210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3891203)
1. Twice-daily moxalactam versus gentamicin and clindamycin in patients with penetrating abdominal trauma.
Crots LD; Obeid FN; Horst HM; Bivins BA
Clin Pharm; 1985; 4(3):316-20. PubMed ID: 3891203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A prospective randomized study of moxalactam versus gentamicin and clindamycin in penetrating abdominal trauma.
Kreis DJ; Augenstein D; Martinez O; Echenique M; Plasencia G; Vopal JJ; Byers P; Gomez GA
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1986 Jul; 163(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 3726718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Presumptive antibiotics for penetrating abdominal wounds.
Moore FA; Moore EE; Ammons LA; McCroskey BL
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1989 Aug; 169(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 2667180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A prospective randomized comparison of a single antibiotic (moxalactam) versus combination therapy (gentamicin and clindamycin) in penetrating abdominal trauma.
Fifer T; Obeid FN; Horst HM; Sorensen VJ; Crots LD; Bivins BA
Henry Ford Hosp Med J; 1988; 36(1):52-5. PubMed ID: 3397299
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Pharmacoeconomics of aztreonam-clindamycin versus gentamicin-clindamycin in the treatment of penetrating abdominal injury.
Fabian TC; Boucher BA; Croce MC
Pharmacotherapy; 1996; 16(5):951-7. PubMed ID: 8888092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Presumptive antibiotics for penetrating abdominal wounds.
Posner MC; Moore EE; Harris LA; Allo MD
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1987 Jul; 165(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 3589921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of carbenicillin and a comparison of clindamycin and gentamicin combined therapy in penetrating abdominal trauma.
O'Donnell V; Mandal AK; Lou SM; Thadepalli H
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1978 Oct; 147(4):525-8. PubMed ID: 705571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Piperacillin and tazobactam versus clindamycin and gentamicin in the treatment of hospitalized women with pelvic infection. The Piperacillin/tazobactam Study Group.
Sweet RL; Roy S; Faro S; O'Brien WF; Sanfilippo JS; Seidlin M
Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Feb; 83(2):280-6. PubMed ID: 8290195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Superiority of aztreonam/clindamycin compared with gentamicin/clindamycin in patients with penetrating abdominal trauma.
Fabian TC; Hess MM; Croce MA; Wilson RS; Wilson SE; Charland SL; Rodman JH; Boucher BA
Am J Surg; 1994 Mar; 167(3):291-6. PubMed ID: 8160899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical comparison of cefotaxime versus the combination of gentamicin plus clindamycin in the treatment of polymicrobial soft-tissue surgical sepsis.
Strom PR; Geheber CE; Morris ES; Stone HH
Clin Ther; 1982; 5 Suppl A():26-31. PubMed ID: 6293715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Preventative antibiotics for penetrating abdominal trauma--single agent or combination therapy?
Bivins BA; Crots L; Sorensen VJ; Obeid FN; Horst HM
Drugs; 1988; 35 Suppl 2():100-5. PubMed ID: 3396471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prospective cost analysis of moxalactam versus clindamycin plus gentamicin for endomyometritis after cesarean section.
Knodel LC; Goldspiel BR; Gibbs RS
Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1988 Jun; 32(6):853-7. PubMed ID: 3415207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Single-antibiotic use for penetrating abdominal trauma.
Nelson RM; Benitez PR; Newell MA; Wilson RF
Arch Surg; 1986 Feb; 121(2):153-6. PubMed ID: 3947216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prophylactic antibiotics in the treatment of penetrating chest wounds. A prospective double-blind study.
Grover FL; Richardson JD; Fewel JG; Arom KV; Webb GE; Trinkle JK
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1977 Oct; 74(4):528-36. PubMed ID: 333188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prospective randomized study of two different doses of clindamycin admixed with gentamicin in the management of perforated appendicitis.
Yellin AE; Berne TV; Heseltine PN; Appleman MD; Gill M; Chin A; Baker FJ
Am Surg; 1993 Apr; 59(4):248-55. PubMed ID: 8489087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Risk of infection after penetrating abdominal trauma.
Nichols RL; Smith JW; Klein DB; Trunkey DD; Cooper RH; Adinolfi MF; Mills J
N Engl J Med; 1984 Oct; 311(17):1065-70. PubMed ID: 6482920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A prospective comparison of gentamicin and metronidazole and moxalactam in the prevention of septic complications associated with elective operations of the colon and rectum.
McCulloch PG; Blamey SL; Finlay IG; Baird A; Sleigh D; Gardner E; McArdle CS
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1986 Jun; 162(6):521-4. PubMed ID: 3520902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of moxalactam with the combination of clindamycin and an aminoglycoside in the treatment of common surgical infections.
Rambo WM; Del Bene VE; Burkey LG; Collins CD; Richmond DK
Rev Infect Dis; 1982; 4 Suppl():S683-7. PubMed ID: 6218583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Results of the North American trial of piperacillin/tazobactam compared with clindamycin and gentamicin in the treatment of severe intra-abdominal infections. Investigators of the Piperacillin/Tazobactam Intra-abdominal Infection Study Group.
Eur J Surg Suppl; 1994; (573):61-6. PubMed ID: 7524798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stability and cost analysis of clindamycin-gentamicin admixtures given every eight hours.
Mansur JM; Abramowitz PW; Lerner SA; Smith RB; Townsend RJ
Am J Hosp Pharm; 1985 Feb; 42(2):332-5. PubMed ID: 3976680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
