These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38934589)
1. Comparative evaluation of the STANDARD M10 and Xpert Lee H-W; Yu H-J; Kim H; Yun SA; Suh E; Kang M; Kim TY; Huh HJ; Lee NY J Clin Microbiol; 2024 Jul; 62(7):e0052424. PubMed ID: 38934589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of cobas® Liat® Cdiff, STANDARD™ M10 C. difficile and Xpert® C. difficile BT assays for rapid detection of toxigenic Clostridioides difficile. Suominen J; Korhonen S; Kutvonen H; Jarva H; Pätäri-Sampo A; Loginov R J Microbiol Methods; 2024 Nov; 226():107043. PubMed ID: 39277020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clostridium difficile testing in the clinical laboratory by use of multiple testing algorithms. Novak-Weekley SM; Marlowe EM; Miller JM; Cumpio J; Nomura JH; Vance PH; Weissfeld A J Clin Microbiol; 2010 Mar; 48(3):889-93. PubMed ID: 20071552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection: Comparison of Techlab C. diff Quik Chek Complete, Xpert C. difficile, and multistep algorithmic approach. Seo JY; Jeong JH; Kim KH; Ahn JY; Park PW; Seo YH J Clin Lab Anal; 2017 Nov; 31(6):. PubMed ID: 28177534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Detection of Senok AC; Aldosari KM; Alowaisheq RA; Abid OA; Alsuhaibani KA; Khan MA; Somily AM Saudi J Gastroenterol; 2017; 23(4):259-262. PubMed ID: 28721981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the fully automated BD MAX Cdiff and Xpert C. difficile assays for direct detection of Clostridium difficile in stool specimens. Dalpke AH; Hofko M; Zorn M; Zimmermann S J Clin Microbiol; 2013 Jun; 51(6):1906-8. PubMed ID: 23515539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of tcdB real-time PCR in a three-step diagnostic algorithm for detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile. Larson AM; Fung AM; Fang FC J Clin Microbiol; 2010 Jan; 48(1):124-30. PubMed ID: 19923482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of strain type on detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile: comparison of molecular diagnostic and enzyme immunoassay approaches. Tenover FC; Novak-Weekley S; Woods CW; Peterson LR; Davis T; Schreckenberger P; Fang FC; Dascal A; Gerding DN; Nomura JH; Goering RV; Akerlund T; Weissfeld AS; Baron EJ; Wong E; Marlowe EM; Whitmore J; Persing DH J Clin Microbiol; 2010 Oct; 48(10):3719-24. PubMed ID: 20702676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Simultaneous Detection of Yoo IY; Song DJ; Huh HJ; Lee NY Ann Lab Med; 2019 Mar; 39(2):214-217. PubMed ID: 30430786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile: comparison of the cell culture neutralization, Xpert C. difficile, Xpert C. difficile/Epi, and Illumigene C. difficile assays. Pancholi P; Kelly C; Raczkowski M; Balada-Llasat JM J Clin Microbiol; 2012 Apr; 50(4):1331-5. PubMed ID: 22278839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Evaluation of the Performance of C. Diff Quik Chek Complete and Toxin A + B (Clostridium difficile) DUO Diagnostic Tests Compared with Toxigenic Culture in the Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile Infection. Yazisiz H; Özyurt ÖK; Öngüt G; Baysan BÖ; Dönmez L; Günseren F; Çolak D; Öğünç D Clin Lab; 2020 Apr; 66(4):. PubMed ID: 32255305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Algorithm combining toxin immunoassay and stool culture for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection. Shin BM; Kuak EY; Lee EJ; Songer JG J Clin Microbiol; 2009 Sep; 47(9):2952-6. PubMed ID: 19625481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the performance of C. DIFF QUIK CHEK COMPLETE and its usefulness in a hospital setting with a high prevalence of Clostridium difficile infection. Chung HS; Lee M J Investig Med; 2017 Jan; 65(1):88-92. PubMed ID: 27625418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Performances of the BD MAX™ CDIFF assay for the detection of toxigenic Clostridioides difficile using Cary-Blair preserved samples. Anne-Gaëlle R; Célia S; Jeanne C; Frédéric B; Anne T; Coralie B; Kevin S; Sonia F; Pascaline D; Francois V; Olivier D; Fréderic L Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2022 Jul; 103(3):115701. PubMed ID: 35596982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of a rapid membrane enzyme immunoassay for the simultaneous detection of glutamate dehydrogenase and toxin for the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection. Kim H; Kim WH; Kim M; Jeong SH; Lee K Ann Lab Med; 2014 May; 34(3):235-9. PubMed ID: 24790912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnosing Clostridioides difficile infections with molecular diagnostics: multicenter evaluation of revogene C. difficile assay. Sambri V; Gateau C; Zannoli S; Dirani G; Couturier J; Op den Buijs I; Roymans R; Hallet E; Arnold M; Zumoberhaus A; Steiner S; van de Bovenkamp J; Altwegg M; Berlinger L; Barbut F; Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2020 Jun; 39(6):1169-1175. PubMed ID: 32062723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of Diagnostic Algorithms for Detecting Toxigenic Clostridium difficile in Routine Practice at a Tertiary Referral Hospital in Korea. Moon HW; Kim HN; Hur M; Shim HS; Kim H; Yun YM PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0161139. PubMed ID: 27532104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the cobas Cdiff Test for Detection of Toxigenic Clostridium difficile in Stool Samples. Peterson LR; Young SA; Davis TE; Wang ZX; Duncan J; Noutsios C; Liesenfeld O; Osiecki JC; Lewinski MA J Clin Microbiol; 2017 Dec; 55(12):3426-3436. PubMed ID: 28954901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The diagnostic performance and accuracy of 3 molecular assays for the detection of Clostridium difficile in stool samples, compared with the Xpert® C. difficile assay. Azrad M; Tkhawkho L; Hamo Z; Peretz A J Microbiol Methods; 2020 Jan; 168():105784. PubMed ID: 31758952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]