These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38920771)

  • 41. Euclidean Mate Value and Power of Choice on the Mating Market.
    Conroy-Beam D
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2018 Feb; 44(2):252-264. PubMed ID: 29082804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. What's in a kiss? The effect of romantic kissing on mating desirability.
    Wlodarski R; Dunbar RI
    Evol Psychol; 2014 Mar; 12(1):178-99. PubMed ID: 25299759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Endorsement of Social and Personal Values Predicts the Desirability of Men and Women as Long-Term Partners.
    Lopes GS; Barbaro N; Sela Y; Jeffery AJ; Pham MN; Shackelford TK; Zeigler-Hill V
    Evol Psychol; 2017; 15(4):1474704917742384. PubMed ID: 29152995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Mate choice in modern societies : Testing evolutionary hypotheses with behavioral data.
    Pérusse D
    Hum Nat; 1994 Sep; 5(3):255-78. PubMed ID: 24214626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Changes in women's mate preferences across the ovulatory cycle.
    Gangestad SW; Garver-Apgar CE; Simpson JA; Cousins AJ
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2007 Jan; 92(1):151-63. PubMed ID: 17201549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Relationship dealbreakers: traits people avoid in potential mates.
    Jonason PK; Garcia JR; Webster GD; Li NP; Fisher HE
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2015 Dec; 41(12):1697-711. PubMed ID: 26445853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Resources, attractiveness, family commitment; reproductive decisions in human mate choice.
    Bereczkei T; Voros S; Gal A; Bernath L
    Ethology; 1997 Aug; 103(8):681-99. PubMed ID: 12293453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Netflix and Chill? What Sex Differences Can Tell Us About Mate Preferences in (Hypothetical) Booty-Call Relationships.
    March E; Van Doorn G; Grieve R
    Evol Psychol; 2018; 16(4):1474704918812138. PubMed ID: 30428700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Being More Educated and Earning More Increases Romantic Interest: Data from 1.8 M Online Daters from 24 Nations.
    Jonason PK; Thomas AG
    Hum Nat; 2022 Jun; 33(2):115-131. PubMed ID: 35380344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The health of a nation predicts their mate preferences: cross-cultural variation in women's preferences for masculinized male faces.
    DeBruine LM; Jones BC; Crawford JR; Welling LL; Little AC
    Proc Biol Sci; 2010 Aug; 277(1692):2405-10. PubMed ID: 20236978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Predicting romantic interest and decisions in the very early stages of mate selection: standards, accuracy, and sex differences.
    Fletcher GJ; Kerr PS; Li NP; Valentine KA
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2014 Apr; 40(4):540-50. PubMed ID: 24501043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Health, Anticipated Partner Infidelity, and Jealousy in Men and Women.
    Arnocky S; Pearson M; Vaillancourt T
    Evol Psychol; 2015 Sep; 13(3):1474704915593666. PubMed ID: 37924190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Assortative mate preferences for height across short-term and long-term relationship contexts in a cross-cultural sample.
    Pisanski K; Fernandez-Alonso M; Díaz-Simón N; Oleszkiewicz A; Sardinas A; Pellegrino R; Estevez N; Mora EC; Luckett CR; Feinberg DR
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():937146. PubMed ID: 36092066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Factors predicting the probability of initiating sexual intercourse by context and sex.
    Grøntvedt TV; Kennair LE; Mehmetoglu M
    Scand J Psychol; 2015 Oct; 56(5):516-26. PubMed ID: 25929719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Direct selection on male attractiveness and female preference fails to produce a response.
    Hall M; Lindholm AK; Brooks R
    BMC Evol Biol; 2004 Jan; 4():1. PubMed ID: 14720309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Preferred and actual relative height among homosexual male partners vary with preferred dominance and sex role.
    Valentova JV; Stulp G; Třebický V; Havlíček J
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e86534. PubMed ID: 24466136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Testing the mate-choice hypothesis of the female orgasm: disentangling traits and behaviours.
    Sherlock JM; Sidari MJ; Harris EA; Barlow FK; Zietsch BP
    Socioaffect Neurosci Psychol; 2016; 6():31562. PubMed ID: 27791967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Sex and age differences in mate-selection preferences.
    Schwarz S; Hassebrauck M
    Hum Nat; 2012 Dec; 23(4):447-66. PubMed ID: 22941269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating.
    Buss DM; Schmitt DP
    Psychol Rev; 1993 Apr; 100(2):204-32. PubMed ID: 8483982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The value of physical attractiveness in romantic partners: modeling biological and social variables.
    Jonason PK
    J Soc Psychol; 2009 Apr; 149(2):229-40. PubMed ID: 19425359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.