118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38933935)
1. Evaluating lecturer performance in Vietnam: An application of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods.
Do QH; Tran VT; Tran TT
Heliyon; 2024 Jun; 10(11):e30772. PubMed ID: 38933935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An Integrated Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS Approach to Assess Sustainable Urban Development in an Emerging Economy.
Dang VT; Wang J; Van-Thac Dang W
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Aug; 16(16):. PubMed ID: 31412685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Streamlining apartment provider evaluation: A spherical fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model.
Nguyen PH; Tran TH; Thi Nguyen LA; Pham HA; Thi Pham MA
Heliyon; 2023 Dec; 9(12):e22353. PubMed ID: 38144291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bottled water quality ranking via the multiple-criteria decision-making process: a case study of two-stage fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS.
Nabizadeh R; Yousefzadeh S; Yaghmaeian K; Alimohammadi M; Mokhtari Z
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Mar; 29(14):20437-20448. PubMed ID: 34735703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparative analysis of three multi-criteria decision-making methods for land suitability assessment.
Rashidi F; Sharifian S
Environ Monit Assess; 2022 Aug; 194(9):657. PubMed ID: 35941257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Transshipment site selection using the AHP and TOPSIS approaches under fuzzy environment.
Onüt S; Soner S
Waste Manag; 2008; 28(9):1552-9. PubMed ID: 17768038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Aircraft selection by applying AHP and TOPSIS in interval type-2 fuzzy sets.
Kiracı K; Akan E
J Air Transp Manag; 2020 Oct; 89():101924. PubMed ID: 32989347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Integration of Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS Methods for Wire Electric Discharge Machining of Titanium (Ti6Al4V) Alloy Using RSM.
Fuse K; Dalsaniya A; Modi D; Vora J; Pimenov DY; Giasin K; Prajapati P; Chaudhari R; Wojciechowski S
Materials (Basel); 2021 Dec; 14(23):. PubMed ID: 34885563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Novel Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model for Building Material Supplier Selection Based on Entropy-AHP Weighted TOPSIS.
Chen CH
Entropy (Basel); 2020 Feb; 22(2):. PubMed ID: 33286032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Identifying, evaluating and prioritizing the causes of occupational accidents in the construction industry using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS.
Abbasinia M; Mohammadfam I
Work; 2022; 72(3):933-940. PubMed ID: 35634821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluating modern intrusion detection methods in the face of Gen V multi-vector attacks with fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS.
Alhakami W
PLoS One; 2024; 19(5):e0302559. PubMed ID: 38743732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Determination of the most appropriate fertilizing method for apple trees using multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approaches.
Heidarisoltanabadi M; Elhami B; Imanmehr A; Khadivi A
Food Sci Nutr; 2024 Feb; 12(2):1158-1169. PubMed ID: 38370082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The use of multi-criteria decision making models in evaluating anesthesia method options in circumcision surgery.
Hancerliogullari G; Hancerliogullari KO; Koksalmis E
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2017 Jan; 17(1):14. PubMed ID: 28114944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development of fuzzy multi-criteria approach to prioritize locations of treated wastewater use considering climate change scenarios.
Chung ES; Kim Y
J Environ Manage; 2014 Dec; 146():505-516. PubMed ID: 25218330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evolved distance measures for circular intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their exploitation in the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solutions.
Chen TY
Artif Intell Rev; 2023; 56(7):7347-7401. PubMed ID: 36536928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multi-criteria decision support framework for sustainable implementation of effective green supply chain management practices.
Boutkhoum O; Hanine M; Boukhriss H; Agouti T; Tikniouine A
Springerplus; 2016; 5(1):664. PubMed ID: 27350904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Application of an integrated multi-criteria decision making AHP-TOPSIS methodology for ETL software selection.
Hanine M; Boutkhoum O; Tikniouine A; Agouti T
Springerplus; 2016; 5():263. PubMed ID: 27006872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Regional Water Resources Security Evaluation Based on a Hybrid Fuzzy BWM-TOPSIS Method.
Tu Y; Chen K; Wang H; Li Z
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Jul; 17(14):. PubMed ID: 32664379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Integrated AHP-TOPSIS under a Fuzzy Environment for the Selection of Waste-To-Energy Technologies in Ghana: A Performance Analysis and Socio-Enviro-Economic Feasibility Study.
Afrane S; Ampah JD; Agyekum EB; Amoh PO; Yusuf AA; Fattah IMR; Agbozo E; Elgamli E; Shouran M; Mao G; Kamel S
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jul; 19(14):. PubMed ID: 35886280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cobot selection using hybrid AHP-TOPSIS based multi-criteria decision making technique for fuel filter assembly process.
C S; Subramaniam SK
Heliyon; 2024 Feb; 10(4):e26374. PubMed ID: 38390129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
