115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38934748)
1. A Comparison of Preparation Times between Manual, Rotary, and Reciprocating Files in Primary Molar Pulpectomy.
Middleton I; Vorster M; van der Vyver PJ
Indian J Dent Res; 2024 Jan; 35(1):45-48. PubMed ID: 38934748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of Glide Path Preparation on the Canal Shaping Times of WaveOne Gold in Curved Mandibular Molar Canals.
Vorster M; van der Vyver PJ; Paleker F
J Endod; 2018 May; 44(5):853-855. PubMed ID: 29550012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of Different Glide Path Files on Apical Debris Extrusion in Curved Root Canals.
Gunes B; Yesildal Yeter K
J Endod; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1191-1194. PubMed ID: 29884338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A micro-computed tomography-based comparison of the canal transportation and centering ability of ProTaper Universal rotary and WaveOne reciprocating files.
McRay B; Cox TC; Cohenca N; Johnson JD; Paranjpe A
Quintessence Int; 2014 Feb; 45(2):101-8. PubMed ID: 24389561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of Apical Extrusion of Bacteria After Glide Path Preparation Between Manual K File, One G Rotary, and WaveOne Gold Glider Reciprocation Preparations.
Low N; Zhen Jie S; Bhatia S; Davamani F; Nagendrababu V
Eur Endod J; 2021 Aug; 6(2):221-225. PubMed ID: 34650017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Effect of Different Molar Access Cavity Designs on Root Canal Shaping Times Using Rotation and Reciprocation Instruments in Mandibular First Molars.
Vorster M; van der Vyver PJ; Markou G
J Endod; 2022 Jul; 48(7):887-892. PubMed ID: 35398439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Glide Path Enlargement of Mandibular Molar Canals by Using K-files, the ProGlider File, and G-Files: A Comparative Study of the Preparation Times.
Paleker F; van der Vyver PJ
J Endod; 2017 Apr; 43(4):609-612. PubMed ID: 28190589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Canal Transportation and Centering Ability of WaveOne Gold in Combination with and without Different Glide Path Techniques.
Vorster M; van der Vyver PJ; Paleker F
J Endod; 2018 Sep; 44(9):1430-1435. PubMed ID: 30078574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative evaluation of hand and rotary file systems on dentinal microcrack formation during pulpectomy procedure in primary teeth: an in vitro study.
Nisar P; Katge F; Chimata VK; Pradhan D; Patil D; Agrawal I
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2024 Apr; 25(2):181-189. PubMed ID: 38461490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Root Canal Shaping Using Nickel Titanium, M-Wire, and Gold Wire: A Micro-computed Tomographic Comparative Study of One Shape, ProTaper Next, and WaveOne Gold Instruments in Maxillary First Molars.
van der Vyver PJ; Paleker F; Vorster M; de Wet FA
J Endod; 2019 Jan; 45(1):62-67. PubMed ID: 30446405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Canal transportation and centering ability of root canals prepared using rotary and reciprocating systems with and without PathFiles in cone-beam computed tomography-based three-dimensional molar prototypes.
Sunildath MS; Mathew J; George L; Vineet RV; Thomas P; John D
J Conserv Dent; 2021; 24(3):246-251. PubMed ID: 35035149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Volumetric Analysis of Hand and Rotary Instrumentation, Root Canal Filling Techniques, and Obturation Materials in Primary Teeth Using Spiral CT.
Yadav DBU; Varma RB; Kumar JS; Kumaran P; Xavier AM; Venugopal M; Thankappan N
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2024 Mar; 25(3):250-259. PubMed ID: 38690699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Shaping potential of manual NiTi K-File and rotary ProTaper and analyzing the final outcome of shaped canals using CT.
Kakar S; Dhingra A; Sharma H
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 May; 14(3):451-5. PubMed ID: 24171988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of glide paths created with K-files, PathFiles, and the ProGlider file, and their effects on subsequent WaveOne preparation in curved canals.
Zheng L; Ji X; Li C; Zuo L; Wei X
BMC Oral Health; 2018 Aug; 18(1):152. PubMed ID: 30157822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of quality of obturation and post-operative pain using manual vs rotary files in primary teeth - A randomised clinical trial.
Divya S; Jeevanandan G; Sujatha S; Subramanian EMG; Ravindran V
Indian J Dent Res; 2019; 30(6):904-908. PubMed ID: 31939369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper.
Bürklein S; Hinschitza K; Dammaschke T; Schäfer E
Int Endod J; 2012 May; 45(5):449-61. PubMed ID: 22188401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative Evaluation of Cleaning Capacity and Efficiency of Kedo-S Pediatric Rotary Files, Rotary ProTaper, and Hand K Files in Primary Molar Pulpectomy.
Kalita S; Agarwal N; Jabin Z; Anand A
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2021; 14(3):383-387. PubMed ID: 34720511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the efficacy of rotary vs. hand files in root canal preparation of primary teeth in vitro using CBCT.
Musale PK; Mujawar SA
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2014 Apr; 15(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 23893606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The influence of a manual glide path on the separation rate of NiTi rotary instruments.
Patiño PV; Biedma BM; Liébana CR; Cantatore G; Bahillo JG
J Endod; 2005 Feb; 31(2):114-6. PubMed ID: 15671822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical evaluation of instrumentation time and quality of obturation using paediatric hand and rotary file systems with conventional hand K-files for pulpectomy in primary mandibular molars: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial.
Priyadarshini P; Jeevanandan G; Govindaraju L; Subramanian EMG
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2020 Dec; 21(6):693-701. PubMed ID: 32185634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
