These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38916779)

  • 1. The FreiBurger: a new optotype for P300-based acuity estimation.
    Duval CZ; Kaczan SB; Heinrich SP
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2024 Oct; 149(2):87-98. PubMed ID: 38916779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Event-Related Potentials Allow for Optotype-Based Objective Acuity Estimation.
    Heinrich SP; Lüth I; Bach M
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2015 Apr; 56(4):2184-91. PubMed ID: 25744983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. P300-based acuity estimation in imitated amblyopia.
    Beusterien ML; Heinrich SP
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2018 Feb; 136(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 29134296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Resolution acuity versus recognition acuity with Landolt-style optotypes.
    Heinrich SP; Bach M
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2013 Sep; 251(9):2235-41. PubMed ID: 23828648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Construction and Validation of LEA Hindi Chart: A Multicenter Study.
    Datta S; Varadharajan S; Mazumdar D; Narayanan A; Monira S; Panda S; Hyvärinen L; Satgunam P
    Optom Vis Sci; 2020 May; 97(5):351-359. PubMed ID: 32413007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Comparison of visual acuity measurement with Landolt rings versus numbers].
    Rohrschneider K; Spittler AR; Bach M
    Ophthalmologe; 2019 Nov; 116(11):1058-1063. PubMed ID: 30927070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of contrast sensitivity and sweep visual evoked potential (sVEP) acuity estimates in normal humans.
    Ridder WH
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2019 Dec; 139(3):207-219. PubMed ID: 31414313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of a visual acuity test using closed Landolt-Cs to determine malingering.
    Kröger N; Jürgens C; Kohlmann T; Tost F
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2017 Dec; 255(12):2459-2465. PubMed ID: 29046952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Computer monitor pixellation and Landolt C visual acuity.
    Carkeet A; Lister L; Goh YT
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2021 Nov; 41(6):1176-1182. PubMed ID: 34533231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of LogMAR Eye charts with angular vision for visually impaired: the Berkeley rudimentary vision test vs LogMAR One target Landolt ring Eye chart.
    Miwa M; Iwanami M; Oba MS; Mizuki N; Nishida T
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2013 Dec; 251(12):2761-7. PubMed ID: 24057176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Discrimination of paediatric acuity test optotypes by 6-year-old children.
    Hussaindeen JR; Ramakrishnan B; Ravi A; SundarRaj M; Rakshit A; Nosofsky RM; Candy TR
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2023 Sep; 43(5):964-971. PubMed ID: 37272135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. "Cognitive" visual acuity estimation based on the event-related potential P300 component.
    Heinrich SP; Marhöfer D; Bach M
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Sep; 121(9):1464-1472. PubMed ID: 20399706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. VEP-based acuity assessment in low vision.
    Hoffmann MB; Brands J; Behrens-Baumann W; Bach M
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2017 Dec; 135(3):209-218. PubMed ID: 28980154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optotype and grating visual acuity in preschool children.
    Stiers P; Vanderkelen R; Vandenbussche E
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2003 Sep; 44(9):4123-30. PubMed ID: 12939336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [New DIN and ISO norms for determination of visual acuity].
    Wesemann W; Heinrich SP; Jägle H; Schiefer U; Bach M
    Ophthalmologe; 2020 Jan; 117(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 31346702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contour interaction in the preschool child.
    Fern KD; Manny RE; Davis JR; Gibson RR
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1986 May; 63(5):313-8. PubMed ID: 3717283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Imitating the effect of amblyopia on VEP-based acuity estimates.
    Heinrich SP; Bock CM; Bach M
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2016 Dec; 133(3):183-187. PubMed ID: 27864655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Objective measurement of visual resolution using the P300 to self-facial images.
    Marhöfer DJ; Bach M; Heinrich SP
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2015 Oct; 131(2):137-48. PubMed ID: 25976745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Comparison of visual acuity measured using Landolt-C and ETDRS charts in healthy subjects and patients with various eye diseases].
    Becker R; Teichler G; Gräf M
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2011 Oct; 228(10):864-7. PubMed ID: 21997822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Detection of nonorganic visual loss with a new optotype chart in simulated malingerers.
    Flueckiger P; Mojon DS
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2003 Mar; 220(3):89-92. PubMed ID: 12664354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.