These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38934640)

  • 1. Rejecting small! Accepting larger? Optimizing the font size of Chinese characters basing legibility and visual fatigue in OST-HMDs.
    Gu Z; Bao X; Zhu Y; Wang Q; Gao W; Wang D; Tian Y; Li Y
    Ergonomics; 2024 Jun; ():1-14. PubMed ID: 38934640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of font size, stroke, and background on the legibility of Chinese characters in virtual reality for the elderly.
    Chen Y; Huang G; Wang K
    Ergonomics; 2024 Aug; ():1-11. PubMed ID: 39154211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of age, viewing distance, display type, font type, colour contrast and number of syllables on the legibility of Korean characters.
    Kong YK; Lee I; Jung MC; Song YW
    Ergonomics; 2011 May; 54(5):453-65. PubMed ID: 21547790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Text legibility and the letter superiority effect.
    Sheedy JE; Subbaram MV; Zimmerman AB; Hayes JR
    Hum Factors; 2005; 47(4):797-815. PubMed ID: 16553067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Applying image descriptors to the assessment of legibility in Chinese characters.
    Chi CF; Cai D; You M
    Ergonomics; 2003 Jun; 46(8):825-41. PubMed ID: 12745981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Equivalent legibility font size for traditional Chinese character compared to early treatment diabetic retinopathy study near visual acuity.
    Wang CY; Shen EP; Wu SY; Hsu WC
    Taiwan J Ophthalmol; 2022; 12(1):68-73. PubMed ID: 35399968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [A comparison of Chinese reading parameters among rapid serial visual presentation, full screen and printed displays].
    Wang CX; Lü F; Xu D; Chen J; Xie RZ; Zhu L; Qu J
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Aug; 43(8):704-8. PubMed ID: 18001567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Legibility variations of Chinese characters and implications for visual acuity measurement in Chinese reading population.
    Zhang JY; Zhang T; Xue F; Liu L; Yu C
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 May; 48(5):2383-90. PubMed ID: 17460306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perceptual span is independent of font size for older and young readers: Evidence from Chinese.
    Xie F; Wang J; Hao L; Zhang X; Warrington KL
    Psychol Aging; 2020 Nov; 35(7):1026-1040. PubMed ID: 32584070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Do readers use character information when programming return-sweep saccades?
    Vasilev MR; Adedeji VI; Laursen C; Budka M; Slattery TJ
    Vision Res; 2021 Jun; 183():30-40. PubMed ID: 33652273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of display curvature, display zone, and task duration on legibility and visual fatigue during visual search task.
    Park S; Choi D; Yi J; Lee S; Lee JE; Choi B; Lee S; Kyung G
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Apr; 60():183-193. PubMed ID: 28166877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Study on legibility of characters for the elderly--effects of character display modes on legibility.
    Tomioka K
    J Physiol Anthropol; 2007 Mar; 26(2):159-64. PubMed ID: 17435359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Selection of Chinese characters for visual acuity charts using psychophysical methods].
    Wang CX; Lü F
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Jul; 47(7):618-22. PubMed ID: 22041487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Towards a standardisation of reading charts: Font effects on reading performance-Times New Roman with serifs versus the sans serif font Helvetica.
    Daxer B; Radner W; Radner M; Benesch T; Ettl A
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2022 Nov; 42(6):1180-1186. PubMed ID: 35972034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How to design font size for older adults: A systematic literature review with a mobile device.
    Hou G; Anicetus U; He J
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():931646. PubMed ID: 35978796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of luminance contrast, colour combinations, font, and search time on brand icon legibility.
    Ko YH
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Nov; 65():33-40. PubMed ID: 28802453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of visual crowding, text size, and positional uncertainty on text legibility at a glance.
    Dobres J; Wolfe B; Chahine N; Reimer B
    Appl Ergon; 2018 Jul; 70():240-246. PubMed ID: 29866314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Smaller visual angles show greater benefit of letter boldness than larger visual angles.
    Beier S; Oderkerk CAT
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Aug; 199():102904. PubMed ID: 31421483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Legibility difference between e-books and paper books by using an eye tracker.
    Kim JY; Min SN; Subramaniyam M; Cho YJ
    Ergonomics; 2014; 57(7):1102-8. PubMed ID: 24758176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Legibility Assessment of Visual Word Form Symbols for Visual Tests.
    Tsai LT; Jang Y; Liao KM; Chen CC
    Sci Rep; 2019 Mar; 9(1):3338. PubMed ID: 30833715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.