127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38934917)
1. Negativity bias in intergroup contact: Meta-analytical evidence that bad is stronger than good, especially when people have the opportunity and motivation to opt out of contact.
Paolini S; Gibbs M; Sales B; Anderson D; McIntyre K
Psychol Bull; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38934917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dynamic contact effects: Individuals' positive and negative contact history influences intergroup contact effects in a behavioral game.
Schäfer SJ; Simsek M; Jaspers E; Kros M; Hewstone M; Schmid K; Fell BF; Dorrough AR; Glöckner A; Christ O
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2022 Jul; 123(1):107-122. PubMed ID: 34582243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bad Is Stronger Than Good for Stigmatized, but Not Admired Outgroups: Meta-Analytical Tests of Intergroup Valence Asymmetry in Individual-to-Group Generalization Experiments.
Paolini S; McIntyre K
Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2019 Feb; 23(1):3-47. PubMed ID: 29473444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory.
Pettigrew TF; Tropp LR
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2006 May; 90(5):751-83. PubMed ID: 16737372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intergroup contact is reliably associated with reduced prejudice, even in the face of group threat and discrimination.
Van Assche J; Swart H; Schmid K; Dhont K; Al Ramiah A; Christ O; Kauff M; Rothmann S; Savelkoul M; Tausch N; Wölfer R; Zahreddine S; Saleem M; Hewstone M
Am Psychol; 2023 Sep; 78(6):761-774. PubMed ID: 36892922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Emotions in Intergroup Contact: Incidental and Integral Emotions' Effects on Interethnic Bias Are Moderated by Emotion Applicability and Subjective Agency.
Paolini S; Harwood J; Logatchova A; Rubin M; Mackiewicz M
Front Psychol; 2021; 12():588944. PubMed ID: 34122208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Meta-analysis of the "ironic" effects of intergroup contact.
Reimer NK; Sengupta NK
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2023 Feb; 124(2):362-380. PubMed ID: 35849365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Contextual effect of positive intergroup contact on outgroup prejudice.
Christ O; Schmid K; Lolliot S; Swart H; Stolle D; Tausch N; Al Ramiah A; Wagner U; Vertovec S; Hewstone M
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Mar; 111(11):3996-4000. PubMed ID: 24591627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The benefit of contact for prejudice-prone individuals: The type of stigmatized outgroup matters.
Maunder RD; Day SC; White FA
J Soc Psychol; 2020; 160(1):92-104. PubMed ID: 30995889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Gene × environment interaction on intergroup bias: the role of 5-HTTLPR and perceived outgroup threat.
Cheon BK; Livingston RW; Hong YY; Chiao JY
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2014 Sep; 9(9):1268-75. PubMed ID: 23887814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Meta-humanization reduces prejudice, even under high intergroup threat.
Pavetich M; Stathi S
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2021 Mar; 120(3):651-671. PubMed ID: 32700957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Differential relationships between intergroup contact and affective and cognitive dimensions of prejudice.
Tropp LR; Pettigrew TF
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2005 Aug; 31(8):1145-58. PubMed ID: 16000274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Exaggerated meta-perceptions predict intergroup hostility between American political partisans.
Moore-Berg SL; Ankori-Karlinsky LO; Hameiri B; Bruneau E
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Jun; 117(26):14864-14872. PubMed ID: 32527858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How can intergroup interaction be bad if intergroup contact is good? Exploring and reconciling an apparent paradox in the science of intergroup relations.
MacInnis CC; Page-Gould E
Perspect Psychol Sci; 2015 May; 10(3):307-27. PubMed ID: 25987510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Feeling in with the outgroup: outgroup acceptance and the internalization of the motivation to respond without prejudice.
Kunstman JW; Plant EA; Zielaskowski K; LaCosse J
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Sep; 105(3):443-57. PubMed ID: 23750814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Replicating and extending Sengupta et al. (2023): Contact predicts no within-person longitudinal outgroup-bias change.
Hodson G; Meleady R
Am Psychol; 2024 Apr; 79(3):451-462. PubMed ID: 37956050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intergroup contact theory.
Pettigrew TF
Annu Rev Psychol; 1998; 49():65-85. PubMed ID: 15012467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or 'at risk' young people: A systematic review.
Muir D; Orlando C; Newton B
Campbell Syst Rev; 2024 Jun; 20(2):e1406. PubMed ID: 38873396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dealing With Increasing Negativity Toward Refugees: A Latent Growth Curve Study of Positive and Negative Intergroup Contact and Approach-Avoidance Tendencies.
Bagci SC; Baysu G; Tercan M; Turnuklu A
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2023 Oct; 49(10):1466-1478. PubMed ID: 35856466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
