These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38908687)

  • 1. Exploring unknown parent groups and metafounders in single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction: Insights from a simulated cattle population.
    Himmelbauer J; Schwarzenbacher H; Fuerst C; Fuerst-Waltl B
    J Dairy Sci; 2024 Oct; 107(10):8170-8192. PubMed ID: 38908687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Invited review: Unknown-parent groups and metafounders in single-step genomic BLUP.
    Masuda Y; VanRaden PM; Tsuruta S; Lourenco DAL; Misztal I
    J Dairy Sci; 2022 Feb; 105(2):923-939. PubMed ID: 34799109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bias and accuracy of dairy sheep evaluations using BLUP and SSGBLUP with metafounders and unknown parent groups.
    Macedo FL; Christensen OF; Astruc JM; Aguilar I; Masuda Y; Legarra A
    Genet Sel Evol; 2020 Aug; 52(1):47. PubMed ID: 32787772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Single-step genomic BLUP with many metafounders.
    Kudinov AA; Koivula M; Aamand GP; Strandén I; Mäntysaari EA
    Front Genet; 2022; 13():1012205. PubMed ID: 36479243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Metafounder approach for single-step genomic evaluations of Red Dairy cattle.
    Kudinov AA; Mäntysaari EA; Aamand GP; Uimari P; Strandén I
    J Dairy Sci; 2020 Jul; 103(7):6299-6310. PubMed ID: 32418688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Metafounders May Reduce Bias in Composite Cattle Genomic Predictions.
    Kluska S; Masuda Y; Ferraz JBS; Tsuruta S; Eler JP; Baldi F; Lourenco D
    Front Genet; 2021; 12():678587. PubMed ID: 34490031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modeling missing pedigree in single-step genomic BLUP.
    Bradford HL; Masuda Y; VanRaden PM; Legarra A; Misztal I
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Mar; 102(3):2336-2346. PubMed ID: 30638995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Modeling missing pedigree with metafounders and validating single-step genomic predictions in a small dairy cattle population with a great influence of foreign genetics.
    López-Correa RD; Legarra A; Aguilar I
    J Dairy Sci; 2024 Jul; 107(7):4685-4692. PubMed ID: 38310956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genomic predictions for yield traits in US Holsteins with unknown parent groups.
    Cesarani A; Masuda Y; Tsuruta S; Nicolazzi EL; VanRaden PM; Lourenco D; Misztal I
    J Dairy Sci; 2021 May; 104(5):5843-5853. PubMed ID: 33663836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Controlling bias in genomic breeding values for young genotyped bulls.
    Tsuruta S; Lourenco DAL; Masuda Y; Misztal I; Lawlor TJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Nov; 102(11):9956-9970. PubMed ID: 31495630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Unknown parent groups and truncated pedigree in single-step genomic evaluations of Murrah buffaloes.
    Melo TP; Zwirtes AK; Silva AA; Lázaro SF; Oliveira HR; Silveira KR; Santos JCG; Andrade WBF; Kluska S; Evangelho LA; Oliveira HN; Tonhati H
    J Dairy Sci; 2024 Oct; 107(10):8130-8140. PubMed ID: 38825116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modeling genetic differences of combined broiler chicken populations in single-step GBLUP.
    Bermann M; Lourenco D; Breen V; Hawken R; Brito Lopes F; Misztal I
    J Anim Sci; 2021 Apr; 99(4):. PubMed ID: 33649764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of models for missing pedigree in single-step genomic prediction.
    Masuda Y; Tsuruta S; Bermann M; Bradford HL; Misztal I
    J Anim Sci; 2021 Feb; 99(2):. PubMed ID: 33493284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Metafounders are related to F
    Garcia-Baccino CA; Legarra A; Christensen OF; Misztal I; Pocrnic I; Vitezica ZG; Cantet RJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Mar; 49(1):34. PubMed ID: 28283016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Applying the Metafounders Approach for Genomic Evaluation in a Multibreed Beef Cattle Population.
    Junqueira VS; Lopes PS; Lourenco D; Silva FFE; Cardoso FF
    Front Genet; 2020; 11():556399. PubMed ID: 33424914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Unknown-parent groups in single-step genomic evaluation.
    Misztal I; Vitezica ZG; Legarra A; Aguilar I; Swan AA
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2013 Aug; 130(4):252-8. PubMed ID: 23855627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Removing data and using metafounders alleviates biases for all traits in Lacaune dairy sheep predictions.
    Macedo FL; Astruc JM; Meuwissen THE; Legarra A
    J Dairy Sci; 2022 Mar; 105(3):2439-2452. PubMed ID: 35033343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assigning unknown parent groups to reduce bias in genomic evaluations of final score in US Holsteins.
    Tsuruta S; Misztal I; Lourenco DA; Lawlor TJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 Sep; 97(9):5814-21. PubMed ID: 24997668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multi-line ssGBLUP evaluation using preselected markers from whole-genome sequence data in pigs.
    Jang S; Ros-Freixedes R; Hickey JM; Chen CY; Herring WO; Holl J; Misztal I; Lourenco D
    Front Genet; 2023; 14():1163626. PubMed ID: 37252662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Single-step genomic evaluation with metafounders for feed conversion ratio and average daily gain in Danish Landrace and Yorkshire pigs.
    Fu C; Ostersen T; Christensen OF; Xiang T
    Genet Sel Evol; 2021 Oct; 53(1):79. PubMed ID: 34620083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.