These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38907659)

  • 21. Effects of judicial instructions and case characteristics in a mock jury trial of battered women who kill.
    Terrance CA; Matheson K; Spanos NP
    Law Hum Behav; 2000 Apr; 24(2):207-29. PubMed ID: 10810839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Remission of PTSD after victims of intimate partner violence leave a shelter.
    Johnson DM; Zlotnick C
    J Trauma Stress; 2012 Apr; 25(2):203-6. PubMed ID: 22522736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Jurors' cognitive depletion and performance during jury deliberation as a function of jury diversity and defendant race.
    Peter-Hagene L
    Law Hum Behav; 2019 Jun; 43(3):232-249. PubMed ID: 31120276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Keep your bias to yourself: How deliberating with differently biased others affects mock-jurors' guilt decisions, perceptions of the defendant, memories, and evidence interpretation.
    Ruva CL; Guenther CC
    Law Hum Behav; 2017 Oct; 41(5):478-493. PubMed ID: 28714733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Gender Role Attitudes and Prosecutorial Decision-Making in a Case of Intimate Partner Violence.
    MacNeil ER; Cox J; Daquin JC; Neal TMS
    J Interpers Violence; 2024 Apr; 39(7-8):1496-1518. PubMed ID: 37902455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Expert evidence pertaining to battered women: the impact of gender of expert and timing of testimony.
    Schuller RA; Cripps J
    Law Hum Behav; 1998 Feb; 22(1):17-31. PubMed ID: 9487789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Juror decision making in not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder trials: Effects of defendant gender and mental illness type.
    Mossière A; Maeder EM
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2016; 49(Pt A):47-54. PubMed ID: 27237958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The Interactive Effects of Race and Expert Testimony on Jurors' Perceptions of Recanted Confessions.
    Ewanation L; Maeder EM
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():699077. PubMed ID: 34539496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Intimate partner violence-related experiences and mental health among college students in Japan, Singapore, South Korea and Taiwan.
    Kamimura A; Nourian MM; Assasnik N; Franchek-Roa K
    Int J Soc Psychiatry; 2016 May; 62(3):262-70. PubMed ID: 26888967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Acquaintance rape: the effect of race of defendant and race of victim on white juror decisions.
    Hymes RW; Leinart M; Rowe S; Rogers W
    J Soc Psychol; 1993 Oct; 133(5):627-34. PubMed ID: 8283859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Jurors' and Judges' Evaluation of Defendants with Autism and the Impact on Sentencing: A Systematic Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) Review of Autism Spectrum Disorder in the Courtroom.
    Allely CS; Cooper P
    J Law Med; 2017 Nov; 25(1):105-123. PubMed ID: 29978627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Attractive but guilty: deliberation and the physical attractiveness bias.
    Patry MW
    Psychol Rep; 2008 Jun; 102(3):727-33. PubMed ID: 18763443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Canadian mock juror attitudes and decisions in domestic violence cases involving asian and white interracial and intraracial couples.
    Maeder EM; Mossière A; Cheung L
    J Interpers Violence; 2013 Mar; 28(4):667-84. PubMed ID: 22929345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. World assumptions, religiosity, and PTSD in survivors of intimate partner violence.
    Lilly MM; Howell KH; Graham-Bermann S
    Violence Against Women; 2015 Jan; 21(1):87-104. PubMed ID: 25540252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Commentary: Perception of remorse by mock jurors in a capital murder trial.
    Batista LM; Myers W
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2012; 40(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 22396342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Victim Impact Statements: How Victim Social Class Affects Juror Decision Making.
    Schweitzer K; Nuñez N
    Violence Vict; 2017 Jun; 32(3):521-532. PubMed ID: 28516855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Jurors' perceptions of juvenile defendants: the influence of intellectual disability, abuse history, and confession evidence.
    Najdowski CJ; Bottoms BL; Vargas MC
    Behav Sci Law; 2009; 27(3):401-30. PubMed ID: 19391102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Juror decision-making in a mock sexually violent predator trial: gender differences in the impact of divergent types of expert testimony.
    Guy LS; Edens JF
    Behav Sci Law; 2003; 21(2):215-37. PubMed ID: 12645046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Intimate partner violence outcomes in women with PTSD and substance use: a secondary analysis of NIDA Clinical Trials Network "Women and Trauma" Multi-site Study.
    Cohen LR; Field C; Campbell AN; Hien DA
    Addict Behav; 2013 Jul; 38(7):2325-32. PubMed ID: 23584194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Race and jurors' receptivity to mitigation in capital cases: the effect of jurors', defendants', and victims' race in combination.
    Brewer TW
    Law Hum Behav; 2004 Oct; 28(5):529-45. PubMed ID: 15638208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.