These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38927704)

  • 1. An Assessment of the Performance Limitations of the Integrated Quantifiler
    Smith C; Seashols-Williams SJ; Boone EL; Dawson Green T
    Genes (Basel); 2024 Jun; 15(6):. PubMed ID: 38927704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A quantifiler™ trio-based HRM screening assay for the accurate prediction of single source versus mixed biological samples.
    Torres D; Smith C; Williams AL; Cox JO; Seashols-Williams SJ; Boone EL; Green TD
    Int J Legal Med; 2023 Nov; 137(6):1639-1651. PubMed ID: 37553510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Developmental validation of the Quantifiler(®) HP and Trio Kits for human DNA quantification in forensic samples.
    Holt A; Wootton SC; Mulero JJ; Brzoska PM; Langit E; Green RL
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Mar; 21():145-57. PubMed ID: 26774100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Direct qPCR quantification using the Quantifiler(®) Trio DNA quantification kit.
    Liu JY
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Nov; 13():10-9. PubMed ID: 25047573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A performance study on three qPCR quantification kits and their compatibilities with the 6-dye DNA profiling systems.
    Lin SW; Li C; Ip SCY
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Mar; 33():72-83. PubMed ID: 29202296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantitation of DNA Using the Applied Biosystems Quantifiler
    Knight KL; Mauriello A; Williams G
    Methods Mol Biol; 2023; 2685():175-188. PubMed ID: 37439982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Looking into the Quantification of Forensic Samples with Real-Time PCR.
    Ricci U; Ciappi D; Carboni I; Centrone C; Giotti I; Petti M; Alice B; Pelo E
    Genes (Basel); 2024 Jun; 15(6):. PubMed ID: 38927695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantifiler® Trio Kit and forensic samples management: a matter of degradation.
    Vernarecci S; Ottaviani E; Agostino A; Mei E; Calandro L; Montagna P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 May; 16():77-85. PubMed ID: 25544252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improving the efficiency of Y-chromosome detection and the quality of STR typing in forensic casework with an in-house made qPCR and HRM system based on SYTO™ 9 chemistry.
    Ginart S; Garrigos Calivares L; Caputo M; Corach D; Sala A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2024 Jan; 354():111893. PubMed ID: 38064775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Usefulness of qPCR Data for Sample Pre-Assessment and Interpretation of Genetic Typing Results.
    Onofri M; Severini S; Tommolini F; Lancia M; Gambelunghe C; Carlini L; Carnevali E
    Genes (Basel); 2024 Jun; 15(6):. PubMed ID: 38927680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Developmental validation of the quantifiler real-time PCR kits for the quantification of human nuclear DNA samples.
    Green RL; Roinestad IC; Boland C; Hennessy LK
    J Forensic Sci; 2005 Jul; 50(4):809-25. PubMed ID: 16078482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantitative PCR overestimation of DNA in samples contaminated with tin.
    Bonsu DNO; Higgins D; Simon C; Goodwin CS; Henry JM; Austin JJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2023 Jul; 68(4):1302-1309. PubMed ID: 37326229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing DNA Degradation through Differential Amplification Efficiency of Total Human and Human Male DNA in a Forensic qPCR Assay.
    Chierto E; Aneli S; Nocco N; Riem A; Onofri M; Carnevali E; Robino C
    Genes (Basel); 2024 May; 15(5):. PubMed ID: 38790251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Deconvoluting multi-person biological mixtures and accurate characterization and identification of separated contributors using non-targeted single-cell DNA sequencing.
    Kulhankova L; Bindels E; Kayser M; Mulugeta E
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2024 Jul; 71():103030. PubMed ID: 38513339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validation of Reduced Reagent Volumes in the Implementation of the Quantifiler
    Cho Y; Kim HS; Kim MH; Park M; Kwon H; Lee YH; Lee DS
    J Forensic Sci; 2018 Mar; 63(2):517-525. PubMed ID: 28631292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Y-STR genetic screening by high-resolution melting analysis.
    Deng JQ; Liu BQ; Wang Y; Liu W; Cai JF; Long R; Li WH
    Genet Mol Res; 2016 Feb; 15(1):. PubMed ID: 26909950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Casework direct kit as an alternative extraction method to enhance touch DNA samples analysis.
    Francisco DO; Lopez LF; Gonçalves FT; Fridman C
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jul; 47():102307. PubMed ID: 32447230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of four commercial quantitative real-time PCR kits with inhibited and degraded samples.
    Holmes AS; Houston R; Elwick K; Gangitano D; Hughes-Stamm S
    Int J Legal Med; 2018 May; 132(3):691-701. PubMed ID: 29177703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validation of a DNA mixture statistics tool incorporating allelic drop-out and drop-in.
    Mitchell AA; Tamariz J; O'Connell K; Ducasse N; Budimlija Z; Prinz M; Caragine T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):749-61. PubMed ID: 22999739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Direct qPCR quantification of unprocessed forensic casework samples.
    Liu JY
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Jul; 11():96-104. PubMed ID: 24705062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.