These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38926563)

  • 21. Uncertainty for UK science ahead of giant spending review.
    Cressey D; Gibney E
    Nature; 2015 Nov; 527(7577):144-5. PubMed ID: 26560276
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. How Trump's science cuts could hurt states that voted for him.
    Witze A
    Nature; 2017 May; 545(7654):273-274. PubMed ID: 28516935
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. US midterm elections offer little hope for science.
    Morello L
    Nature; 2014 Oct; 514(7523):412-3. PubMed ID: 25341766
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Nigeria ready for huge science spend.
    Giles J
    Nature; 2006 Jul; 442(7101):334. PubMed ID: 16871173
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Science gets little love in Trump spending plan.
    Science News Staff
    Science; 2017 May; 356(6340):795. PubMed ID: 28546167
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. UK election: three research priorities for the next government.
    Nature; 2024 Jul; 631(8019):7. PubMed ID: 38956333
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Brazil's presidential election could savage its science.
    Tollefson J
    Nature; 2018 Oct; 562(7726):171-172. PubMed ID: 30301988
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. What the UK election means for science.
    Gibney E
    Nature; 2015 May; 521(7551):134. PubMed ID: 25971484
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Scientists' turn to win votes.
    Nature; 2010 May; 465(7295):135. PubMed ID: 20463693
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Good advice.
    Nature; 2012 Jul; 487(7405):5-6. PubMed ID: 22763508
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Chávez squeezes scientific freedom.
    Petherick A
    Nature; 2011 Jan; 469(7328):11. PubMed ID: 21209634
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Serbia is rethinking science - but the reforms could cost hundreds of jobs.
    Jarić Dauenhauer N; Tatalović M
    Nature; 2019 Jan; 565(7739):275-276. PubMed ID: 30647422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. High stakes for US science.
    Tollefson J; Ledford H
    Nature; 2012 Oct; 490(7421):453-5. PubMed ID: 23099376
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Nature supports the March for Science.
    Nature; 2017 Apr; 544(7649):137. PubMed ID: 28406216
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Recession Watch: Learn to convince politicians.
    Taylor I
    Nature; 2009 Feb; 457(7232):958-9. PubMed ID: 19225499
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Moderate flies flag for science on Capitol Hill.
    Brumfiel G
    Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6930):365. PubMed ID: 12660746
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Intolerance and funding concern Indian scientists ahead of election.
    Padma TV
    Nature; 2019 May; 569(7756):317-318. PubMed ID: 31089221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. UK's new science minister on budget battles, Brexit and AI leadership.
    Gibney E
    Nature; 2024 Aug; 632(8027):962. PubMed ID: 39160397
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. America's new leadership.
    Goldston D
    Nature; 2008 Nov; 456(7218):16. PubMed ID: 18987708
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. UK scientists hope for softened Brexit after shock election result.
    Gibney E
    Nature; 2017 Jun; 546(7658):. PubMed ID: 28617475
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.