental models using deep learning.
    Im J; Kim JY; Yu HS; Lee KJ; Choi SH; Kim JH; Ahn HK; Cha JY
    Sci Rep; 2022 Jun; 12(1):9429. PubMed ID: 35676524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Anatomic crown width/length ratios of unworn and worn maxillary teeth in white subjects.
    Magne P; Gallucci GO; Belser UC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 May; 89(5):453-61. PubMed ID: 12806322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of accuracy of 3 intraoral scanners: A single-blinded in vitro study.
    Michelinakis G; Apostolakis D; Tsagarakis A; Kourakis G; Pavlakis E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Nov; 124(5):581-588. PubMed ID: 31870614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How well does Invisalign work? A prospective clinical study evaluating the efficacy of tooth movement with Invisalign.
    Kravitz ND; Kusnoto B; BeGole E; Obrez A; Agran B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jan; 135(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 19121497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of additional reference objects on accuracy of five intraoral scanners in partially and completely edentulous jaws: An in vitro study.
    Rutkūnas V; Gedrimienė A; Al-Haj Husain N; Pletkus J; Barauskis D; Jegelevičius D; Özcan M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jul; 130(1):111-118. PubMed ID: 34799084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of dental fillings and tooth type on the performance of a novel artificial intelligence-driven tool for automatic tooth segmentation on CBCT images - A validation study.
    Fontenele RC; Gerhardt MDN; Pinto JC; Van Gerven A; Willems H; Jacobs R; Freitas DQ
    J Dent; 2022 Apr; 119():104069. PubMed ID: 35183696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.