These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Shaping pre-modern digital terrain models: The former topography at Charlemagne's canal construction site. Schmidt J; Werther L; Zielhofer C PLoS One; 2018; 13(7):e0200167. PubMed ID: 29975746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Using Lidar and Radar measurements to constrain predictions of forest ecosystem structure and function. Antonarakis AS; Saatchi SS; Chazdon RL; Moorcroft PR Ecol Appl; 2011 Jun; 21(4):1120-37. PubMed ID: 21774418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Use of an airborne lidar system to model plant species composition and diversity of Mediterranean oak forests. Simonson WD; Allen HD; Coomes DA Conserv Biol; 2012 Oct; 26(5):840-50. PubMed ID: 22731687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Application of Ground-Based LiDAR for Analysing Oil Palm Canopy Properties on the Occurrence of Basal Stem Rot (BSR) Disease. Husin NA; Khairunniza-Bejo S; Abdullah AF; Kassim MSM; Ahmad D; Azmi ANN Sci Rep; 2020 Apr; 10(1):6464. PubMed ID: 32296108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Geospatial revolution and remote sensing LiDAR in Mesoamerican archaeology. Chase AF; Chase DZ; Fisher CT; Leisz SJ; Weishampel JF Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2012 Aug; 109(32):12916-21. PubMed ID: 22802623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Country-wide data of ecosystem structure from the third Dutch airborne laser scanning survey. Kissling WD; Shi Y; Koma Z; Meijer C; Ku O; Nattino F; Seijmonsbergen AC; Grootes MW Data Brief; 2023 Feb; 46():108798. PubMed ID: 36569534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Remote sensing of ecosystem health: opportunities, challenges, and future perspectives. Li Z; Xu D; Guo X Sensors (Basel); 2014 Nov; 14(11):21117-39. PubMed ID: 25386759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. New Opportunities for Forest Remote Sensing Through Ultra-High-Density Drone Lidar. Kellner JR; Armston J; Birrer M; Cushman KC; Duncanson L; Eck C; Falleger C; Imbach B; Král K; Krůček M; Trochta J; Vrška T; Zgraggen C Surv Geophys; 2019; 40(4):959-977. PubMed ID: 31395993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of LiDAR point density, sampling size and height threshold on estimation accuracy of crop biophysical parameters. Luo S; Chen JM; Wang C; Xi X; Zeng H; Peng D; Li D Opt Express; 2016 May; 24(11):11578-93. PubMed ID: 27410085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Overstory-understory land cover mapping at the watershed scale: accuracy enhancement by multitemporal remote sensing analysis and LiDAR. Fragoso-Campón L; Quirós E; Mora J; Gutiérrez Gallego JA; Durán-Barroso P Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Jan; 27(1):75-88. PubMed ID: 30783926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mapping and exploring variation in post-fire vegetation recovery following mixed severity wildfire using airborne LiDAR. Gordon CE; Price OF; Tasker EM Ecol Appl; 2017 Jul; 27(5):1618-1632. PubMed ID: 28390084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Small unmanned aerial vehicles for low-altitude remote sensing and its application progress in ecology.]. Sun ZY; Chen YQ; Yang L; Tang GL; Yuan SX; Lin ZW Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2017 Feb; 28(2):528-536. PubMed ID: 29749161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Remote sensing for restoration ecology: Application for restoring degraded, damaged, transformed, or destroyed ecosystems. Reif MK; Theel HJ Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Jul; 13(4):614-630. PubMed ID: 27627787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bridging gaps: On the performance of airborne LiDAR to model wood mouse-habitat structure relationships in pine forests. Jaime-González C; Acebes P; Mateos A; Mezquida ET PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0182451. PubMed ID: 28771566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]