120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38932064)
1. The Effect of Build Angle and Artificial Aging on the Accuracy of SLA- and DLP-Printed Occlusal Devices.
Saadat Sarmadi B; Schmidt F; Beuer F; Metin DS; Simeon P; Nicic R; Unkovskiy A
Polymers (Basel); 2024 Jun; 16(12):. PubMed ID: 38932064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Wear resistance and flexural properties of low force SLA- and DLP-printed splint materials in different printing orientations: An in vitro study.
Simeon P; Unkovskiy A; Saadat Sarmadi B; Nicic R; Koch PJ; Beuer F; Schmidt F
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2024 Apr; 152():106458. PubMed ID: 38364445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effects of manufacturing technologies on the surface accuracy of CAD-CAM occlusal splints.
Orgev A; Levon JA; Chu TG; Morton D; Lin WS
J Prosthodont; 2023 Oct; 32(8):697-705. PubMed ID: 36227731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of build orientation on the trueness of occlusal splints fabricated by three-dimensional printing.
Cameron AB; Tong K; Tadakamadla S; Evans JL; Abuzar M
J Oral Sci; 2023 Oct; 65(4):261-264. PubMed ID: 37690838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Error analysis of stages involved in CBCT-guided implant placement with surgical guides when different printing technologies are used.
Yeager B; Çakmak G; Zheng F; Johnston WM; Yilmaz B
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 36690552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of additive manufacturing method and build angle on the accuracy of 3D-printed palatal plates.
Dai J; Li P; Spintzyk S; Liu C; Xu S
J Dent; 2023 May; 132():104449. PubMed ID: 36773740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy and its impact on fit of injection molded, milled and additively manufactured occlusal splints.
Wesemann C; Spies BC; Schaefer D; Adali U; Beuer F; Pieralli S
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Feb; 114():104179. PubMed ID: 33189599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stereolithography vs. Direct Light Processing for Rapid Manufacturing of Complete Denture Bases: An In Vitro Accuracy Analysis.
Unkovskiy A; Schmidt F; Beuer F; Li P; Spintzyk S; Kraemer Fernandez P
J Clin Med; 2021 Mar; 10(5):. PubMed ID: 33806627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Precision and trueness of dental models manufactured with different 3-dimensional printing techniques.
Kim SY; Shin YS; Jung HD; Hwang CJ; Baik HS; Cha JY
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Jan; 153(1):144-153. PubMed ID: 29287640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Trueness and fitting accuracy of maxillary 3D printed complete dentures.
Yoshidome K; Torii M; Kawamura N; Shimpo H; Ohkubo C
J Prosthodont Res; 2021 Oct; 65(4):559-564. PubMed ID: 33980786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of internal design on the accuracy of 3-dimensionally printed casts fabricated by stereolithography and digital light processing technology.
Chen Y; Li H; Zhai Z; Nakano T; Ishigaki S
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Sep; 130(3):381.e1-381.e7. PubMed ID: 37482533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of CAD/CAM-fabricated bite splints: milling vs 3D printing.
Marcel R; Reinhard H; Andreas K
Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Dec; 24(12):4607-4615. PubMed ID: 32436163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effects of additive manufacturing technologies and finish line designs on the trueness and dimensional stability of 3D-printed dies.
Lai YC; Yang CC; Levon JA; Chu TG; Morton D; Lin WS
J Prosthodont; 2023 Jul; 32(6):519-526. PubMed ID: 35962924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Do hydrothermal aging and microwave sterilization affect the trueness of milled, additive manufactured and injection molded denture bases?
Wemken G; Spies BC; Pieralli S; Adali U; Beuer F; Wesemann C
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Nov; 111():103975. PubMed ID: 32781402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of additive manufacturing method and build angle on surface characteristics and Candida albicans adhesion to 3D printed denture base polymers.
Li P; Fernandez PK; Spintzyk S; Schmidt F; Beuer F; Unkovskiy A
J Dent; 2022 Jan; 116():103889. PubMed ID: 34800586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of commercial 3D printers for the fabrication of surgical guides in dental implantology.
Rouzé l'Alzit F; Cade R; Naveau A; Babilotte J; Meglioli M; Catros S
J Dent; 2022 Feb; 117():103909. PubMed ID: 34852291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of zirconia crowns manufactured by stereolithography with an occlusal full-supporting structure: An in vitro study.
Li R; Xu T; Wang Y; Sun Y
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Dec; 130(6):902-907. PubMed ID: 35183363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of build orientation in accuracy, flexural modulus, flexural strength, and microhardness of 3D-Printed resins for provisional restorations.
de Castro EF; Nima G; Rueggeberg FA; Giannini M
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2022 Dec; 136():105479. PubMed ID: 36279743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The occlusal precision of milled versus printed provisional crowns.
Giannetti L; Apponi R; Mordini L; Presti S; Breschi L; Mintrone F
J Dent; 2022 Feb; 117():103924. PubMed ID: 34910962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of build orientation and layer thickness on manufacturing accuracy, printing time, and material consumption of 3D printed complete denture bases.
Song S; Zhang J; Liu M; Li F; Bai S
J Dent; 2023 Mar; 130():104435. PubMed ID: 36693587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
