These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38923520)

  • 21. Subgroup analyses in randomised controlled trials: quantifying the risks of false-positives and false-negatives.
    Brookes ST; Whitley E; Peters TJ; Mulheran PA; Egger M; Davey Smith G
    Health Technol Assess; 2001; 5(33):1-56. PubMed ID: 11701102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Advice on comparing two independent samples of circular data in biology.
    Landler L; Ruxton GD; Malkemper EP
    Sci Rep; 2021 Oct; 11(1):20337. PubMed ID: 34645855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Tests for density dependence revisited.
    Fox DR; Ridsdill-Smith J
    Oecologia; 1995 Sep; 103(4):435-443. PubMed ID: 28306991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. To test or not to test: Preliminary assessment of normality when comparing two independent samples.
    Rochon J; Gondan M; Kieser M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2012 Jun; 12():81. PubMed ID: 22712852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Statistical power as a function of Cronbach alpha of instrument questionnaire items.
    Heo M; Kim N; Faith MS
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Oct; 15():86. PubMed ID: 26467219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Violating the normality assumption may be the lesser of two evils.
    Knief U; Forstmeier W
    Behav Res Methods; 2021 Dec; 53(6):2576-2590. PubMed ID: 33963496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effect of normality and outliers on bivariate correlation coefficients in psychology: A Monte Carlo simulation.
    Ventura-León J; Peña-Calero BN; Burga-León A
    J Gen Psychol; 2023; 150(4):405-422. PubMed ID: 35792742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. GTest: a software tool for graphical assessment of empirical distributions' Gaussianity.
    Barca E; Bruno E; Bruno DE; Passarella G
    Environ Monit Assess; 2016 Mar; 188(3):138. PubMed ID: 26846288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Small class sizes for improving student achievement in primary and secondary schools: a systematic review.
    Filges T; Sonne-Schmidt CS; Nielsen BCV
    Campbell Syst Rev; 2018; 14(1):1-107. PubMed ID: 37131395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A Meta-Meta-Analysis: Empirical Review of Statistical Power, Type I Error Rates, Effect Sizes, and Model Selection of Meta-Analyses Published in Psychology.
    Cafri G; Kromrey JD; Brannick MT
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2010 Mar; 45(2):239-70. PubMed ID: 26760285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A simple statistic for comparing moderation of slopes and correlations.
    Smithson M
    Front Psychol; 2012; 3():231. PubMed ID: 22866042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Estimating Latent Variable Interactions With Non-Normal Observed Data: A Comparison of Four Approaches.
    Cham H; West SG; Ma Y; Aiken LS
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2012 Nov; 47(6):840-876. PubMed ID: 23457417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Robustness and power of analysis of covariance applied to data distorted from normality by floor effects: homogeneous regression slopes.
    Sullivan LM; D'Agostino RB
    Stat Med; 1996 Mar; 15(5):477-96. PubMed ID: 8668873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Taxon sampling, correlated evolution, and independent contrasts.
    Ackerly DD
    Evolution; 2000 Oct; 54(5):1480-92. PubMed ID: 11108577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Erratum: Eyestalk Ablation to Increase Ovarian Maturation in Mud Crabs.
    J Vis Exp; 2023 May; (195):. PubMed ID: 37235796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Using parametric multipoint lods and mods for linkage analysis requires a shift in statistical thinking.
    Hodge SE; Baskurt Z; Strug LJ
    Hum Hered; 2011; 72(4):264-75. PubMed ID: 22189469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares.
    Li CH
    Behav Res Methods; 2016 Sep; 48(3):936-49. PubMed ID: 26174714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A simple powerful bivariate test for two sample location problems in experimental and observational studies.
    Tabesh H; Ayatollahi SM; Towhidi M
    Theor Biol Med Model; 2010 May; 7():13. PubMed ID: 20459659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A Monte Carlo evaluation of three statistical methods used in path analysis.
    McGue M; Wette R; Rao DC
    Genet Epidemiol; 1987; 4(2):129-55. PubMed ID: 3582958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A simulation study comparing the power of nine tests of the treatment effect in randomized controlled trials with a time-to-event outcome.
    Royston P; B Parmar MK
    Trials; 2020 Apr; 21(1):315. PubMed ID: 32252820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.