These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3892806)

  • 1. Estimation of varying ultrasonic attenuation.
    Claesson I; Salomonsson G
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1985; 11(1):131-45. PubMed ID: 3892806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Specular reflector noise: effect and correction for in vivo attenuation estimation.
    Laugier P; Berger G; Fink M; Perrin J
    Ultrason Imaging; 1985 Oct; 7(4):277-92. PubMed ID: 3914769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Parameter estimation for nonlinear frequency dependent attenuation in soft tissue.
    He P; McGoron A
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1989; 15(8):757-63. PubMed ID: 2694562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Partially coherent transducers: the random phase transducer approach.
    Mallart R; Fink M; Laugier P; Abouelkaram S
    Ultrason Imaging; 1990 Jul; 12(3):205-28. PubMed ID: 2195741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ultrasonic signal processing for in vivo attenuation measurement: short time Fourier analysis.
    Fink M; Hottier F; Cardoso JF
    Ultrason Imaging; 1983 Apr; 5(2):117-35. PubMed ID: 6683891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimation of ultrasound attenuation and dispersion using short time Fourier transform.
    Zhao B; Basir OA; Mittal GS
    Ultrasonics; 2005 Mar; 43(5):375-81. PubMed ID: 15737388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On estimating the number density of random scatterers from backscattered acoustic signals.
    Sleefe GE; Lele PP
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1988; 14(8):709-27. PubMed ID: 3062865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A consistent tissue attenuation coefficient estimator using bubble harmonic echoes.
    Tsao SK; Tsao J
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2010 Dec; 57(12):2654-61. PubMed ID: 21156361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Modeling acoustic attenuation of soft tissue with a minimum-phase filter.
    Kuc R
    Ultrason Imaging; 1984 Jan; 6(1):24-36. PubMed ID: 6548058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimating ultrasonic parameters of biological tissue by adaptive filtering technique.
    Shiina T; Ikeda K; Saito M
    Front Med Biol Eng; 1988; 1(1):29-43. PubMed ID: 3153657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimate of attenuation coefficient for ultrasonic tissue characterization using time-varying state-space model.
    Shih LY; Barnes CW; Ferrari LA
    Ultrason Imaging; 1988 Apr; 10(2):90-109. PubMed ID: 3057715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ultrasound attenuation estimation in soft tissue using the entropy difference of pulsed echoes between two adjacent envelope segments.
    Jang HS; Song TK; Park SB
    Ultrason Imaging; 1988 Oct; 10(4):248-64. PubMed ID: 3074549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hybrid spectral domain method for attenuation slope estimation.
    Kim H; Varghese T
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Nov; 34(11):1808-19. PubMed ID: 18621468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Lower Bound on Estimation Variance of the Ultrasonic Attenuation Coefficient Using the Spectral-Difference Reference-phantom Method.
    Samimi K; Varghese T
    Ultrason Imaging; 2017 May; 39(3):151-171. PubMed ID: 28425388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Model-based estimation of thin multi-layered media using ultrasonic measurements.
    Hägglund F; Martinsson J; Carlson JE
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2009 Aug; 56(8):1689-702. PubMed ID: 19686984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimation of some transducer parameters in a broadband piezoelectric transmitter by using an artificial intelligence technique.
    Ruíz A; Ramos A; San Emeterio JL
    Ultrasonics; 2004 Apr; 42(1-9):459-63. PubMed ID: 15047329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Digital Signal Processing Methods for Ultrasonic Echoes.
    Sinding K; Drapaca C; Tittmann B
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2016 Aug; 63(8):1172-1176. PubMed ID: 28113550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Investigation of a model for estimating the attenuation of ultrasonic signals.
    Salomonsson G; Claesson I; Holmer NG
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 1984 Nov; 22(6):543-51. PubMed ID: 6390011
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attenuation estimation by repeatedly solving the forward scattering problem.
    Ilyina N; Hermans J; Verboven E; Van Den Abeele K; D'Agostino E; D'hooge J
    Ultrasonics; 2018 Mar; 84():201-209. PubMed ID: 29156300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A method to identify acoustic reverberation in multilayered homogeneous media.
    Duarte MA; Machado JC; Pereira WC
    Ultrasonics; 2004 Mar; 41(9):683-98. PubMed ID: 14996528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.