114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38906569)
21. Finite element analysis of 3D-printed personalized titanium plates for mandibular angle fracture.
Li Y; Li H; Lai Q; Xue R; Zhu K; Deng Y
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2023 Jan; 26(1):78-89. PubMed ID: 35587215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Mechanical stability of 2-plate versus 4-plate osteosynthesis in advancement Le Fort I osteotomy. An in vitro study.
Pozzer L; Olate S; Cavalieri-Pereira L; Navarro P; de Albergaría Barbosa JR
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Feb; 118(1):2-4. PubMed ID: 28330569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Stability and morbidity of Le Fort I osteotomy with bioresorbable fixation: a randomized controlled trial.
Cheung LK; Yip IH; Chow RL
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Mar; 37(3):232-41. PubMed ID: 18022349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Biomechanical analysis of titanium fixation plates and screws in sagittal split ramus osteotomies.
Atik F; Atac MS; Özkan A; Kılınc Y; Arslan M
Niger J Clin Pract; 2016; 19(1):140-4. PubMed ID: 26755233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Finite element analysis of bone stress after SARPE.
de Assis DS; Xavier TA; Noritomi PY; Gonçales ES
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Jan; 72(1):167.e1-7. PubMed ID: 23945516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Biomechanical evaluation of sagittal maxillary internal distraction osteogenesis in unilateral cleft lip and palate patient and noncleft patients: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Olmez S; Dogan S; Pekedis M; Yildiz H
Angle Orthod; 2014 Sep; 84(5):815-24. PubMed ID: 24552304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Biomechanical evaluation of different fixation systems after Le Fort I osteotomy in polyurethane models of unilateral clefts.
Esen A; Isik K; Saglam H; Ozdemir YB; Dolanmaz D
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Sep; 54(7):757-61. PubMed ID: 27182011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Finite element analysis comparison of Type 42A2 fracture fixed with external titanium alloy locking plate and traditional external fixation frame.
Fang S; Zhang L; Yang Y; Wang Y; Guo J; Mi L
J Orthop Surg Res; 2023 Oct; 18(1):815. PubMed ID: 37907959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A customized fixation plate with novel structure designed by topological optimization for mandibular angle fracture based on finite element analysis.
Liu YF; Fan YY; Jiang XF; Baur DA
Biomed Eng Online; 2017 Nov; 16(1):131. PubMed ID: 29141673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of different fixation methods following sagittal split ramus osteotomies using three-dimensional finite elements analysis. Part 1: advancement surgery-posterior loading.
Erkmen E; Simşek B; Yücel E; Kurt A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Jul; 34(5):551-8. PubMed ID: 16053877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Finite element analysis of the use of two new types of internal fixation for acetabular fractures.
Lv G; Chen X; Wu H; Wu G; Huang Y; Huang G
J Orthop Surg Res; 2023 Nov; 18(1):841. PubMed ID: 37936217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparative evaluation of different fixation techniques for sagittal split ramus osteotomy in 10 mm advancements. Part two: Finite element analysis.
Sigua-Rodriguez EA; Caldas RA; Goulart DR; Hemerson de Moraes P; Olate S; Ricardo Barão VA; Ricardo de Albergaria-Barbosa J
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 Jul; 47(7):1015-1019. PubMed ID: 30718216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of the postoperative stability after repositioning of the maxilla with Le Fort I osteotomy using four- versus two-plate fixation.
Beyler E; Altıparmak N; Bayram B
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 Apr; 122(2):156-161. PubMed ID: 32442634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Stress and displacement between maxillary protraction with miniplates placed at the infrazygomatic crest and the lateral nasal wall: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Lee NK; Baek SH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Mar; 141(3):345-351. PubMed ID: 22381495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Individualized Surgical Templates and Titanium Microplates for Le Fort I Osteotomy by Computer-Aided Design and Computer-Aided Manufacturing.
He W; Tian K; Xie X; Wang X; Li Y; Wang X; Li Z
J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Sep; 26(6):1877-81. PubMed ID: 26221851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Does fixation method affects temporomandibular joints after mandibular advancement?
Ureturk EU; Apaydin A
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Jun; 46(6):923-931. PubMed ID: 29724535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Fixation Methods for Mandibular Advancement and Their Effects on Temporomandibular Joint: A Finite Element Analysis Study.
Demircan S; Uretürk EU; Apaydın A; Şen S
Biomed Res Int; 2020; 2020():2810763. PubMed ID: 32185199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparative evaluation of stress distribution and transverse displacement of novel designs of miniplates for sagittal split ramus osteotomy in 10 mm advancements: a finite element analysis.
Anlar H; Hasanoglu Erbasar GN; Konarılı FN; Orhan M
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Nov; 60(9):1266-1272. PubMed ID: 36055864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [A preliminary study of three-dimensional printed porous titanium plate integrated implant for the repair of comminuted acetabular posterior wall fracture with bone defect].
Zhang YC; Li JJ; Hou WT; Zhang HF; Liu JH
Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2019 May; 32(5):469-474. PubMed ID: 31248245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. β-type TiNbSn Alloy Plates With Low Young Modulus Accelerates Osteosynthesis in Rabbit Tibiae.
Ito K; Mori Y; Kamimura M; Koguchi M; Kurishima H; Koyama T; Mori N; Masahashi N; Hanada S; Itoi E; Aizawa T
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Sep; 480(9):1817-1832. PubMed ID: 35543573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
