114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38920883)
1. Impact of Different Glidepath Techniques on the Overall Performance of WaveOne Gold in an Artificial S-Shape Canal.
Lup VM; Marcu OA; Gaeta C; Ciavoi G
Dent J (Basel); 2024 Jun; 12(6):. PubMed ID: 38920883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of Glide Path Preparation on the Canal Shaping Times of WaveOne Gold in Curved Mandibular Molar Canals.
Vorster M; van der Vyver PJ; Paleker F
J Endod; 2018 May; 44(5):853-855. PubMed ID: 29550012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of Different Glide Path Files on Apical Debris Extrusion in Curved Root Canals.
Gunes B; Yesildal Yeter K
J Endod; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1191-1194. PubMed ID: 29884338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Micro-CT evaluation of rotary and reciprocating glide path and shaping systems outcomes in maxillary molar curved canals.
Alovisi M; Pasqualini D; Scotti N; Carpegna G; Comba A; Bernardi M; Tutino F; Dioguardi M; Berutti E
Odontology; 2022 Jan; 110(1):54-61. PubMed ID: 34173078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of different glide path techniques on the amount of extruded debris and preparation times during root canal preparation.
Kırıcı D; Koç S; Kuştarcı A
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects; 2020; 14(3):187-190. PubMed ID: 33408825
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of glide paths created with K-files, PathFiles, and the ProGlider file, and their effects on subsequent WaveOne preparation in curved canals.
Zheng L; Ji X; Li C; Zuo L; Wei X
BMC Oral Health; 2018 Aug; 18(1):152. PubMed ID: 30157822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cyclic fatigue resistance of the WaveOne Gold Glider, ProGlider, and the One G glide path instruments in double-curvature canals.
Kırıcı D; Kuştarcı A
Restor Dent Endod; 2019 Nov; 44(4):e36. PubMed ID: 31799164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cyclic fatigue resistance of R-Pilot, WaveOne Gold Glider, and ProGlider glide path instruments.
Keskin C; İnan U; Demiral M; Keleş A
Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Dec; 22(9):3007-3012. PubMed ID: 29455371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the effect of different glide path files on amount of apically extruded debris in curved root canals.
Kurt Ö; Zengin T; Üstün Y
Aust Endod J; 2023 Sep; 49 Suppl 1():359-365. PubMed ID: 36946545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Negotiability of mesiobuccal canals in maxillary first molars using different path file systems.
Gharechahi M; Khajehpour M; Hamedi A; Peighoun M
Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2023; 20():54. PubMed ID: 37304417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Apically extruded debris produced during glide path preparation using R-Pilot, WaveOne Gold Glider and ProGlider in curved root canals.
Keskin C; Sivas Yilmaz Ö; Inan U
Aust Endod J; 2020 Dec; 46(3):439-444. PubMed ID: 32820600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of Canal Transportation after Using Different Types Rotary Glide Path Files.
Shalan LA; Al-Huwaizi HF
Iran Endod J; 2018; 13(4):565-568. PubMed ID: 36883032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Canal transportation and centering ability of root canals prepared using rotary and reciprocating systems with and without PathFiles in cone-beam computed tomography-based three-dimensional molar prototypes.
Sunildath MS; Mathew J; George L; Vineet RV; Thomas P; John D
J Conserv Dent; 2021; 24(3):246-251. PubMed ID: 35035149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Canal Transportation and Centering Ability of WaveOne Gold in Combination with and without Different Glide Path Techniques.
Vorster M; van der Vyver PJ; Paleker F
J Endod; 2018 Sep; 44(9):1430-1435. PubMed ID: 30078574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Shaping ability of rotary and reciprocating single-file systems in combination with and without different glide path techniques in simulated curved canals.
Shi L; Yang Y; Wan J; Xie W; Yang R; Yao Y
J Dent Sci; 2022 Oct; 17(4):1520-1527. PubMed ID: 36299306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Effect of Different Molar Access Cavity Designs on Root Canal Shaping Times Using Rotation and Reciprocation Instruments in Mandibular First Molars.
Vorster M; van der Vyver PJ; Markou G
J Endod; 2022 Jul; 48(7):887-892. PubMed ID: 35398439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of shaping ability of different glide path instruments: a micro-computed tomography study.
Yeniçeri Özata M; Falakaloğlu S; Keleş A; Adıgüzel Ö; Gündoğar M
BMC Oral Health; 2023 Oct; 23(1):780. PubMed ID: 37875946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The influence of glide path preparation on the failure rate of WaveOne reciprocating instruments.
Jonker CH; Van der Vyver PJ; De Wet FA
SADJ; 2014 Jul; 69(6):266-9. PubMed ID: 26548201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the Shaping Ability of WaveOne Reciprocating Files with or without Glide Path in Simulated Curved S-shaped Root Canals.
Yilmaz A; Kucukay ES; Istektepe M; Sisli SN; Ersev H; Karagoz-Kucukay I
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent; 2017 Jun; 7(Suppl 1):S13-S17. PubMed ID: 28713762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of the Glide Path Establishment on the Torque Generation to the Files during Instrumentation: An In Vitro Measurement.
Kwak SW; Ha JH; Cheung GS; Kim HC; Kim SK
J Endod; 2018 Mar; 44(3):496-500. PubMed ID: 29203073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
