116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38904826)
1. Effect of Digital Noise Reduction in Hearing Aids on Speech Intelligibility in Both Quiet and Noisy Environments.
Deniz B; Gülmez ZD; Kara H; Kara E
Noise Health; 2024 Apr-Jun 01; 26(121):220-225. PubMed ID: 38904826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interactions Between Digital Noise Reduction and Reverberation: Acoustic and Behavioral Effects.
Reinhart P; Zahorik P; Souza P
J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Jan; 31(1):17-29. PubMed ID: 31267958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Development and evaluation of the Turkish matrix sentence test.
Zokoll MA; Fidan D; Türkyılmaz D; Hochmuth S; Ergenç İ; Sennaroğlu G; Kollmeier B
Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():51-61. PubMed ID: 26443486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Effects of Signal to Noise Ratio, T60 , Wide-Dynamic Range Compression Speed, and Digital Noise Reduction in a Virtual Restaurant Setting.
Ellis GM; Crukley J; Souza PE
Ear Hear; 2024 May-Jun 01; 45(3):760-774. PubMed ID: 38254265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Speech intelligibility benefits of hearing AIDS at various input levels.
Kuk F; Lau CC; Korhonen P; Crose B
J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Mar; 26(3):275-88. PubMed ID: 25751695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of SNR, masker type and noise reduction processing on sentence recognition performance and listening effort as indicated by the pupil dilation response.
Ohlenforst B; Wendt D; Kramer SE; Naylor G; Zekveld AA; Lunner T
Hear Res; 2018 Aug; 365():90-99. PubMed ID: 29779607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Strategies of hearing aids fitting for improving speech recognition in noisy environments].
Boboshko MY; Berdnikova IP; Korotkov YV; Maltseva NV
Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2021; 86(2):28-32. PubMed ID: 33929148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Effects of Nonlinear Frequency Compression and Digital Noise Reduction on Word Recognition and Satisfaction Ratings in Noise in Adult Hearing Aid Users.
Plyler PN; Tardy B; Hedrick M
J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Feb; 30(2):103-114. PubMed ID: 30461384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of Adaptive Noise Management Technologies for School-Age Children with Hearing Loss.
Wolfe J; Duke M; Schafer E; Jones C; Rakita L
J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 May; 28(5):415-435. PubMed ID: 28534732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Do you hear the noise? The German matrix sentence test with a fixed noise level in subjects with normal hearing and hearing impairment.
Wardenga N; Batsoulis C; Wagener KC; Brand T; Lenarz T; Maier H
Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():71-9. PubMed ID: 26555195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Functional outcomes for speech-in-noise intelligibility of NAL-NL2 and DSL v.5 prescriptive fitting rules in hearing aid users.
Portelli D; Loteta S; Ciodaro F; Salvago P; Galletti C; Freni L; Alberti G
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Jun; 281(6):3227-3235. PubMed ID: 38546852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Investigation of Extended Bandwidth Hearing Aid Amplification on Speech Intelligibility and Sound Quality in Adults with Mild-to-Moderate Hearing Loss.
Seeto A; Searchfield GD
J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Mar; 29(3):243-254. PubMed ID: 29488874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Large-scale training to increase speech intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners in novel noises.
Chen J; Wang Y; Yoho SE; Wang D; Healy EW
J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):2604. PubMed ID: 27250154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pediatric normative data for a novel and fast speech perception test in noise.
Gambacorta V; Stivalini D; Faralli M; Lapenna R; Della Volpe A; Malerba P; Di Nardo W; Di Cesare T; Orzan E; Ricci G
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 May; 180():111928. PubMed ID: 38593717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of hearing aid technologies on listening in an automobile.
Wu YH; Stangl E; Bentler RA; Stanziola RW
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jun; 24(6):474-85. PubMed ID: 23886425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effects of selective consonant amplification on sentence recognition in noise by hearing-impaired listeners.
Saripella R; Loizou PC; Thibodeau L; Alford JA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):3028-37. PubMed ID: 22087930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Speech intelligibility in noisy environments with one- and two-microphone hearing aids.
Wouters J; Litière L; van Wieringen A
Audiology; 1999; 38(2):91-8. PubMed ID: 10206518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of Hearing Loss and Fast-Acting Compression on Amplitude Modulation Perception and Speech Intelligibility.
Wiinberg A; Jepsen ML; Epp B; Dau T
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):45-54. PubMed ID: 29668566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improvements in speech intelligibility in quiet and in noise produced by two-channel compression hearing aids.
Moore BC; Laurence RF; Wright D
Br J Audiol; 1985 Aug; 19(3):175-87. PubMed ID: 4063555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Adaptive noise suppression for a dual-microphone hearing aid.
Wouters J; Berghe JV; Maj JB
Int J Audiol; 2002 Oct; 41(7):401-7. PubMed ID: 12403608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
