These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38922603)

  • 1. The interplay of social rank perceptions of Trump and Biden and emotions following the U.S. presidential election 2020.
    Boecker L; Petrowsky HM; Loschelder DD; Lange J
    Cogn Emot; 2024 Jun; ():1-19. PubMed ID: 38922603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Toward a Developmental Science of Politics.
    Patterson MM; Bigler RS; Pahlke E; Brown CS; Hayes AR; Ramirez MC; Nelson A
    Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 2019 Sep; 84(3):7-185. PubMed ID: 31503346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. When do people prefer dominant over prestigious political leaders?
    Jiménez ÁV; Flitton A; Mesoudi A
    Evol Hum Sci; 2021; 3():e16. PubMed ID: 37588522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. When election expectations fail: Polarized perceptions of election legitimacy increase with accumulating evidence of election outcomes and with polarized media.
    Grant MD; Flores A; Pedersen EJ; Sherman DK; Van Boven L
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0259473. PubMed ID: 34851979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Voter emotional responses and voting behaviour in the 2020 US presidential election.
    Lench HC; Fernandez L; Reed N; Raibley E; Levine LJ; Salsedo K
    Cogn Emot; 2024 May; ():1-14. PubMed ID: 38764190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How individuals react emotionally to others' (mis)fortunes: A social comparison framework.
    Boecker L; Loschelder DD; Topolinski S
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2022 Jul; 123(1):55-83. PubMed ID: 35025600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Lifting Me Up or Tearing You Down? The Role of Prestige and Dominance in Benign Versus Malicious Envy.
    Hasty CR; Ainsworth SE; Martinez JL; Maner JK
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2024 Jan; 50(1):133-146. PubMed ID: 36121057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. U.S. Foreign Policy on the Verge of a New Path.
    Prikhodko OV
    Her Russ Acad Sci; 2021; 91(6):667-676. PubMed ID: 35125840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Motivated reasoning: Election integrity beliefs, outcome acceptance, and polarization before, during, and after the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election.
    Vail KE; Harvell-Bowman L; Lockett M; Pyszczynski T; Gilmore G
    Motiv Emot; 2023; 47(2):177-192. PubMed ID: 36188156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Should Biden Apologize for Trump? National Remorse and the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election.
    Smith N
    Society; 2020; 57(6):698-703. PubMed ID: 33424058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Schadenfreude as social-functional dominance regulator.
    Lange J; Boecker L
    Emotion; 2019 Apr; 19(3):489-502. PubMed ID: 29771546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How an election loss leads to a social movement: Reactions to the 2016 U.S. presidential election among liberals predict later collective action and social movement identification.
    Bilali R; Godfrey EB; Freel SH
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2020 Jan; 59(1):227-247. PubMed ID: 31894871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Two signals of social rank: Prestige and dominance are associated with distinct nonverbal displays.
    Witkower Z; Tracy JL; Cheng JT; Henrich J
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2020 Jan; 118(1):89-120. PubMed ID: 31021104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. When the tables are turned: The effects of the 2016 U.S. Presidential election on in-group favoritism and out-group hostility.
    Oc B; Moore C; Bashshur MR
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(5):e0197848. PubMed ID: 29795642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Two ways to the top: evidence that dominance and prestige are distinct yet viable avenues to social rank and influence.
    Cheng JT; Tracy JL; Foulsham T; Kingstone A; Henrich J
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Jan; 104(1):103-25. PubMed ID: 23163747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. When a lack of passion intertwines with thought and action: Neutral feelings about COVID-19 are associated with U.S. presidential candidate attitudes and voting behavior.
    Park HJ; Hu D; Haynes E; Gasper K
    Emotion; 2021 Dec; 21(8):1796-1800. PubMed ID: 34843303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An ideological asymmetry in the diffusion of moralized content on social media among political leaders.
    Brady WJ; Wills JA; Burkart D; Jost JT; Van Bavel JJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Oct; 148(10):1802-1813. PubMed ID: 30589291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. #Election2020: the first public Twitter dataset on the 2020 US Presidential election.
    Chen E; Deb A; Ferrara E
    J Comput Soc Sci; 2022; 5(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 33824934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cognitive Reflection and the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election.
    Pennycook G; Rand DG
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2019 Feb; 45(2):224-239. PubMed ID: 29985107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Vote Choice, Ideology, and Social Dominance Orientation Influence Preferences for Lower Pitched Voices in Political Candidates.
    Laustsen L; Petersen MB; Klofstad CA
    Evol Psychol; 2015 Sep; 13(3):1474704915600576. PubMed ID: 37924186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.