These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38906456)
1. Effect of postpolymerization time and atmosphere on surface properties and biofilm formation in additively manufactured resins for definitive restorations. Kim HT; Jo YH; Jee EB; Yoon HI; Yilmaz B J Dent; 2024 Aug; 147():105143. PubMed ID: 38906456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mechanical properties, cytotoxicity, and protein adsorption of three-dimensionally printable hybrid resin containing zwitterionic polymer and silicate-based composites for dental restorations. Kim HT; Çakmak G; Lee YH; Jo YH; Yoon HI; Yilmaz B J Dent; 2024 Aug; 147():105134. PubMed ID: 38885733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of barium silicate on mechanical properties, transmittance, and protein adsorption of resin for additive manufacturing containing zwitterionic polymer. Dönmez MB; Kim HT; Lee YH; Jo YH; Yoon HI; Yilmaz B J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Aug; 132(2):465.e1-465.e8. PubMed ID: 38890060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bacterial adhesion on direct and indirect dental restorative composite resins: An in vitro study on a natural biofilm. Derchi G; Vano M; Barone A; Covani U; Diaspro A; Salerno M J Prosthet Dent; 2017 May; 117(5):669-676. PubMed ID: 27881324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of polishing technique and coffee thermal cycling on the surface roughness and color stability of additively and subtractively manufactured resins used for definitive restorations. Çakmak G; Oosterveen-Rüegsegger AL; Akay C; Schimmel M; Yilmaz B; Donmez MB J Prosthodont; 2024 Jun; 33(5):467-474. PubMed ID: 37421940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Synthesis and application of triclosan methacrylate monomer in resin composites. de Paula AB; Taparelli JR; Alonso RCB; Innocentini-Mei LH; Puppin-Rontani RM Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Feb; 23(2):965-974. PubMed ID: 29911287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of biofilm formation on acrylic resins used to fabricate dental temporary restorations with the use of 3D printing technology. Mazurek-Popczyk J; Nowicki A; Arkusz K; Pałka Ł; Zimoch-Korzycka A; Baldy-Chudzik K BMC Oral Health; 2022 Oct; 22(1):442. PubMed ID: 36229871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biofilm-induced changes to the composite surface. Nedeljkovic I; De Munck J; Ungureanu AA; Slomka V; Bartic C; Vananroye A; Clasen C; Teughels W; Van Meerbeek B; Van Landuyt KL J Dent; 2017 Aug; 63():36-43. PubMed ID: 28554609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of curing time, overlay material and thickness on three light-curing composites used for luting indirect composite restorations. D'Arcangelo C; De Angelis F; Vadini M; Carluccio F; Vitalone LM; D'Amario M J Adhes Dent; 2012 Aug; 14(4):377-84. PubMed ID: 22282760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Surface roughness and shear bond strength to composite resin of additively manufactured interim restorative material with different printing orientations. Nasiry Khanlar L; Revilla-León M; Barmak AB; Ikeda M; Alsandi Q; Tagami J; Zandinejad A J Prosthet Dent; 2023 May; 129(5):788-795. PubMed ID: 34602276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fabrication trueness and marginal quality of additively manufactured resin-based definitive laminate veneers with different restoration thicknesses. Çakmak G; Donmez MB; Yılmaz D; Yoon HI; Kahveci Ç; Abou-Ayash S; Yilmaz B J Dent; 2024 May; 144():104941. PubMed ID: 38490323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of matrix and filler fraction on biofilm formation on the surface of experimental resin-based composites. Ionescu A; Brambilla E; Wastl DS; Giessibl FJ; Cazzaniga G; Schneider-Feyrer S; Hahnel S J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2015 Jan; 26(1):5372. PubMed ID: 25604698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vitro biofilm formation on resin-based composites after different finishing and polishing procedures. Cazzaniga G; Ottobelli M; Ionescu AC; Paolone G; Gherlone E; Ferracane JL; Brambilla E J Dent; 2017 Dec; 67():43-52. PubMed ID: 28750776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Surface roughness of different types of resin composites after artificial aging procedures: an in vitro study. Biçer Z; Yaman BC; Çeliksöz Ö; Tepe H BMC Oral Health; 2024 Aug; 24(1):876. PubMed ID: 39095862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of different resin-based restorative materials on mutans streptococci adhesion. An in vitro study. Osorio E; Osorio R; Toledano M; Quevedo-Sarmiento J; Ruiz-Bravo A Am J Dent; 2010 Oct; 23(5):275-8. PubMed ID: 21207795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of printing orientation and artificial ageing on martens hardness and indentation modulus of 3D printed restorative resin materials. Mudhaffer S; Althagafi R; Haider J; Satterthwaite J; Silikas N Dent Mater; 2024 Jul; 40(7):1003-1014. PubMed ID: 38735775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of different adhesion strategies on bond strength of resin composite to composite-dentin complex. Özcan M; Pekkan G Oper Dent; 2013; 38(1):63-72. PubMed ID: 22812912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]