These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38910363)

  • 1.
    Ahuja V; Adiga Perdur G; Aj Z; Krishnappa M; Kandarova H
    Altern Lab Anim; 2024 Jul; 52(4):195-204. PubMed ID: 38910363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. KoCVAM-led development of phototoxicity alternative test method using reconstructed human epidermis model (KeraSkin™).
    Kang NH; Kim SH; Kim J
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2024 Jun; 188():114698. PubMed ID: 38679282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predicting skin sensitisation using a decision tree integrated testing strategy with an in silico model and in chemico/in vitro assays.
    Macmillan DS; Canipa SJ; Chilton ML; Williams RV; Barber CG
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2016 Apr; 76():30-8. PubMed ID: 26796566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the OECD QSAR toolbox automatic workflow for the prediction of the acute toxicity of organic chemicals to fathead minnow.
    Mombelli E; Pandard P
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2021 Jun; 122():104893. PubMed ID: 33587933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The 3T3 neutral red uptake phototoxicity test: practical experience and implications for phototoxicity testing--the report of an ECVAM-EFPIA workshop.
    Ceridono M; Tellner P; Bauer D; Barroso J; Alépée N; Corvi R; De Smedt A; Fellows MD; Gibbs NK; Heisler E; Jacobs A; Jirova D; Jones D; Kandárová H; Kasper P; Akunda JK; Krul C; Learn D; Liebsch M; Lynch AM; Muster W; Nakamura K; Nash JF; Pfannenbecker U; Phillips G; Robles C; Rogiers V; Van De Water F; Liminga UW; Vohr HW; Wattrelos O; Woods J; Zuang V; Kreysa J; Wilcox P
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2012 Aug; 63(3):480-8. PubMed ID: 22687423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of two biological systems used for phototoxicity testing: Cellular and tissue.
    Krakowian D; Żemła P; Gądarowska D; Mrzyk I
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2024 Aug; 489():117014. PubMed ID: 38914165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the global performance of eight in silico skin sensitization models using human data.
    Golden E; Macmillan DS; Dameron G; Kern P; Hartung T; Maertens A
    ALTEX; 2021; 38(1):33-48. PubMed ID: 32388570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In Silico Study of In Vitro GPCR Assays by QSAR Modeling.
    Mansouri K; Judson RS
    Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1425():361-81. PubMed ID: 27311474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A quantitative in silico model for predicting skin sensitization using a nearest neighbours approach within expert-derived structure-activity alert spaces.
    Canipa SJ; Chilton ML; Hemingway R; Macmillan DS; Myden A; Plante JP; Tennant RE; Vessey JD; Steger-Hartmann T; Gould J; Hillegass J; Etter S; Smith BPC; White A; Sterchele P; De Smedt A; O'Brien D; Parakhia R
    J Appl Toxicol; 2017 Aug; 37(8):985-995. PubMed ID: 28244128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Computer models versus reality: how well do in silico models currently predict the sensitization potential of a substance.
    Teubner W; Mehling A; Schuster PX; Guth K; Worth A; Burton J; van Ravenzwaay B; Landsiedel R
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2013 Dec; 67(3):468-85. PubMed ID: 24090701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development of a mechanistic SAR model for the detection of phototoxic chemicals and use in an integrated testing strategy.
    Ringeissen S; Marrot L; Note R; Labarussiat A; Imbert S; Todorov M; Mekenyan O; Meunier JR
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2011 Feb; 25(1):324-34. PubMed ID: 20932893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of in silico tools to predict the skin sensitization potential of chemicals.
    Verheyen GR; Braeken E; Van Deun K; Van Miert S
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2017 Jan; 28(1):59-73. PubMed ID: 28105856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How to resolve inconclusive predictions from defined approaches for skin sensitisation in OECD Guideline No. 497.
    Macmillan DS; Chilton ML; Gao Y; Kern PS; Schneider SN
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2022 Nov; 135():105248. PubMed ID: 36007801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The predictivity of the -alert performance- functionality of the OECD QSAR-Toolbox (c/w further issues on the predictivity of nonclinical testing).
    Suarez-Torres JD; Ciangherotti CE; Jimenez-Orozco FA
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2020 Aug; 66():104858. PubMed ID: 32278032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Non-animal photosafety assessment approaches for cosmetics based on the photochemical and photobiochemical properties.
    Onoue S; Suzuki G; Kato M; Hirota M; Nishida H; Kitagaki M; Kouzuki H; Yamada S
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2013 Dec; 27(8):2316-24. PubMed ID: 24134854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An evaluation of the predictive ability of the QSAR software packages, DEREK, HAZARDEXPERT and TOPKAT, to describe chemically-induced skin irritation.
    Mombelli E
    Altern Lab Anim; 2008 Feb; 36(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 18333711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Applicability of an Integrated Testing Strategy consisting of in silico, in chemico and in vitro assays for evaluating the skin sensitization potencies of isocyanates.
    Ohtake T; Maeda Y; Hayashi T; Yamanaka H; Nakai M; Takeyoshi M
    Toxicology; 2018 Jan; 393():9-14. PubMed ID: 29100879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of performance of the profilers provided in the OECD QSAR toolbox for category formation of chemicals.
    Aljallal MA; Chaudhry Q; Price NR
    Sci Rep; 2024 Aug; 14(1):18330. PubMed ID: 39112641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The establishment and assessment on cosmetic products using 3T3 mouse fibroblast neutral red uptake phototoxicity assay].
    Yang Y; Xiong XK; Yang XF; He XW; Huang JM; Tan XH; Zheng SS
    Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Nov; 41(6):479-82. PubMed ID: 18399129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Implementation of an in vitro methodology for phototoxicity evaluation in a human keratinocyte cell line.
    Maciel B; Moreira P; Carmo H; Gonçalo M; Lobo JMS; Almeida IF
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2019 Dec; 61():104618. PubMed ID: 31381965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.