These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38916476)

  • 1. Toward a semi-supervised learning approach to phylogenetic estimation.
    Silvestro D; Latrille T; Salamin N
    Syst Biol; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38916476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bayesian and maximum likelihood phylogenetic analyses of protein sequence data under relative branch-length differences and model violation.
    Mar JC; Harlow TJ; Ragan MA
    BMC Evol Biol; 2005 Jan; 5():8. PubMed ID: 15676079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The gene tree delusion.
    Springer MS; Gatesy J
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2016 Jan; 94(Pt A):1-33. PubMed ID: 26238460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Branch length estimation and divergence dating: estimates of error in Bayesian and maximum likelihood frameworks.
    Schwartz RS; Mueller RL
    BMC Evol Biol; 2010 Jan; 10():5. PubMed ID: 20064267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sequential Bayesian Phylogenetic Inference.
    Höhna S; Hsiang AY
    Syst Biol; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38771253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. More on the Best Evolutionary Rate for Phylogenetic Analysis.
    Klopfstein S; Massingham T; Goldman N
    Syst Biol; 2017 Sep; 66(5):769-785. PubMed ID: 28595363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A scalability study of phylogenetic network inference methods using empirical datasets and simulations involving a single reticulation.
    Hejase HA; Liu KJ
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Oct; 17(1):422. PubMed ID: 27737628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evidence of Statistical Inconsistency of Phylogenetic Methods in the Presence of Multiple Sequence Alignment Uncertainty.
    Md Mukarram Hossain AS; Blackburne BP; Shah A; Whelan S
    Genome Biol Evol; 2015 Jul; 7(8):2102-16. PubMed ID: 26139831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluating the robustness of phylogenetic methods to among-site variability in substitution processes.
    Holder MT; Zwickl DJ; Dessimoz C
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2008 Dec; 363(1512):4013-21. PubMed ID: 18852108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Maximum likelihood estimates of species trees: how accuracy of phylogenetic inference depends upon the divergence history and sampling design.
    McCormack JE; Huang H; Knowles LL
    Syst Biol; 2009 Oct; 58(5):501-8. PubMed ID: 20525604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of models for nucleotide substitution used in maximum-likelihood phylogenetic estimation.
    Yang Z; Goldman N; Friday A
    Mol Biol Evol; 1994 Mar; 11(2):316-24. PubMed ID: 8170371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inferring demographic parameters in bacterial genomic data using Bayesian and hybrid phylogenetic methods.
    Duchene S; Duchene DA; Geoghegan JL; Dyson ZA; Hawkey J; Holt KE
    BMC Evol Biol; 2018 Jun; 18(1):95. PubMed ID: 29914372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. mPartition: A Model-Based Method for Partitioning Alignments.
    Le Kim T; Le Sy V
    J Mol Evol; 2020 Nov; 88(8-9):641-652. PubMed ID: 32864711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ancestral inference and the study of codon bias evolution: implications for molecular evolutionary analyses of the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup.
    Akashi H; Goel P; John A
    PLoS One; 2007 Oct; 2(10):e1065. PubMed ID: 17957249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bayesian coestimation of phylogeny and sequence alignment.
    Lunter G; Miklós I; Drummond A; Jensen JL; Hein J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Apr; 6():83. PubMed ID: 15804354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony and likelihood methods.
    Yang Z
    J Mol Evol; 1996 Feb; 42(2):294-307. PubMed ID: 8919881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Markov-Modulated Continuous-Time Markov Chains to Identify Site- and Branch-Specific Evolutionary Variation in BEAST.
    Baele G; Gill MS; Bastide P; Lemey P; Suchard MA
    Syst Biol; 2021 Jan; 70(1):181-189. PubMed ID: 32415977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Limits of the Constant-rate Birth-Death Prior for Phylogenetic Tree Topology Inference.
    Khurana MP; Scheidwasser-Clow N; Penn MJ; Bhatt S; Duchêne DA
    Syst Biol; 2024 May; 73(1):235-246. PubMed ID: 38153910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Exploring among-site rate variation models in a maximum likelihood framework using empirical data: effects of model assumptions on estimates of topology, branch lengths, and bootstrap support.
    Buckley TR; Simon C; Chambers GK
    Syst Biol; 2001 Feb; 50(1):67-86. PubMed ID: 12116595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of ambiguous data on phylogenetic estimates obtained by maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference.
    Lemmon AR; Brown JM; Stanger-Hall K; Lemmon EM
    Syst Biol; 2009 Feb; 58(1):130-45. PubMed ID: 20525573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.