These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38909646)
21. Scan accuracy and time efficiency of different implant-supported fixed partial denture situations depending on the intraoral scanner and scanned area: An in vitro study. Donmez MB; Mathey A; Gäumann F; Mathey A; Yilmaz B; Abou-Ayash S J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jun; 131(6):1198-1207. PubMed ID: 36868987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of the accuracy of two different dynamic navigation system registration methods for dental implant placement: A retrospective study. Ma F; Sun F; Wei T; Ma Y Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2022 Jun; 24(3):352-360. PubMed ID: 35536921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison the accuracy of a novel implant robot surgery and dynamic navigation system in dental implant surgery: an in vitro pilot study. Chen J; Bai X; Ding Y; Shen L; Sun X; Cao R; Yang F; Wang L BMC Oral Health; 2023 Mar; 23(1):179. PubMed ID: 36978064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Dynamic Navigation for Dental Implant Placement. Pinter GT; Decker R; Szenasi G; Barabas P; Huszar T J Vis Exp; 2022 Sep; (187):. PubMed ID: 36190264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Accuracy in static guided implant surgery: Results from a multicenter retrospective clinical study on 21 patients treated in three private practices. Luongo F; Lerner H; Gesso C; Sormani A; Kalemaj Z; Luongo G J Dent; 2024 Jan; 140():104795. PubMed ID: 38016619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Accuracy of dynamic navigation compared to static surgical guides and the freehand approach in implant placement: a prospective clinical study. Younis H; Lv C; Xu B; Zhou H; Du L; Liao L; Zhao N; Long W; Elayah SA; Chang X; He L Head Face Med; 2024 May; 20(1):30. PubMed ID: 38745297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Accuracy assessment of dynamic navigation during implant placement: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies in the last 10 years. Yu X; Tao B; Wang F; Wu Y J Dent; 2023 Aug; 135():104567. PubMed ID: 37263412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Validation of an Intra-Oral Scan Method Versus Cone Beam Computed Tomography Superimposition to Assess the Accuracy between Planned and Achieved Dental Implants: A Randomized In Vitro Study. Franchina A; Stefanelli LV; Maltese F; Mandelaris GA; Vantaggiato A; Pagliarulo M; Pranno N; Brauner E; Angelis F; Carlo SD Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Dec; 17(24):. PubMed ID: 33542168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Accuracy of computer-aided static and dynamic navigation systems in the placement of zygomatic dental implants. González Rueda JR; Galparsoro Catalán A; de Paz Hermoso VM; Riad Deglow E; Zubizarreta-Macho Á; Pato Mourelo J; Montero Martín J; Hernández Montero S BMC Oral Health; 2023 Mar; 23(1):150. PubMed ID: 36918837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Accuracy of dental implant surgery using dynamic navigation and robotic systems: An in vitro study. Tao B; Feng Y; Fan X; Zhuang M; Chen X; Wang F; Wu Y J Dent; 2022 Aug; 123():104170. PubMed ID: 35679989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Accuracy analysis of robotic-assisted immediate implant placement: A retrospective case series. Zhao N; Du L; Lv C; Liang J; He L; Zhou Q J Dent; 2024 Jul; 146():105035. PubMed ID: 38734299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A randomized clinical trial comparing guided implant surgery (bone- or mucosa-supported) with mental navigation or the use of a pilot-drill template. Vercruyssen M; Cox C; Coucke W; Naert I; Jacobs R; Quirynen M J Clin Periodontol; 2014 Jul; 41(7):717-23. PubMed ID: 24460748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Registration of cone beam computed tomography data and intraoral surface scans - A prerequisite for guided implant surgery with CAD/CAM drilling guides. Flügge T; Derksen W; Te Poel J; Hassan B; Nelson K; Wismeijer D Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Sep; 28(9):1113-1118. PubMed ID: 27440381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Minimally Invasive Navigation-Guided Quad Zygomatic Implant Placement: A Comparative In Vitro Study. Fan S; Gielisch MW; Díaz L; Thiem DGE; Al-Nawas B; Kämmerer PW Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2023; 38(2):367-373. PubMed ID: 37083908 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Accuracy of dynamic implant navigation surgery performed by a novice operator. Marques-Guasch J; Rodriguez-Bauzá R; Satorres-Nieto M; Hom-Lay W; Hernández-Alfaro F; Gargallo-Albiol J Int J Comput Dent; 2022 Nov; 25(4):377-385. PubMed ID: 35060374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Digital versus radiographic accuracy evaluation of guided implant surgery: an in vitro study. Yi C; Li S; Wen A; Wang Y; Zhao Y; Zhang Y BMC Oral Health; 2022 Nov; 22(1):540. PubMed ID: 36424579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Optical Accuracy Assessment of Robotically Assisted Dental Implant Surgery for Partially Edentulous Patients: A Single-Arm Clinical Trial. Klass D; Price A; DiBattista M; Dibart S; Kernitsky J Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2024 Aug; 39(4):625-631. PubMed ID: 37910832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Radiopaque fiducial markers as an aid to fabrication of an implant surgical guide for a patient with orthodontic brackets: A dental technique. Lv HX; Rong R; Sa Y J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jun; 129(6):835-839. PubMed ID: 34556334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Accuracy of Implants Placed with Surgical Guides: Thermoplastic Versus 3D Printed. Bell CK; Sahl EF; Kim YJ; Rice DD Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2018; 38(1):113-119. PubMed ID: 29240212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Accuracy and Precision of Haptic Robotic-Guided Implant Surgery in a Large Consecutive Series. Neugarten JM Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2024 Feb; 39(1):99-106. PubMed ID: 37939239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]