These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3891980)

  • 1. Relationship of syringe-tip diameter to voids in elastomer impressions.
    Stackhouse JA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1985 Jun; 53(6):812-5. PubMed ID: 3891980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A study of bubbles in a rubber elastomer manipulated under clinical conditions.
    Stackhouse JA; Harris WT; Mansour RM; Von Hagen S
    J Prosthet Dent; 1987 May; 57(5):591-6. PubMed ID: 3298629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of operator variability on void formation in impressions made with an automixed addition silicone.
    Lim KC; Chong YH; Soh G
    Aust Dent J; 1992 Feb; 37(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 1567292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Individual trays for impressions using elastomers].
    Wirz J; Castagnola L; Garberoglio U
    Riv Odontoiatr Amici Brugg; 1982; 1(3):215-21. PubMed ID: 6761613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effectiveness of intraoral delivery tips in reducing voids in elastomeric impressions.
    Chong YH; Soh G
    Quintessence Int; 1991 Nov; 22(11):897-900. PubMed ID: 1812513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of interchanging automatic mixing tips on void formation for an automixed addition silicone impression.
    Chong YH; Soh G; Lim KC
    Am J Dent; 1991 Jun; 4(3):127-9. PubMed ID: 1863433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of loading and syringing on void formation in automixed addition silicone elastomers.
    Chong YH; Soh G; Lim KC
    J Oral Rehabil; 1993 Nov; 20(6):631-6. PubMed ID: 10412486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of six impression syringes.
    Kishimoto M; Shillingburg HT; Duncanson MG
    J Prosthet Dent; 1980 May; 43(5):546-51. PubMed ID: 6988583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. 3M Intraoral Impression Syringe.
    Ching K
    Hawaii Dent Assoc J; 2016; ():22-3. PubMed ID: 27265960
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of implant placement depth and impression material on the stability of an open tray impression coping.
    Linkevicius T; Svediene O; Vindasiute E; Puisys A; Linkeviciene L
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Oct; 108(4):238-43. PubMed ID: 23031730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An in vivo investigation of seating and removal forces associated with recording impressions in dentate patients.
    Sotiriou M; Hobkirk JA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Nov; 74(5):455-62. PubMed ID: 8809249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.
    Caputi S; Varvara G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Experimental study on the use of spacer foils in two-step putty and wash impression procedures using silicone impression materials.
    Mann K; Davids A; Range U; Richter G; Boening K; Reitemeier B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Apr; 113(4):316-22. PubMed ID: 25453563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relationship between critical convergence angle and surface defects in stone casts.
    Soh G; Chong YH
    Quintessence Int; 1990 Aug; 21(8):675-9. PubMed ID: 2094872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impression trifecta: three tools and tips for better impressions.
    Gottlieb M; Fagin M
    Todays FDA; 2011; 23(3):57-61. PubMed ID: 21568211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of the type and technique used for impression making on the accuracy of elastomeric impression materials.
    Habib AN; Shehata MT
    Egypt Dent J; 1995 Oct; 41(4):1409-16. PubMed ID: 9497690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of one-step versus two-step putty wash addition silicone impression technique.
    Hung SH; Purk JH; Tira DE; Eick JD
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 May; 67(5):583-9. PubMed ID: 1527737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of irreversible hydrocolloid impression material to correct a defect in complete denture definitive impressions.
    Oh WS; Park JM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Mar; 113(3):255-6. PubMed ID: 25444280
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Factors affecting the accuracy of elastometric impression materials.
    Chen SY; Liang WM; Chen FN
    J Dent; 2004 Nov; 32(8):603-9. PubMed ID: 15476954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vitro study of the number of surface defects in monophase and two-phase addition silicone impressions.
    Millar BJ; Dunne SM; Robinson PB
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Jul; 80(1):32-5. PubMed ID: 9656175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.