155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38929786)
1. Digital versus Manual Tracing in Cephalometric Analysis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Narkhede S; Rao P; Sawant V; Sachdev SS; Arora S; Pawar AM; Reda R; Testarelli L
J Pers Med; 2024 May; 14(6):. PubMed ID: 38929786
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for Automated Cephalometric Landmark Identification: A Meta-Analysis Previewed by a Systematic Review.
Rauniyar S; Jena S; Sahoo N; Mohanty P; Dash BP
Cureus; 2023 Jun; 15(6):e40934. PubMed ID: 37496553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Can artificial intelligence-driven cephalometric analysis replace manual tracing? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Hendrickx J; Gracea RS; Vanheers M; Winderickx N; Preda F; Shujaat S; Jacobs R
Eur J Orthod; 2024 Aug; 46(4):. PubMed ID: 38895901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.
Osborne SR; Alston LV; Bolton KA; Whelan J; Reeve E; Wong Shee A; Browne J; Walker T; Versace VL; Allender S; Nichols M; Backholer K; Goodwin N; Lewis S; Dalton H; Prael G; Curtin M; Brooks R; Verdon S; Crockett J; Hodgins G; Walsh S; Lyle DM; Thompson SC; Browne LJ; Knight S; Pit SW; Jones M; Gillam MH; Leach MJ; Gonzalez-Chica DA; Muyambi K; Eshetie T; Tran K; May E; Lieschke G; Parker V; Smith A; Hayes C; Dunlop AJ; Rajappa H; White R; Oakley P; Holliday S
Med J Aust; 2020 Dec; 213 Suppl 11():S3-S32.e1. PubMed ID: 33314144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Artificial Intelligence for Detecting Cephalometric Landmarks: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
de Queiroz Tavares Borges Mesquita G; Vieira WA; Vidigal MTC; Travençolo BAN; Beaini TL; Spin-Neto R; Paranhos LR; de Brito Júnior RB
J Digit Imaging; 2023 Jun; 36(3):1158-1179. PubMed ID: 36604364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cancer screening with digital mammography for women at average risk for breast cancer, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for women at high risk: an evidence-based analysis.
Medical Advisory Secretariat
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(3):1-55. PubMed ID: 23074406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Digital contact tracing technologies in epidemics: a rapid review.
Anglemyer A; Moore TH; Parker L; Chambers T; Grady A; Chiu K; Parry M; Wilczynska M; Flemyng E; Bero L
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 Aug; 8(8):CD013699. PubMed ID: 33502000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Development, Application, and Performance of Artificial Intelligence in Cephalometric Landmark Identification and Diagnosis: A Systematic Review.
Junaid N; Khan N; Ahmed N; Abbasi MS; Das G; Maqsood A; Ahmed AR; Marya A; Alam MK; Heboyan A
Healthcare (Basel); 2022 Dec; 10(12):. PubMed ID: 36553978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing the Reliability of Digitalized Cephalometric Analysis in Comparison with Manual Cephalometric Analysis.
Farooq MU; Khan MA; Imran S; Sameera A; Qureshi A; Ahmed SA; Kumar S; Rahman MA
J Clin Diagn Res; 2016 Oct; 10(10):ZC20-ZC23. PubMed ID: 27891451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cephalometric analysis performance discrepancy between orthodontists and an artificial intelligence model using lateral cephalometric radiographs.
Guinot-Barona C; Alonso Pérez-Barquero J; Galán López L; Barmak AB; Att W; Kois JC; Revilla-León M
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2024 Apr; 36(4):555-565. PubMed ID: 37882509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparative evaluation of concordance and speed between smartphone app-based and artificial intelligence web-based cephalometric tracing software with the manual tracing method: A cross-sectional study.
Gupta S; Shetty S; Natarajan S; Nambiar S; Mv A; Agarwal S
J Clin Exp Dent; 2024 Jan; 16(1):e11-e17. PubMed ID: 38314342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of fully automated cephalometric measurements obtained from web-based artificial intelligence driven platform.
Mahto RK; Kafle D; Giri A; Luintel S; Karki A
BMC Oral Health; 2022 Apr; 22(1):132. PubMed ID: 35440037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison between cephalometric measurements using digital manual and web-based artificial intelligence cephalometric tracing software.
Çoban G; Öztürk T; Hashimli N; Yağci A
Dental Press J Orthod; 2022; 27(4):e222112. PubMed ID: 35976288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of deep learning and convolutional neural network algorithms accuracy for detecting and predicting anatomical landmarks on 2D lateral cephalometric images: A systematic review and
Londono J; Ghasemi S; Hussain Shah A; Fahimipour A; Ghadimi N; Hashemi S; Khurshid Z; Dashti M
Saudi Dent J; 2023 Jul; 35(5):487-497. PubMed ID: 37520606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of facemasks versus intraoral appliances in treating maxillary deficiency in growing patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Farhadian N; Soheilifar S; Abolvardi M; Miresmailei A; Mohammadi Y
Dent Med Probl; 2019; 56(4):401-410. PubMed ID: 31895504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reproducibility of linear and angular cephalometric measurements obtained by an artificial-intelligence assisted software (WebCeph) in comparison with digital software (AutoCEPH) and manual tracing method.
Prince STT; Srinivasan D; Duraisamy S; Kannan R; Rajaram K
Dental Press J Orthod; 2023; 28(1):e2321214. PubMed ID: 37018830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Digital and manual cephalometric analysis.
Thurzo A; Javorka V; Stanko P; Lysy J; Suchancova B; Lehotska V; Valkovic L; Makovnik M
Bratisl Lek Listy; 2010; 111(2):97-100. PubMed ID: 20429323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of automated 3D cephalometric landmarks by deep learning algorithms: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Serafin M; Baldini B; Cabitza F; Carrafiello G; Baselli G; Del Fabbro M; Sforza C; Caprioglio A; Tartaglia GM
Radiol Med; 2023 May; 128(5):544-555. PubMed ID: 37093337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validity of 2D lateral cephalometry in orthodontics: a systematic review.
Durão AR; Pittayapat P; Rockenbach MI; Olszewski R; Ng S; Ferreira AP; Jacobs R
Prog Orthod; 2013 Sep; 14(1):31. PubMed ID: 24325757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
