These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38913419)

  • 1. Feasibility of robotic-assisted surgery in advanced rectal cancer: a multicentre prospective phase II study (VITRUVIANO trial).
    Hamabe A; Takemasa I; Kotake M; Nakano D; Hasegawa S; Shiomi A; Numata M; Sakamoto K; Kimura K; Hanai T; Naitoh T; Fukunaga Y; Kinugasa Y; Watanabe J; Kawamura J; Ozawa M; Okabayashi K; Matoba S; Takano Y; Uemura M; Kanemitsu Y; Sakai Y; Watanabe M
    BJS Open; 2024 May; 8(3):. PubMed ID: 38913419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for middle and low rectal cancer (REAL): short-term outcomes of a multicentre randomised controlled trial.
    Feng Q; Yuan W; Li T; Tang B; Jia B; Zhou Y; Zhang W; Zhao R; Zhang C; Cheng L; Zhang X; Liang F; He G; Wei Y; Xu J;
    Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2022 Nov; 7(11):991-1004. PubMed ID: 36087608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The circumferential resection margins status: A comparison of robotic, laparoscopic and open total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer.
    de Jesus JP; Valadão M; de Castro Araujo RO; Cesar D; Linhares E; Iglesias AC
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Jun; 42(6):808-12. PubMed ID: 27038996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Efficacy comparison between robot-assisted and laparoscopic surgery for mid-low rectal cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial].
    Tang B; Gao GM; Zou Z; Liu DN; Tang C; Jiang QG; Lei X; Li TY
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Apr; 23(4):377-383. PubMed ID: 32306606
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy for stage II-III locally advanced rectal cancer: a single-centre cohort study.
    Angehrn FV; Schneider R; Wilhelm A; Daume D; Koechlin L; Fourie L; von Flüe M; Kern B; Steinemann DC; Bolli M
    J Robot Surg; 2022 Oct; 16(5):1133-1141. PubMed ID: 35000106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Robot-assisted intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: technique and short-term outcome for 29 consecutive patients.
    Leong QM; Son DN; Cho JS; Baek SJ; Kwak JM; Amar AH; Kim SH
    Surg Endosc; 2011 Sep; 25(9):2987-92. PubMed ID: 21484533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Robotic versus laparoscopic sphincter-saving total mesorectal excision for mid or low rectal cancer in male patients after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy: comparison of long-term outcomes.
    Asoglu O; Tokmak H; Bakir B; Aliyev V; Saglam S; Iscan Y; Bademler S; Meric S
    J Robot Surg; 2020 Jun; 14(3):393-399. PubMed ID: 31313071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Robotic-assisted multivisceral resection for rectal cancer: short-term outcomes at a single center.
    Hino H; Yamaguchi T; Kinugasa Y; Shiomi A; Kagawa H; Yamakawa Y; Numata M; Furutani A; Yamaoka Y; Manabe S; Suzuki T; Kato S
    Tech Coloproctol; 2017 Nov; 21(11):879-886. PubMed ID: 29134385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Association of Surgical Approaches and Outcomes in Total Mesorectal Excision and Margin Status for Rectal Cancer.
    Mirza MB; Gamboa AC; Irlmeier R; Hopkins B; Regenbogen SE; Hrebinko KA; Holder-Murray J; Wiseman JT; Ejaz A; Wise PE; Ye F; Idrees K; Hawkins AT; Balch GC; Khan A
    J Surg Res; 2024 Aug; 300():494-502. PubMed ID: 38875948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of Minimally Invasive Resection Technique on Sphincter Preservation and Short-term Outcome in Low Rectal Cancer in the Netherlands.
    Rutgers ML; Detering R; Roodbeen SX; Crolla RM; Dekker JWT; Tuynman JB; Sietses C; Bemelman WA; Tanis PJ; Hompes R;
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2021 Dec; 64(12):1488-1500. PubMed ID: 33990499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quality of total mesorectal excision and depth of circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer: a matched comparison of the first 20 robotic cases.
    Barnajian M; Pettet D; Kazi E; Foppa C; Bergamaschi R
    Colorectal Dis; 2014 Aug; 16(8):603-9. PubMed ID: 24750995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robotic surgery for locally advanced T4 rectal cancer: feasibility and oncological quality.
    Gomez Ruiz M; Ballestero Diego R; Tejedor P; Cagigas Fernandez C; Cristobal Poch L; Suarez Pazos N; Castillo Diego J
    Updates Surg; 2023 Apr; 75(3):589-597. PubMed ID: 36763301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a prospective pilot study.
    Gómez Ruiz M; Parra IM; Palazuelos CM; Martín JA; Fernández CC; Diego JC; Fleitas MG
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2015 Jan; 58(1):145-53. PubMed ID: 25489707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does robotic rectal cancer surgery improve the results of experienced laparoscopic surgeons? An observational single institution study comparing 168 robotic assisted with 184 laparoscopic rectal resections.
    Crolla RMPH; Mulder PG; van der Schelling GP
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Nov; 32(11):4562-4570. PubMed ID: 29761276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rectal Surgery Evaluation Trial: protocol for a parallel cohort trial of outcomes using surgical techniques for total mesorectal excision with low anterior resection in high-risk rectal cancer patients.
    Rouanet P; Gourgou S; Gogenur I; Jayne D; Ulrich A; Rautio T; Spinoglio G; Bouazza N; Moussion A; Gomez Ruiz M
    Colorectal Dis; 2019 May; 21(5):516-522. PubMed ID: 30740878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of Robotic-Assisted vs Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery on Risk of Conversion to Open Laparotomy Among Patients Undergoing Resection for Rectal Cancer: The ROLARR Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Jayne D; Pigazzi A; Marshall H; Croft J; Corrigan N; Copeland J; Quirke P; West N; Rautio T; Thomassen N; Tilney H; Gudgeon M; Bianchi PP; Edlin R; Hulme C; Brown J
    JAMA; 2017 Oct; 318(16):1569-1580. PubMed ID: 29067426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Robotic coloanal anastomosis with or without intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: starting with the perianal approach followed by robotic procedure.
    Kang J; Hur H; Min BS; Lee KY; Kim NK
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Jan; 19(1):154-5. PubMed ID: 21822556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Analysis of robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery on 162 cases with rectal neoplasms].
    Zhou JJ; Li TG; Lei SL; Chen WD; Liu KJ; Liu B; Yao HL
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Apr; 23(4):384-389. PubMed ID: 32306607
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Robotic, transanal, and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for locally advanced mid/low rectal cancer: European multicentre, propensity score-matched study.
    de'Angelis N; Marchegiani F; Martínez-Pérez A; Biondi A; Pucciarelli S; Schena CA; Pellino G; Kraft M; van Lieshout AS; Morelli L; Valverde A; Lupinacci RM; Gómez-Abril SA; Persiani R; Tuynman JB; Espin-Basany E; Ris F;
    BJS Open; 2024 May; 8(3):. PubMed ID: 38805357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial.
    van der Pas MH; Haglind E; Cuesta MA; Fürst A; Lacy AM; Hop WC; Bonjer HJ;
    Lancet Oncol; 2013 Mar; 14(3):210-8. PubMed ID: 23395398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.