These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38914923)

  • 1. Proactive reward in conflict tasks: Does it only enhance general performance or also modulate conflict effects?
    Bräutigam LC; Leuthold H; Mackenzie IG; Mittelstädt V
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38914923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of reward in the Simon task: Differences and similarities to the Stroop and Eriksen flanker tasks.
    Mittelstädt V; Ulrich R; König J; Hofbauer K; Mackenzie IG
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Apr; 85(3):949-959. PubMed ID: 36316615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Exploring behavioral adjustments of proportion congruency manipulations in an Eriksen flanker task with visual and auditory distractor modalities.
    Bräutigam LC; Leuthold H; Mackenzie IG; Mittelstädt V
    Mem Cognit; 2024 Jan; 52(1):91-114. PubMed ID: 37548866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of conflict trial proportion: A comparison of the Eriksen and Simon tasks.
    Bausenhart KM; Ulrich R; Miller J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Feb; 83(2):810-836. PubMed ID: 33269440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of temporal order of relevant and irrelevant dimensions within conflict tasks.
    Mackenzie IG; Mittelstädt V; Ulrich R; Leuthold H
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 Oct; 48(10):1099-1115. PubMed ID: 35980705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The time-course of distractor-based activation modulates effects of speed-accuracy tradeoffs in conflict tasks.
    Mittelstädt V; Miller J; Leuthold H; Mackenzie IG; Ulrich R
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Jun; 29(3):837-854. PubMed ID: 34918279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interacting congruency effects in the hybrid Stroop-Simon task prevent conclusions regarding the domain specificity or generality of the congruency sequence effect.
    Weissman DH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 May; 46(5):945-967. PubMed ID: 31580121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of distractor relevance on the strength and timing of cognitive control: Evidence from delta plots and diffusion model analyses.
    Mittelstädt V; Mackenzie IG; Koob V; Janczyk M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 Oct; 49(10):1588-1614. PubMed ID: 37561515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of task-relevant and task-irrelevant information in congruency sequence effects: Applying the diffusion model for conflict tasks.
    Koob V; Mackenzie I; Ulrich R; Leuthold H; Janczyk M
    Cogn Psychol; 2023 Feb; 140():101528. PubMed ID: 36584549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Motor demands influence conflict processing in a mouse-tracking Simon task.
    Mittelstädt V; Leuthold H; Mackenzie IG
    Psychol Res; 2023 Sep; 87(6):1768-1783. PubMed ID: 36403176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Distributional reaction time properties in the Eriksen task: marked differences or hidden similarities with the Simon task?
    Burle B; Spieser L; Servant M; Hasbroucq T
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Aug; 21(4):1003-10. PubMed ID: 24302468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A revised diffusion model for conflict tasks.
    Lee PS; Sewell DK
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 Feb; 31(1):1-31. PubMed ID: 37507646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Conditional accuracy in response interference tasks: Evidence from the Eriksen flanker task and the spatial conflict task.
    Stins JF; Polderman JC; Boomsma DI; de Geus EJ
    Adv Cogn Psychol; 2008 Jul; 3(3):409-17. PubMed ID: 20517524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modulating proactive cognitive control by reward: differential anticipatory effects of performance-contingent and non-contingent rewards.
    Yamaguchi M; Nishimura A
    Psychol Res; 2019 Mar; 83(2):258-274. PubMed ID: 29855699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reward does not modulate corticospinal excitability in anticipation of a Stroop trial.
    Bundt C; Boehler CN; Verbruggen F; Brass M; Notebaert W
    Eur J Neurosci; 2021 Feb; 53(4):1019-1028. PubMed ID: 33222331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Distributional analyses reveal the individual differences in congruency sequence effect.
    Tang D; Chen X; Li H; Lei Y
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(8):e0272621. PubMed ID: 35994475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Conflict resolution in the Eriksen flanker task: Similarities and differences to the Simon task.
    Hübner R; Töbel L
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0214203. PubMed ID: 30921368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance-contingent reward increases the use of congruent distracting information.
    Fröber K; Lerche V
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Apr; 85(3):905-929. PubMed ID: 36918512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Electrophysiological correlates of proportion congruency manipulation in a temporal flanker task.
    Jost K; Wendt M; Luna-Rodriguez A; Jacobsen T
    Psychophysiology; 2022 Nov; 59(11):e14092. PubMed ID: 35569101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Eriksen flanker delta plot shapes depend on the stimulus.
    Pratte MS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Feb; 83(2):685-699. PubMed ID: 33155124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.