138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3890974)
21. Surface-dimpled commercially pure titanium implant and bone ingrowth.
Li J; Liao H; Fartash B; Hermansson L; Johnsson T
Biomaterials; 1997 May; 18(9):691-6. PubMed ID: 9152001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Experimental study of metallic bone and joint prostheses with plasma-sprayed ceramic coating].
Huang GK; Cao MJ
Zentralbl Chir; 1992; 117(3):171-7. PubMed ID: 1590032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Bone-implant interface and remaining tissues on the implant surface after push-out test: an SEM observation.
Li J
Biomed Mater Eng; 1997; 7(6):379-85. PubMed ID: 9622105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A pilot study of joint stability at the zirconium or titanium abutment/titanium implant interface.
Cavusoglu Y; Akça K; Gürbüz R; Cehreli MC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(2):338-43. PubMed ID: 24683559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Histomorphometric studies of hydroxylapatite-coated and uncoated CP titanium threaded implants in bone.
Gottlander M; Albrektsson T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1991; 6(4):399-404. PubMed ID: 1820308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The influence of surface-blasting on the incorporation of titanium-alloy implants in a rabbit intramedullary model.
Feighan JE; Goldberg VM; Davy D; Parr JA; Stevenson S
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1995 Sep; 77(9):1380-95. PubMed ID: 7673290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A comparative study of the bone contact to zirconium and titanium implants after 8 weeks of implantation in rabbit femoral condyles.
AlFarraj AA; Sukumaran A; Al Amri MD; Van Oirschot AB; Jansen JA
Odontology; 2018 Jan; 106(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 28194543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Surface analysis and effects on interfacial bone microhardness of collagen-coated titanium implants: a rabbit model.
Morra M; Cassinelli C; Meda L; Fini M; Giavaresi G; Giardino R
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 15747670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Osseointegration of zirconia implants: an SEM observation of the bone-implant interface.
Depprich R; Zipprich H; Ommerborn M; Mahn E; Lammers L; Handschel J; Naujoks C; Wiesmann HP; Kübler NR; Meyer U
Head Face Med; 2008 Nov; 4():25. PubMed ID: 18990214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The bone response of oxidized bioactive and non-bioactive titanium implants.
Sul YT; Johansson C; Byon E; Albrektsson T
Biomaterials; 2005 Nov; 26(33):6720-30. PubMed ID: 15975649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Does titanium surface treatment influence the bone-implant interface? SEM and histomorphometry in a 6-month sheep study.
Huré G; Donath K; Lesourd M; Chappard D; Baslé MF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(4):506-11. PubMed ID: 8803346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Bone bonding behavior of titanium and its alloys when coated with titanium oxide (TiO2) and titanium silicate (Ti5Si3).
Kitsugi T; Nakamura T; Oka M; Yan WQ; Goto T; Shibuya T; Kokubo T; Miyaji S
J Biomed Mater Res; 1996 Oct; 32(2):149-56. PubMed ID: 8884489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of bone-implant interface shear strength of solid hydroxyapatite and hydroxyapatite-coated titanium implants.
Hayashi K; Inadome T; Mashima T; Sugioka Y
J Biomed Mater Res; 1993 May; 27(5):557-63. PubMed ID: 8314808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Light and electron microscopic studies of bone-titanium interface in the tibiae of young and mature rats.
Murai K; Takeshita F; Ayukawa Y; Kiyoshima T; Suetsugu T; Tanaka T
J Biomed Mater Res; 1996 Apr; 30(4):523-33. PubMed ID: 8847361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The effect of surface macrotexture and hydroxylapatite coating on the mechanical strengths and histologic profiles of titanium implant materials.
Thomas KA; Kay JF; Cook SD; Jarcho M
J Biomed Mater Res; 1987 Dec; 21(12):1395-414. PubMed ID: 3429474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Histomorphometric and histologic evaluation of titanium-zirconium (aTiZr) implants with anodized surfaces.
Sharma A; McQuillan AJ; Shibata Y; Sharma LA; Waddell JN; Duncan WJ
J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2016 May; 27(5):86. PubMed ID: 26970768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Osseointegration of metallic implants. II. Transmission electron microscopy in the rabbit.
Linder L; Obrant K; Boivin G
Acta Orthop Scand; 1989 Apr; 60(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 2658465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. High-resolution microscopy of the implant-tissue interface.
Linder L
Acta Orthop Scand; 1985 Jun; 56(3):269-72. PubMed ID: 3898708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A comparative experimental investigation in monkeys between three different implant materials.
Nordlund A; Zetterqvist L; Odén A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1989 Dec; 18(6):373-7. PubMed ID: 2516106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Bone response to surface-modified titanium implants: studies on the early tissue response to machined and electropolished implants with different oxide thicknesses.
Larsson C; Thomsen P; Aronsson BO; Rodahl M; Lausmaa J; Kasemo B; Ericson LE
Biomaterials; 1996 Mar; 17(6):605-16. PubMed ID: 8652779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
