These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3892806)

  • 41. In vivo ultrasonic attenuation in cetacean soft tissues.
    Gray MD; Rogers PH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Feb; 141(2):EL83. PubMed ID: 28253670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Characterization of splenic structure in Hodgkin disease by using narrow-band filtration of backscattered ultrasound.
    Friedman PA; Sommer FG; Chen HS; Rachlin DJ; Hoppe R
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1989 Jun; 152(6):1197-203. PubMed ID: 2655388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Comparative study of a 15-MHz focused ultrasonic transducer and a 15-MHz unfocused ultrasonic transducer for clinical in-vivo skin-thickness measurements in human subjects.
    Dick RE; Faddis TN; Barr BG
    Biomed Instrum Technol; 1992; 26(1):48-51. PubMed ID: 1737184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Spectral ratio method to estimate broadband ultrasound attenuation of cortical bones in vitro using multiple reflections.
    Zheng R; Le LH; Sacchi MD; Ta D; Lou E
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Oct; 52(19):5855-69. PubMed ID: 17881804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Analysis of Coherent and Diffuse Scattering Using a Reference Phantom.
    Rosado-Mendez IM; Drehfal LC; Zagzebski JA; Hall TJ
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2016 Sep; 63(9):1306-20. PubMed ID: 27046872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Statistics of the envelope of ultrasonic backscatter from human trabecular bone.
    Litniewski J; Cieslik L; Wojcik J; Nowicki A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):2224-32. PubMed ID: 21973377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Ultrasonic assessment of human and bovine trabecular bone: a comparison study.
    Alves JM; Xu W; Lin D; Siffert RS; Ryaby JT; Kaufman JJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1996 Mar; 43(3):249-58. PubMed ID: 8682537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Simulation of ultrasound two-dimensional array transducers using a frequency domain model.
    Rao M; Varghese T; Zagzebski JA
    Med Phys; 2008 Jul; 35(7):3162-9. PubMed ID: 18697541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Simultaneous delivery of electron beam therapy and ultrasound hyperthermia using scanning reflectors: a feasibility study.
    Moros EG; Straube WL; Klein EE; Yousaf M; Myerson RJ
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1995 Feb; 31(4):893-904. PubMed ID: 7860403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Estimation of ultrasound attenuation from broadband echo-signals using bandpass filtering.
    Kim H; Zagzebski JA; Varghese T
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2008 May; 55(5):1153-9. PubMed ID: 18519224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Ultimate limits in ultrasonic imaging resolution.
    Harris RA; Follett DH; Halliwell M; Wells PN
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1991; 17(6):547-58. PubMed ID: 1962357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Ultrasonic attenuation estimation in-vivo using the difference ratio correction method.
    Zhou K; Zhang D; Lin C; Zhu S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Nov; 92(5):2532-8. PubMed ID: 1479118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. An artificial bee colony optimization based matching pursuit approach for ultrasonic echo estimation.
    Qi AL; Zhang GM; Dong M; Ma HW; Harvey DM
    Ultrasonics; 2018 Aug; 88():1-8. PubMed ID: 29525226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Maximum a posteriori deconvolution of ultrasonic signals using multiple transducers.
    Olofsson T; Stepinski T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Jun; 107(6):3276-88. PubMed ID: 10875373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Transducer characterization from pressure amplitude distribution measurements using a Kalman filter as parameter estimation algorithm.
    Linssen FM; Hoeks AP
    Ultrason Imaging; 1990 Oct; 12(4):309-23. PubMed ID: 2256230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Optimal focusing by spatio-temporal inverse filter. I. Basic principles.
    Tanter M; Aubry JF; Gerber J; Thomas JL; Fink M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Jul; 110(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 11508962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Golay improvement of the robustness of mean scatterer spacing measurement with ultrasonic backscattering.
    Pan W; Shen Y; Liu T; Wang Y
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2015; 26 Suppl 1():S455-65. PubMed ID: 26406037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A novel noncontact ultrasound indentation system for measurement of tissue material properties using water jet compression.
    Lu MH; Zheng YP; Huang QH
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 Jun; 31(6):817-26. PubMed ID: 15936497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. An ultrasonic transducer transient compensator design based on a simplified Variable Structure Control algorithm.
    Ma S; Wilkinson AJ; Paulson KS
    Ultrasonics; 2014 Feb; 54(2):502-15. PubMed ID: 23993746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Segmented motion compensation for complementary coded ultrasonic imaging.
    Cannon C; Hannah J; McLaughlin S
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2010 May; 57(5):1039-50. PubMed ID: 20442015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.