These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38909276)

  • 21. Radiographic evaluation of orthodontic treatment by means of four different cephalometric superimposition methods.
    Lenza MA; Carvalho AA; Lenza EB; Lenza MG; Torres HM; Souza JB
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(3):29-36. PubMed ID: 26154453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Assessing the Reliability of Digitalized Cephalometric Analysis in Comparison with Manual Cephalometric Analysis.
    Farooq MU; Khan MA; Imran S; Sameera A; Qureshi A; Ahmed SA; Kumar S; Rahman MA
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2016 Oct; 10(10):ZC20-ZC23. PubMed ID: 27891451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. How important are lateral cephalometric radiographs in orthodontic treatment planning?
    Devereux L; Moles D; Cunningham SJ; McKnight M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Feb; 139(2):e175-81. PubMed ID: 21300228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The reliability and reproducibility of cephalometric measurements: a comparison of conventional and digital methods.
    Albarakati SF; Kula KS; Ghoneima AA
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2012 Jan; 41(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 22184624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Investigation of the Relationship between Sagittal Skeletal Nasal Profile Morphology and Malocclusions: A Lateral Cephalometric Film Study.
    Ocak Y; Cicek O; Ozkalayci N; Erener H
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Jan; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 36766568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Reproducibility of Computerized Cephalometric Analysis Software Compared with Conventional Manual Tracing for Analyzing Skeletal Stability After Orthognathic Surgery.
    Thet PH; Kaboosaya B
    J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2023 Dec; 22(4):833-840. PubMed ID: 38105843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Accuracy of Manual and Virtual Predictive Tracings in Patients Submitted to Orthognathic Surgery.
    Gorla LFO; Dos Santos JC; Carvalho PHA; Hochuli-Vieira E; Gabrielli MAC
    J Craniofac Surg; 2023 Jun; 34(4):1165-1169. PubMed ID: 36253326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A randomized clinical trial to assess the sagittal effects of Transforce transverse appliance (TTA) and NiTi palatal expander (NPE) on skeletal class II malocclusion in growing patients during retention phase - A cephalometric study using a historical control group.
    Nagrik AP; Bhad WA; Chavan SJ; Doshi UH
    Int Orthod; 2020 Dec; 18(4):722-731. PubMed ID: 33020047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cephalometric measurements performed on CBCT and reconstructed lateral cephalograms: a cross-sectional study providing a quantitative approach of differences and bias.
    Baldini B; Cavagnetto D; Baselli G; Sforza C; Tartaglia GM
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 Mar; 22(1):98. PubMed ID: 35351080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cephalometric evaluation of surgical mandibular advancement.
    Boeck EM; Kuramae M; Lunardi N; Santos-Pinto Ad; Mazzonetto R
    Braz Oral Res; 2010; 24(2):189-96. PubMed ID: 20658038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Validity and reproducibility of cephalometric measurements obtained from digital photographs of analogue headfilms.
    Grybauskas S; Balciuniene I; Vetra J
    Stomatologija; 2007; 9(4):114-20. PubMed ID: 18303276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Reproducibility of linear and angular cephalometric measurements obtained by an artificial-intelligence assisted software (WebCeph) in comparison with digital software (AutoCEPH) and manual tracing method.
    Prince STT; Srinivasan D; Duraisamy S; Kannan R; Rajaram K
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2023; 28(1):e2321214. PubMed ID: 37018830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Measurements from conventional, digital and CT-derived cephalograms: a comparative study.
    Ghoneima A; Albarakati S; Baysal A; Uysal T; Kula K
    Aust Orthod J; 2012 Nov; 28(2):232-9. PubMed ID: 23304973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of Soft Tissue Landmark Reliability between Manual and Computerized Plotting Methods.
    Kasinathan G; Kommi PB; Kumar SM; Yashwant A; Arani N; Sabapathy S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Apr; 18(4):317-321. PubMed ID: 28349911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparative Evaluation of Nemoceph and Foxit PDF Reader for Steiner's Cephalometric Analysis.
    Kumar M; Kumari S; Shetty P; Kumar RR; Singh DP; Shetty P
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Sep; 20(9):1051-1055. PubMed ID: 31797828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparative study of cephalometric measurements using 3 imaging modalities.
    Wen J; Liu S; Ye X; Xie X; Li J; Li H; Mei L
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2017 Dec; 148(12):913-921. PubMed ID: 29042006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Lateral teleradiography of the cranium: the effect of head positioning in the interpretation of cephalometric tracings. An experimental study on a phantom].
    Blanc M; Garattini G; Moruzzi E
    Radiol Med; 1997 Oct; 94(4):302-7. PubMed ID: 9465234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Accuracy and tracing time of cephalometric analyses on a tablet or desktop computer : A prospective study.
    Kanemeier M; Middelberg C; Stamm T; Albert F; Hohoff A; Schmid JQ
    Head Face Med; 2024 Feb; 20(1):9. PubMed ID: 38347578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The Reliability of Two- and Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Measurements: A CBCT Study.
    Li C; Teixeira H; Tanna N; Zheng Z; Chen SHY; Zou M; Chung CH
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2021 Dec; 11(12):. PubMed ID: 34943528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A comparison of two-dimensional radiography and three-dimensional computed tomography in angular cephalometric measurements.
    Nalçaci R; Oztürk F; Sökücü O
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Feb; 39(2):100-6. PubMed ID: 20100922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.