These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38934643)

  • 1. Annotation-preserving machine translation of English corpora to validate Dutch clinical concept extraction tools.
    Seinen TM; Kors JA; van Mulligen EM; Rijnbeek PR
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2024 Aug; 31(8):1725-1734. PubMed ID: 38934643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A multilingual gold-standard corpus for biomedical concept recognition: the Mantra GSC.
    Kors JA; Clematide S; Akhondi SA; van Mulligen EM; Rebholz-Schuhmann D
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2015 Sep; 22(5):948-56. PubMed ID: 25948699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Inventory of tools for Dutch clinical language processing.
    Cornet R; Van Eldik A; De Keizer N
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2012; 180():245-9. PubMed ID: 22874189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Exploiting and assessing multi-source data for supervised biomedical named entity recognition.
    Galea D; Laponogov I; Veselkov K
    Bioinformatics; 2018 Jul; 34(14):2474-2482. PubMed ID: 29538614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Generation of silver standard concept annotations from biomedical texts with special relevance to phenotypes.
    Oellrich A; Collier N; Smedley D; Groza T
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(1):e0116040. PubMed ID: 25607983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Automated content analysis across six languages.
    Windsor LC; Cupit JG; Windsor AJ
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(11):e0224425. PubMed ID: 31747404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Task definition, annotated dataset, and supervised natural language processing models for symptom extraction from unstructured clinical notes.
    Steinkamp JM; Bala W; Sharma A; Kantrowitz JJ
    J Biomed Inform; 2020 Feb; 102():103354. PubMed ID: 31838210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pooling annotated corpora for clinical concept extraction.
    Wagholikar KB; Torii M; Jonnalagadda SR; Liu H
    J Biomed Semantics; 2013 Jan; 4(1):3. PubMed ID: 23294871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. NCBI disease corpus: a resource for disease name recognition and concept normalization.
    Doğan RI; Leaman R; Lu Z
    J Biomed Inform; 2014 Feb; 47():1-10. PubMed ID: 24393765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of Three English-to-Dutch Machine Translations of SNOMED CT Procedures.
    Cornet R; Hill C; de Keizer N
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2017; 245():848-852. PubMed ID: 29295219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Machine vs. Radiologist-Based Translations of RadLex: Implications for Multi-language Report Interoperability.
    Park CJ; Yi PH; Al Yousif H; Wang KC
    J Digit Imaging; 2022 Jun; 35(3):660-665. PubMed ID: 35166969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Web 2.0-based crowdsourcing for high-quality gold standard development in clinical natural language processing.
    Zhai H; Lingren T; Deleger L; Li Q; Kaiser M; Stoutenborough L; Solti I
    J Med Internet Res; 2013 Apr; 15(4):e73. PubMed ID: 23548263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The translation teaching platform based on multilingual corpora of Xi Jinping: The Governance of China: Design, resources and applications.
    Kaibao H; Afzaal M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2024 Feb; 242():104110. PubMed ID: 38086170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Data extraction from machine-translated versus original language randomized trial reports: a comparative study.
    Balk EM; Chung M; Chen ML; Chang LK; Trikalinos TA
    Syst Rev; 2013 Nov; 2():97. PubMed ID: 24199894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An annotated corpus with nanomedicine and pharmacokinetic parameters.
    Lewinski NA; Jimenez I; McInnes BT
    Int J Nanomedicine; 2017; 12():7519-7527. PubMed ID: 29066897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An Extensible Evaluation Framework Applied to Clinical Text Deidentification Natural Language Processing Tools: Multisystem and Multicorpus Study.
    Heider PM; Meystre SM
    J Med Internet Res; 2024 May; 26():e55676. PubMed ID: 38805692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Concept annotation in the CRAFT corpus.
    Bada M; Eckert M; Evans D; Garcia K; Shipley K; Sitnikov D; Baumgartner WA; Cohen KB; Verspoor K; Blake JA; Hunter LE
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 Jul; 13():161. PubMed ID: 22776079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of Translation on Biomedical Information Extraction: Experiment on Real-Life Clinical Notes.
    Gérardin C; Xiong Y; Wajsbürt P; Carrat F; Tannier X
    JMIR Med Inform; 2024 Apr; 12():e49607. PubMed ID: 38596859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Enhancing clinical concept extraction with distributional semantics.
    Jonnalagadda S; Cohen T; Wu S; Gonzalez G
    J Biomed Inform; 2012 Feb; 45(1):129-40. PubMed ID: 22085698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of "off-the-shelf" information extraction algorithms in clinical informatics: A feasibility study of MetaMap annotation of Italian medical notes.
    Chiaramello E; Pinciroli F; Bonalumi A; Caroli A; Tognola G
    J Biomed Inform; 2016 Oct; 63():22-32. PubMed ID: 27444186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.