These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

59 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3892477)

  • 1. [Exposure dose of digital subtraction angiography].
    Yodono H; Yokoyama Y; Katto K; Kamata K; Kudo I; Shinozaki T
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1985 Mar; 45(3):525-30. PubMed ID: 3892477
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Exposure dose of digital subtraction angiography--patient's dose and angiographer's dose].
    Nitatori T; Nishizawa K; Hachiya J; Furuya Y; Maruyama T
    Rinsho Hoshasen; 1986 Oct; 31(10):1159-62. PubMed ID: 3540379
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Radiation exposure of the examiner during digital subtraction angiography in the continuous-mode operation].
    Langer M; Golde G; Fiegler W; Felix R
    Rofo; 1984 Nov; 141(5):544-5. PubMed ID: 6438720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Measurements of radiation exposure of patients during indirect transvenous digital subtraction angiography--comparison of pulse-mode and continuous-mode operation].
    Neufang KF; Schmitt B; Ewen K; Frössler H
    Rontgenpraxis; 1985 Jun; 38(6):206-8. PubMed ID: 4023847
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Radiation exposure of the patient in conventional and digital intravenous angiography.
    Passariello R; Pavone P; Simonetti G; Rossi P; Pesce B; Tempesta P; Zarola L
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1983 Nov; 26(7):548-50. PubMed ID: 6364933
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Image signals of digital subtraction angiography in a videodensitometric method].
    Katsuragawa S; Ishikawa I; Takahashi T; Yanagisawa T
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1986 Jan; 46(1):75-7. PubMed ID: 3517807
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Radiation exposure during digital subtraction angiography (DSA) of the kidney and aortic arch].
    Neufang KF; Ewen K
    Rofo; 1983 Sep; 139(3):300-3. PubMed ID: 6411551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Construction of a digital subtraction angiography vessel phantom and experimental study on resolution].
    Takahashi M; Tsuchigame T
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1984 Mar; 44(3):494-502. PubMed ID: 6379598
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Digital peripheral angiography with pace shifting and subtraction. Comparison with the standard procedure].
    Hilbertz T; Fink U; Beck R; Berger H; Eberwein U
    Rofo; 1991 Sep; 155(3):228-34. PubMed ID: 1912540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Experimental and clinical studies on intravenous digital subtraction angiography. Application for thoracic and abdominal diseases].
    Tamura S
    Fukuoka Igaku Zasshi; 1984 Dec; 75(12):661-82. PubMed ID: 6397413
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Equipment and methodologic parameters of radiation exposure in digital subtraction angiography].
    Neufang KF; Ewen K
    Rontgenblatter; 1989 Apr; 42(4):180-6. PubMed ID: 2652271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Resolving power of digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Measurements of opacification with different blood vessel calibers and constrictions in relation to contrast media concentration].
    Schultz E; Fischer P
    Rofo; 1983 Sep; 139(3):296-9. PubMed ID: 6411550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Reducing radiation exposure in angiography].
    Imhof K
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1995 Nov; 5(6):385-8. PubMed ID: 8580140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Somatic radiation risk during heart examinations using digital angiography and ECG-triggered computed tomography].
    Ewen K; Lackner K; Fischer P
    Rofo; 1983 Oct; 139(4):440-3. PubMed ID: 6413329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Radiation exposure of personnel during digital subtraction angiography.
    Britton CA; Wholey MH
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 1988 Apr; 11(2):108-10. PubMed ID: 3134132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Imaging capability of an experimental digital subtraction angiography unit.
    MacIntyre WJ; Pavlicek W; Gallagher JH; Meaney TF; Buonocore E; Weinstein MA
    Radiology; 1981 May; 139(2):307-13. PubMed ID: 7012923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantitative digital subtraction angiography: two scanning techniques for correction of scattered radiation and veiling glare. Work in progress.
    Shaw CG; Plewes DB
    Radiology; 1985 Oct; 157(1):247-53. PubMed ID: 3898220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Radiation exposure during angiography of the arteries supplying the brain. A comparison between intra-arterial DSA and the conventional technique].
    Gilgenbach R; Schröder U; Heuser L
    Rofo; 1990 Oct; 153(4):418-22. PubMed ID: 2171089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Digital subtraction angiography: fundamental noise characteristics.
    Balter S; Ergun D; Tscholl E; Buchmann F; Verhoeven L
    Radiology; 1984 Jul; 152(1):195-8. PubMed ID: 6374758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Patient doses during digital subtraction angiography of the carotid arteries: comparison with conventional angiography.
    Pavlicek W; Weinstein MA; Modic MT; Buonocore E; Duchesneau PM
    Radiology; 1982 Dec; 145(3):683-5. PubMed ID: 6755546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.