These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38909646)
1. The effect on the performance of a dynamic navigation system of superimposing a standard tessellation language (STL) file obtained with an intraoral scan on a cone beam computer tomograph (CBCT). An experimental in vitro study. Jorba-García A; Ruiz-Romero V; Bara-Casaus JJ; Camps-Font O; Sánchez-Garcés MÁ; Figueiredo R; Valmaseda-Castellón E J Dent; 2024 Sep; 148():105150. PubMed ID: 38909646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The influence of radiographic marker registration versus a markerless trace registration method on the implant placement accuracy achieved by dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery. An in-vitro study. Jorba-García A; Bara-Casaus JJ; Camps-Font O; Figueiredo R; Valmaseda-Castellón E J Dent; 2024 Jul; 146():105072. PubMed ID: 38763387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery in fully edentulous patients: An in vitro study. Ruiz-Romero V; Jorba-Garcia A; Camps-Font O; Figueiredo R; Valmaseda-Castellón E J Dent; 2024 Oct; 149():105290. PubMed ID: 39106900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of dental implant placement with or without the use of a dynamic navigation assisted system: A randomized clinical trial. Jorba-García A; Bara-Casaus JJ; Camps-Font O; Sánchez-Garcés MÁ; Figueiredo R; Valmaseda-Castellón E Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 May; 34(5):438-449. PubMed ID: 36794798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of implant placement using a mixed reality-based dynamic navigation system versus static computer-assisted and freehand surgery: An in Vitro study. Shusterman A; Nashef R; Tecco S; Mangano C; Lerner H; Mangano FG J Dent; 2024 Jul; 146():105052. PubMed ID: 38734298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Positional accuracy of a prosthetic treatment plan incorporated into a cone beam computed tomography scan using surface scan registration. Jamjoom FZ; Kim DG; McGlumphy EA; Lee DJ; Yilmaz B J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):367-374. PubMed ID: 29703673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of cone beam computed tomography and a laser intraoral scanner in virtual dental implant surgery: part 1. Lee CY; Ganz SD; Wong N; Suzuki JB Implant Dent; 2012 Aug; 21(4):265-71. PubMed ID: 22814549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of a dynamic navigation system for dental implantation with two different workflows and intraoral markers compared to static-guided implant surgery: An in-vitro study. Struwe M; Leontiev W; Connert T; Kühl S; Filippi A; Herber V; Dagassan-Berndt D Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Mar; 34(3):196-208. PubMed ID: 36626272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy assessment of dynamic computer-aided implant placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Jorba-García A; González-Barnadas A; Camps-Font O; Figueiredo R; Valmaseda-Castellón E Clin Oral Investig; 2021 May; 25(5):2479-2494. PubMed ID: 33635397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Accuracy of Guided Implant Surgery With Different Fields of View of Cone-Beam Computerized Tomography. Lee HC; Chiou LL; Yang CC; Lin WS; Dutra V; Hamada Y J Oral Implantol; 2024 Apr; 50(2):111-118. PubMed ID: 38400736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of a Dynamic Dental Implant Navigation System in a Private Practice. Stefanelli LV; DeGroot BS; Lipton DI; Mandelaris GA Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(1):205–213. PubMed ID: 30521660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In Vivo Accuracy of Implant Placement Using a Full Digital Planning Modality and Stereolithographic Guides. Skjerven H; Riis UH; Herlofsson BB; Ellingsen JE Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(1):124-132. PubMed ID: 30695088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of operator experience on the accuracy of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical templates: an in vitro study. Cushen SE; Turkyilmaz I J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):248-54. PubMed ID: 23566606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of length and location of edentulous area on the accuracy of prosthetic treatment plan incorporation into cone-beam computed tomography scans. Jamjoom FZ; Kim DG; Lee DJ; McGlumphy EA; Yilmaz B Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2018 Jun; 20(3):300-307. PubMed ID: 29399999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Is Intraoral Scanning Accurate to Evaluate Dental Implant Position? An In-Vitro Study. Bergamaschi IP; Cortellazzi KL; Sverzut AT J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2023 Apr; 81(4):441-455. PubMed ID: 36584976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A clinically relevant accuracy study of computer-planned implant placement in the edentulous maxilla using mucosa-supported surgical templates. Verhamme LM; Meijer GJ; Boumans T; de Haan AF; Bergé SJ; Maal TJ Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Apr; 17(2):343-52. PubMed ID: 23879524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of Implant Placement Position Using Nondental Open-Source Software: An In Vitro Study. Talmazov G; Bencharit S; Waldrop TC; Ammoun R J Prosthodont; 2020 Aug; 29(7):604-610. PubMed ID: 32495453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dynamic navigation for dental implant placement in single-tooth gaps: A preclinical pilot investigation. Böse MWH; Beuer F; Schwitalla A; Bruhnke M; Herklotz I J Dent; 2022 Oct; 125():104265. PubMed ID: 35995082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of dental implant placement using augmented reality-based navigation, static computer assisted implant surgery, and the free-hand method: An in vitro study. Kivovics M; Takács A; Pénzes D; Németh O; Mijiritsky E J Dent; 2022 Apr; 119():104070. PubMed ID: 35183695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]