These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38916682)

  • 1. Mechanical and biological properties of polymer materials for oral appliances produced with additive 3D printing and subtractive CAD-CAM techniques compared to conventional methods: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Valenti C; Federici MI; Coniglio M; Betti P; Pancrazi GP; Tulli O; Masciotti F; Nanussi A; Pagano S
    Clin Oral Investig; 2024 Jun; 28(7):396. PubMed ID: 38916682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mechanical properties of 3D printed prosthetic materials compared with milled and conventional processing: A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies.
    Valenti C; Isabella Federici M; Masciotti F; Marinucci L; Xhimitiku I; Cianetti S; Pagano S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Aug; 132(2):381-391. PubMed ID: 35934576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Physical, Mechanical, and Anti-Biofilm Formation Properties of CAD-CAM Milled or 3D Printed Denture Base Resins: In Vitro Analysis.
    Freitas RFCP; Duarte S; Feitosa S; Dutra V; Lin WS; Panariello BHD; Carreiro ADFP
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Apr; 32(S1):38-44. PubMed ID: 35661475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Physical and Mechanical Properties of 3D-Printed Provisional Crowns and Fixed Dental Prosthesis Resins Compared to CAD/CAM Milled and Conventional Provisional Resins: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Jain S; Sayed ME; Shetty M; Alqahtani SM; Al Wadei MHD; Gupta SG; Othman AAA; Alshehri AH; Alqarni H; Mobarki AH; Motlaq K; Bakmani HF; Zain AA; Hakami AJ; Sheayria MF
    Polymers (Basel); 2022 Jun; 14(13):. PubMed ID: 35808735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mechanical properties of polymethyl methacrylate as a denture base: Conventional versus CAD-CAM resin - A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies.
    de Oliveira Limírio JPJ; Gomes JML; Alves Rezende MCR; Lemos CAA; Rosa CDDRD; Pellizzer EP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Dec; 128(6):1221-1229. PubMed ID: 34030891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of smokeless tobacco on color stability and surface roughness of CAD/CAM milled, 3D printed, and conventional provisional crown and fixed dental prosthesis materials: An in vitro study.
    Sayed ME; Jain S; Jokhadar HF; Alshahrani AA; AlResayes SS; Alqahtani SM; Alqarni H; Anab NA; Alsubeaie NH; Alsubaie SH; Khalid A; Franco R; Minervini G
    Technol Health Care; 2024; 32(3):1697-1711. PubMed ID: 37694329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Characterization of occlusal splint materials: CAD-CAM versus conventional resins.
    Gibreel M; Perea-Lowery L; Vallittu PK; Lassila L
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Dec; 124():104813. PubMed ID: 34530298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Experimental Study on Mechanical Properties of Different Resins Used in Oral Environments.
    Baciu ER; Savin CN; Tatarciuc M; Mârțu I; Butnaru OM; Aungurencei AE; Mihalache AM; Diaconu-Popa D
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2023 May; 59(6):. PubMed ID: 37374246
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. CAD-CAM removable complete dentures: A systematic review and meta-analysis of trueness of fit, biocompatibility, mechanical properties, surface characteristics, color stability, time-cost analysis, clinical and patient-reported outcomes.
    Srinivasan M; Kamnoedboon P; McKenna G; Angst L; Schimmel M; Özcan M; Müller F
    J Dent; 2021 Oct; 113():103777. PubMed ID: 34400250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Two-body wear and surface hardness of occlusal splint materials.
    Gibreel M; Perea-Lowery L; Vallittu PK; Garoushi S; Lassila L
    Dent Mater J; 2022 Nov; 41(6):916-922. PubMed ID: 36288940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of Mechanical Properties of 3D-Printed, CAD/CAM, and Conventional Denture Base Materials.
    Prpić V; Schauperl Z; Ćatić A; Dulčić N; Čimić S
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Jul; 29(6):524-528. PubMed ID: 32270904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Additive Manufacturing of Dental Ceramics: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Al Hamad KQ; Al-Rashdan BA; Ayyad JQ; Al Omrani LM; Sharoh AM; Al Nimri AM; Al-Kaff FT
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Oct; 31(8):e67-e86. PubMed ID: 35675133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Flexural Properties and Hardness of CAD-CAM Denture Base Materials.
    Fouda SM; Gad MM; Abualsaud R; Ellakany P; AlRumaih HS; Khan SQ; Akhtar S; Al-Qarni FD; Al-Harbi FA
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Apr; 32(4):318-324. PubMed ID: 35567362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Wear resistance and flexural properties of low force SLA- and DLP-printed splint materials in different printing orientations: An in vitro study.
    Simeon P; Unkovskiy A; Saadat Sarmadi B; Nicic R; Koch PJ; Beuer F; Schmidt F
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2024 Apr; 152():106458. PubMed ID: 38364445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of various surface treatments on the repair bond strength of denture bases produced by digital and conventional methods.
    Sahin Z; Ozer NE; Akan T; Kılıcarslan MA; Karaagaclıoglu L
    Odontology; 2024 Jul; 112(3):782-797. PubMed ID: 38157108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mechanical and physical properties of splint materials for oral appliances produced by additive, subtractive and conventional manufacturing.
    Maleki T; Meinen J; Coldea A; Reymus M; Edelhoff D; Stawarczyk B
    Dent Mater; 2024 Aug; 40(8):1171-1183. PubMed ID: 38851965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mechanical performance of 3-dimensionally printed resins compared with conventional and milled resins for the manufacture of occlusal devices: A systematic review.
    de Paula Lopez V; Dias Corpa Tardelli J; Botelho AL; Marcondes Agnelli JA; Cândido Dos Reis A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 36631367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of wear behaviour of various occlusal splint materials and manufacturing processes.
    Grymak A; Waddell JN; Aarts JM; Ma S; Choi JJE
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2022 Feb; 126():105053. PubMed ID: 34998068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of repair and surface treatments on the strength of digitally fabricated resin-based dental prostheses: A systematic review of in vitro studies.
    Gad MM; Abualsaud R
    J Dent; 2024 Feb; 141():104806. PubMed ID: 38154701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Factors affecting flexural strength of 3D-printed resins: A systematic review.
    Gad MM; Fouda SM
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Apr; 32(S1):96-110. PubMed ID: 36629333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.