These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3891980)

  • 21. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
    Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effect of tray selection, viscosity of impression material, and sequence of pour on the accuracy of dies made from dual-arch impressions.
    Ceyhan JA; Johnson GH; Lepe X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Aug; 90(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 12886207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Time-dependent accuracy of elastomer impression materials. Part I: Condensation silicones.
    Lacy AM; Bellman T; Fukui H; Jendresen MD
    J Prosthet Dent; 1981 Feb; 45(2):209-15. PubMed ID: 7009840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. An in vitro study on the dimensional stability of a vinyl polyether silicone impression material over a prolonged storage period.
    Nassar U; Oko A; Adeeb S; El-Rich M; Flores-Mir C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Mar; 109(3):172-8. PubMed ID: 23522366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Plastic trays and accurate impressions.
    Wassell RW
    Br Dent J; 1998 Mar; 184(6):266. PubMed ID: 9581358
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Disposables in todays dental practice. Presentation of a new disposable syringe for rubber and hydrocolloid impressions].
    Sjödahl CJ
    Sver Tandlakarforb Tidn; 1968 Dec; 60(24):1115-9. PubMed ID: 4905465
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation of defects in surface detail for monophase, 2-phase, and 3-phase impression techniques: an in vitro study.
    Varvara G; Murmura G; Sinjari B; Cardelli P; Caputi S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Feb; 113(2):108-13. PubMed ID: 25438741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Pre- and post-set hydrophilicity of elastomeric impression materials.
    Michalakis KX; Bakopoulou A; Hirayama H; Garefis DP; Garefis PD
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):238-48. PubMed ID: 17559537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Dimensional accuracy of 2-stage putty-wash impressions: influence of impression trays and viscosity.
    Balkenhol M; Ferger P; Wöstmann B
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(6):573-5. PubMed ID: 18069363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Reproduction of intra-radicular surface anatomy of extracted human teeth: comparison of three different materials using injection technique.
    Sultana A; Rahman MM; Rahman MM; Shrestha P
    Mymensingh Med J; 2010 Apr; 19(2):181-4. PubMed ID: 20395909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Impressions].
    Laverman JV
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1991 Oct; 98(10):403-7. PubMed ID: 1820536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Surface texture of stone model setting against elastomer impression materials.
    Nanami T; Ostlund SG
    Swed Dent J; 1984; 8(5):251-5. PubMed ID: 6395418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Efficacy of tray adhesives for the adhesion of elastomer rubber impression materials to impression modeling plastics for border molding.
    Nishigawa G; Sato T; Suenaga K; Minagi S
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Feb; 79(2):140-4. PubMed ID: 9513098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The dimensional accuracy of four impression techniques with the use of addition silicone impression materials.
    Al-Bakri IA; Hussey D; Al-Omari WM
    J Clin Dent; 2007; 18(2):29-33. PubMed ID: 17508620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Bond strength of three nonaqueous elastomeric impression materials to a light-activated resin tray.
    Payne JA; Pereira BP
    Int J Prosthodont; 1992; 5(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 1520444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Issues in handling impression materials.
    Giordano R
    Gen Dent; 2000; 48(6):646-8. PubMed ID: 12004656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The matrix impression system for fixed prosthodontics.
    Livaditis GJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Feb; 79(2):208-16. PubMed ID: 9513108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Studies on the new combined impression method with different types of silicone impression materials].
    Yamamoto T; Osano M; Seki S; Kikkawa H; Hanamura N
    Tsurumi Shigaku; 1980 Jun; 6(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 7006174
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Distortion of disposable plastic stock trays when used with putty vinyl polysiloxane impression materials.
    Cho GC; Chee WW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Oct; 92(4):354-8. PubMed ID: 15507908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The plastic cap--an improved technique for impression taking.
    Fitzig S; Eli I
    J Oral Rehabil; 1988 Jan; 15(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 3279172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.