These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38922874)

  • 1. The effects of cognitive bias, examiner expertise, and stimulus material on forensic evidence analysis.
    Pena MM; Stoiloff S; Sparacino M; Schreiber Compo N
    J Forensic Sci; 2024 Sep; 69(5):1740-1757. PubMed ID: 38922874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The use of contextual information in forensic toxicology: An international survey of toxicologists' experiences.
    Hamnett HJ; Jack RE
    Sci Justice; 2019 Jul; 59(4):380-389. PubMed ID: 31256809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quality of Laypersons' Assessment of Forensically Relevant Stimuli.
    Sneyd D; Schreiber Compo N; Rivard J; Pena M; Stoiloff S; Hernandez G
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 Sep; 65(5):1507-1516. PubMed ID: 32628285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contextual bias on decision-making in forensic toxicology: First survey from China.
    He N; Wang L; Hao H
    Forensic Sci Int; 2022 Apr; 333():111232. PubMed ID: 35176676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of contextual information on decision-making in footwear examination: An eye-tracking study.
    Yu Y; Luo Y; Huang L; Quan Y
    J Forensic Sci; 2021 Nov; 66(6):2218-2231. PubMed ID: 34414574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Novices cannot fill the examiners' shoes: Evidence of footwear examiners' expertise in shoe comparisons.
    Chapman R; Summersby S; Lang T; Raymond J; Ballantyne K
    Sci Justice; 2023 Sep; 63(5):598-611. PubMed ID: 37718007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy and reliability of forensic latent fingerprint decisions.
    Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Buscaglia J; Roberts MA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2011 May; 108(19):7733-8. PubMed ID: 21518906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Forensic Confirmation Bias: Do Jurors Discount Examiners Who Were Exposed to Task-Irrelevant Information?*
    Kukucka J; Hiley A; Kassin SM
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 Nov; 65(6):1978-1990. PubMed ID: 32790911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cognitive and contextual influences in determination of latent fingerprint suitability for identification judgments.
    Fraser-Mackenzie PA; Dror IE; Wertheim K
    Sci Justice; 2013 Jun; 53(2):144-53. PubMed ID: 23601721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A guide to measuring expert performance in forensic pattern matching.
    Robson SG; Searston RA; Thompson MB; Tangen JM
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Sep; 56(6):6223-6247. PubMed ID: 38485882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Discrepancies in expert decision-making in forensic fingerprint examination.
    Mustonen V; Hakkarainen K; Tuunainen J; Pohjola P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Sep; 254():215-26. PubMed ID: 26254629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biasability and reliability of expert forensic document examiners.
    Dror IE; Scherr KC; Mohammed LA; MacLean CL; Cunningham L
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Jan; 318():110610. PubMed ID: 33358191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Finding the perfect match: Fingerprint expertise facilitates statistical learning and visual comparison decision-making.
    Growns B; Mattijssen EJAT; Salerno JM; Schweitzer NJ; Cole SA; Martire KA
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2023 Jun; 29(2):386-397. PubMed ID: 35404639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of fingerprint expertise on visual short-term memory.
    Corbett BJ; Tangen JM; Searston RA; Thompson MB
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2024 Mar; 9(1):14. PubMed ID: 38502299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A global survey of the attitudes and perspectives of cognitive bias in forensic anthropology.
    Leung KN; Nakhaeizadeh S; Morgan RM
    Sci Justice; 2024 Jul; 64(4):347-359. PubMed ID: 39025560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How often do fingerprint examiners disagree in routine casework?
    O'Connor R; Chapman A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2024 Aug; 361():112139. PubMed ID: 38971142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perceptual expertise in forensic facial image comparison.
    White D; Phillips PJ; Hahn CA; Hill M; O'Toole AJ
    Proc Biol Sci; 2015 Sep; 282(1814):. PubMed ID: 26336174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Statistical feature training improves fingerprint-matching accuracy in novices and professional fingerprint examiners.
    Growns B; Towler A; Dunn JD; Salerno JM; Schweitzer NJ; Dror IE
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2022 Jul; 7(1):60. PubMed ID: 35841470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A biased opinion: Demonstration of cognitive bias on a fingerprint matching task through knowledge of DNA test results.
    Stevenage SV; Bennett A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Jul; 276():93-106. PubMed ID: 28514701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Human matching performance of genuine crime scene latent fingerprints.
    Thompson MB; Tangen JM; McCarthy DJ
    Law Hum Behav; 2014 Feb; 38(1):84-93. PubMed ID: 23876092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.