These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. In vivo comparison of MRI- and CBCT-based 3D cephalometric analysis: beginning of a non-ionizing diagnostic era in craniomaxillofacial imaging? Juerchott A; Freudlsperger C; Weber D; Jende JME; Saleem MA; Zingler S; Lux CJ; Bendszus M; Heiland S; Hilgenfeld T Eur Radiol; 2020 Mar; 30(3):1488-1497. PubMed ID: 31802215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Newly defined landmarks for a three-dimensionally based cephalometric analysis: a retrospective cone-beam computed tomography scan review. Lee M; Kanavakis G; Miner RM Angle Orthod; 2015 Jan; 85(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 24866835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of 3D cephalometric measurements based on an automatic knowledge-based landmark detection algorithm. Gupta A; Kharbanda OP; Sardana V; Balachandran R; Sardana HK Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2016 Jul; 11(7):1297-309. PubMed ID: 26704370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Automatic 3-dimensional cephalometric landmarking based on active shape models in related projections. Montúfar J; Romero M; Scougall-Vilchis RJ Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Mar; 153(3):449-458. PubMed ID: 29501121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Automatic cephalometric landmark identification with artificial intelligence: An umbrella review of systematic reviews. Polizzi A; Leonardi R J Dent; 2024 Jul; 146():105056. PubMed ID: 38729291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Precision of identifying cephalometric landmarks with cone beam computed tomography in vivo. Hassan B; Nijkamp P; Verheij H; Tairie J; Vink C; van der Stelt P; van Beek H Eur J Orthod; 2013 Feb; 35(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 21447781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vivo reliability of 3D cephalometric landmark determination on magnetic resonance imaging: a feasibility study. Juerchott A; Freudlsperger C; Zingler S; Saleem MA; Jende JME; Lux CJ; Bendszus M; Heiland S; Hilgenfeld T Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Mar; 24(3):1339-1349. PubMed ID: 31352517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A semi-supervised learning approach for automated 3D cephalometric landmark identification using computed tomography. Yun HS; Hyun CM; Baek SH; Lee SH; Seo JK PLoS One; 2022; 17(9):e0275114. PubMed ID: 36170279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hybrid approach for automatic cephalometric landmark annotation on cone-beam computed tomography volumes. Montúfar J; Romero M; Scougall-Vilchis RJ Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Jul; 154(1):140-150. PubMed ID: 29957312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative study of cephalometric measurements using 3 imaging modalities. Wen J; Liu S; Ye X; Xie X; Li J; Li H; Mei L J Am Dent Assoc; 2017 Dec; 148(12):913-921. PubMed ID: 29042006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy and reliability of automatic three-dimensional cephalometric landmarking. Dot G; Rafflenbeul F; Arbotto M; Gajny L; Rouch P; Schouman T Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Oct; 49(10):1367-1378. PubMed ID: 32169306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Automatic localization of three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks on CBCT images by extracting symmetry features of the skull. Neelapu BC; Kharbanda OP; Sardana V; Gupta A; Vasamsetti S; Balachandran R; Sardana HK Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2018 Feb; 47(2):20170054. PubMed ID: 28845693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Divergence between CBCT and Optical Scans for Soft Tissue Analysis and Cephalometry in Facial Imaging: A cross-sectional study on healthy adults. Farronato M; Cenzato N; Crispino R; Tartaglia FC; Biagi R; Baldini B; Maspero C Int Orthod; 2024 Jun; 22(2):100845. PubMed ID: 38350255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Can artificial intelligence-driven cephalometric analysis replace manual tracing? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hendrickx J; Gracea RS; Vanheers M; Winderickx N; Preda F; Shujaat S; Jacobs R Eur J Orthod; 2024 Aug; 46(4):. PubMed ID: 38895901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cephalometric and three-dimensional assessment of the posterior airway space and imaging software reliability analysis before and after orthognathic surgery. Burkhard JP; Dietrich AD; Jacobsen C; Roos M; Lübbers HT; Obwegeser JA J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 42(7):1428-36. PubMed ID: 24864074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of observer reliability of three-dimensional cephalometric landmark identification on subject images from Galileos and i-CAT cone beam CT. Katkar RA; Kummet C; Dawson D; Moreno Uribe L; Allareddy V; Finkelstein M; Ruprecht A Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(9):20130059. PubMed ID: 23833319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The reliability of cephalometric measurements in oral and maxillofacial imaging: Cone beam computed tomography versus two-dimensional digital cephalograms. Hariharan A; Diwakar NR; Jayanthi K; Hema HM; Deepukrishna S; Ghaste SR Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(4):370-377. PubMed ID: 27723632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]