These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38922865)

  • 1. Eligible offender samples are missing in CODIS: A statewide approach to performing a lawfully owed DNA census.
    Salinas OC
    J Forensic Sci; 2024 Sep; 69(5):1758-1770. PubMed ID: 38922865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detailing the process of identifying and the outcomes of efforts to address lawfully "owed" DNA.
    Lovell RE
    J Forensic Sci; 2022 Nov; 67(6):2321-2333. PubMed ID: 36123795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tested at Last: How DNA Evidence in Untested Rape Kits Can Identify Offenders and Serial Sexual Assaults.
    Campbell R; Feeney H; Pierce SJ; Sharma DB; Fehler-Cabral G
    J Interpers Violence; 2018 Dec; 33(24):3792-3814. PubMed ID: 27021733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How to Right a Wrong: Empirically Evaluating Whether Victim, Offender, and Assault Characteristics can Inform Rape Kit Testing Policies.
    Goodman-Williams R; Campbell R; Sharma DB; Pierce SJ; Feeney H; Fehler-Cabral G
    J Trauma Dissociation; 2019; 20(3):288-303. PubMed ID: 31072268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The case for "investigate all": Assessing the cost-effectiveness of investigating no CODIS hit cases in a sexual assault kit initiative.
    Lovell RE; Singer M; Flannery DJ; McGuire MJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2021 Jul; 66(4):1316-1328. PubMed ID: 33650102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A State Census of Unsubmitted Sexual Assault Kits: Comparing Forensic DNA Testing Outcomes by Geographic and Population Density Characteristics.
    Campbell R; Javorka M; Sharma DB; Gregory K; Opsommer M; Schelling K; Lu L
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 Nov; 65(6):1820-1827. PubMed ID: 32866311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Statistical Modeling of the Case Information From the Ohio Attorney General's Sexual Assault Kit Testing Initiative.
    Kerka JE; Heckman DJ; Albert JH; Sprague JE; Maddox LO
    J Forensic Sci; 2018 Jul; 63(4):1122-1133. PubMed ID: 29193079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Effects of Legislation Mandating DNA Testing in Sexual Assault Cases: Results in Texas.
    Davis RC; Auchter B; Wells W; Camp T; Howley S
    Violence Against Women; 2020 Apr; 26(5):417-437. PubMed ID: 30971179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The comprehensive sexual assault assessment tool.
    Burgess AW; Fawcett J
    Nurse Pract; 1996 Apr; 21(4):66, 71-6, 78 passim. PubMed ID: 8801493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Big brother and his science kit: DNA databases for 21st century crime control?
    Tracy PE; Morgan V
    J Crim Law Criminol; 2000; 90(2):635-90. PubMed ID: 16180286
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of Decision Tree and Logistic Regression Models for Utilization in Sexual Assault Kit Processing.
    Wentzlof CA; Kerka JE; Albert JH; Sprague JE; Maddox LO
    J Forensic Sci; 2019 Mar; 64(2):528-533. PubMed ID: 30290398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Combined DNA Index System (CODIS)-Based analysis of untested sexual assault evidence in Palm Beach County Florida.
    Crouse CA; Bauer L; Sessa T; Looper A; Sikorsky J; Yeatman DT
    Forensic Sci Int Synerg; 2019; 1():253-270. PubMed ID: 32411978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A cost-effectiveness analysis of the number of samples to collect and test from a sexual assault.
    Wang Z; MacMillan K; Powell M; Wein LM
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Jun; 117(24):13421-13427. PubMed ID: 32482858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The contribution of DNA databases for stored sexual crimes evidences in the central of Brazil.
    Carvalho NR; Arão GOL; Lima YAR; Godinho NMO; Mota MF; Gigonzag TCV
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 May; 46():102235. PubMed ID: 31982800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evidence Collection and Analysis for Touch Deoxyribonucleic Acid in Groping and Sexual Assault Cases.
    Valentine JL; Presler-Jur P; Mills H; Miles S
    J Forensic Nurs; 2021 Apr-Jun 01; 17(2):67-75. PubMed ID: 33843809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analyzing Approaches to the Backlog of Untested Sexual Assault Kits in the U.S.A.
    Wang C; Wein LM
    J Forensic Sci; 2018 Jul; 63(4):1110-1121. PubMed ID: 29505678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing Fourth Amendment challenges to DNA extraction statutes after Samson v. California.
    Nerko CJ
    Fordham Law Rev; 2008 Nov; 77(2):917-49. PubMed ID: 19353834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Community Protection Policies and Repeat Sexual Offenses in Florida.
    Levenson JS; Zgoba KM
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2016 Aug; 60(10):1140-58. PubMed ID: 25759428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. DNA testing in sexual assault cases: When do the benefits outweigh the costs?
    Davis RC; Wells W
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Jun; 299():44-48. PubMed ID: 30954627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparing Standard and Selective Degradation DNA Extraction Methods: Results from a Field Experiment with Sexual Assault Kits.
    Campbell R; Pierce SJ; Sharma DB; Shaw J; Feeney H; Nye J; Schelling K; Fehler-Cabral G
    J Forensic Sci; 2017 Jan; 62(1):213-222. PubMed ID: 27885653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.