These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38918032)

  • 61. State Abortion Restrictions and the New Supreme Court: Women's Access to Reproductive Health Services.
    Reingold RB; Gostin LO
    JAMA; 2019 Jul; 322(1):21-22. PubMed ID: 31166573
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. A national medical malpractice reform act (and why the Supreme Court may prefer to avoid it).
    Razook N
    Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 2006 Feb; (322):9-36. PubMed ID: 16688930
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. The Supreme Court and the future of Medicaid.
    Jost TS; Rosenbaum S
    N Engl J Med; 2012 Sep; 367(11):983-5. PubMed ID: 22830436
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Reframing federalism--the Affordable Care Act (and broccoli) in the Supreme Court.
    Mariner WK; Glantz LH; Annas GJ
    N Engl J Med; 2012 Sep; 367(12):1154-8. PubMed ID: 22809363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Stenberg v Carhart: a divided US Supreme Court debates partial birth abortion.
    Heffernan L
    Mod Law Rev; 2001 Jul; 64(4):618-27. PubMed ID: 16538739
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. The 'sleeper' issues before the Supreme Court as it reviews the Affordable Care Act.
    Goldman TR
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2012 Mar; 31(3):471-4. PubMed ID: 22392656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Four-one-four.
    Annas GJ
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1989; 19(5):27-9. PubMed ID: 2793440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. The Supreme Court and Baby Jane Doe.
    Drinan RF
    America (NY); 1986 Mar; 154(9):180-2. PubMed ID: 11658666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. The impact of the recent Supreme Court rulings in Pegram and Rush Prudential on state regulation of managed care organizations.
    Trueman DL
    J Health Law; 2003; 36(1):107-32. PubMed ID: 12784923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Medical marijuana, American federalism, and the Supreme Court.
    Gostin LO
    JAMA; 2005 Aug; 294(7):842-4. PubMed ID: 16106011
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Webster and the politics of abortion.
    Annas GJ
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1989; 19(2):36-8. PubMed ID: 2703338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. United States Supreme Court and abortion: part 2.
    Holman EJ
    JAMA; 1973 Jul; 225(3):343-4. PubMed ID: 11643547
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Meeting the unique health-care needs of LGBTQ people.
    Lancet; 2016 Jan; 387(10014):95. PubMed ID: 26841978
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. State sovereign standing: often overlooked, but not forgotten.
    Cuccinelli KT; Getchell ED; Russell WG
    Stanford Law Rev; 2012 Jan; 64(1):89-124. PubMed ID: 22363959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Transparency and the Supreme Court--Can Employers Refuse to Disclose How Much They Pay for Health Care?
    Bagley N; Koller C
    N Engl J Med; 2015 Dec; 373(27):e34. PubMed ID: 26605801
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. The Supreme Court and bedside rationing.
    Bloche MG; Jacobson PD
    JAMA; 2000 Dec; 284(21):2776-9. PubMed ID: 11105185
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Abortion law in the United States: the untoward Christian reaction to recent Supreme Court decisions.
    Crawford J
    Law Justice; 1974 19-32, Hilary 42:; No():. PubMed ID: 11663577
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Affordable Care Act litigation: the Supreme Court and the future of health care reform.
    Gostin LO; Garcia KK
    JAMA; 2012 Jan; 307(4):369-70. PubMed ID: 22274682
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Supreme Court to review Kentucky 'any-willing-provider' law.
    Sfikas PM
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2002 Sep; 133(9):1281-2. PubMed ID: 12356260
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Supreme Court ruling may determine the future of state-based professionai licensing.
    Owsiany DJ
    J Am Coll Dent; 2014; 81(4):51-5. PubMed ID: 25975126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.