These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3893610)

  • 1. The old and the new: a study of five contrast media for urography.
    Davies P; Panto PN; Buckley J; Richardson RE
    Br J Radiol; 1985 Jul; 58(691):593-7. PubMed ID: 3893610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contrast agent induced thrombophlebitis following leg phlebography: iopamidol versus meglumine iothalamate.
    Lea Thomas M; Keeling FP; Piaggio RB; Treweeke PS
    Br J Radiol; 1984 Mar; 57(675):205-7. PubMed ID: 6365232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Quality control in urography using non-ionic contrast media (iopamidol) and induced hydration].
    Stacul F; Bazzocchi M; Zanella F; Abbona M
    Radiol Med; 1986 Mar; 72(3):138-41. PubMed ID: 3704214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Comparison of the side effects of urographic contrast media (iothalamate, diatrizoate, iodamide, iopamidol) within the scope of a CT study].
    Stellamor K; Hruby W; Assinger S; Luckner H
    Radiologe; 1984 Oct; 24(10):488-90. PubMed ID: 6505221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A large trial of intravenous Conray 325 and Niopam 300 to assess immediate and delayed reactions.
    McCullough M; Davies P; Richardson R
    Br J Radiol; 1989 Mar; 62(735):260-5. PubMed ID: 2649192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Iopamidol: new, nonionic contrast agent for excretory urography.
    Thompson WM; Foster WL; Halvorsen RA; Dunnick NR; Rommel AJ; Bates M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1984 Feb; 142(2):329-32. PubMed ID: 6607602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intravenous urography with low-osmolality contrast agents: theoretical considerations and clinical findings.
    Dawson P; Heron C; Marshall J
    Clin Radiol; 1984 May; 35(3):173-5. PubMed ID: 6713791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Comparison between ionic and non ionic contrast media in fast injection nephro-urography (author's transl)].
    Dalla Palma L; Rossi M; Stacul F; Agostini R
    Radiol Med; 1981; 67(1-2):55-60. PubMed ID: 7268075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Iopamidol compared with Conray in peripheral angiography.
    Wojciechowski J; Johansson R; Björk L
    Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1982; 23(6):549-52. PubMed ID: 6763456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative radiological studies of Uromiro and Urografin as contrast media for excretion urography.
    Adamali N; Raja R
    East Afr Med J; 1979 Nov; 56(11):593-6. PubMed ID: 520238
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparative trial of two urographic contrast media - Conray 420 and Urografin 370.
    Eyes BE; Evans AF; Whitehouse GH
    Australas Radiol; 1981 Jul; 25(2):150-6. PubMed ID: 7305784
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Excretory urography--current indications of the status of a conventional diagnostic method. Status of nonionic and ionic contrast media].
    Porst H; Mayer R
    Fortschr Med; 1985 Aug; 103(30):755-8. PubMed ID: 4043912
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Iopamidol in urography. A comparison between ionic and nonionic contrast media in patients with normal and impaired renal function.
    Dalla Palma L; Rossi M; Stacul F; Agostini R
    Urol Radiol; 1982; 4(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 7101596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative study of the sodium salts of iodamide and iothalamate in clinical urography.
    Owen JP; Keir MJ; Lamballe AK; Laker MF; Fitzjohn TP; Wilsdon JB; Murray A; Campbell RW
    Clin Radiol; 1983 May; 34(3):353-7. PubMed ID: 6839661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Contrast media for left ventricular angiography. A comparison between Cardio-Conray and iopamidol.
    Gwilt DJ; Nagle RE
    Br Heart J; 1984 Apr; 51(4):427-30. PubMed ID: 6200129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative study of the methylglucamine salts of iodamide and iothalamate in clinical urography.
    Owen JP; Keir MJ; Nair KV; Lauckner D; Wilsdon JB
    Clin Radiol; 1981 May; 32(3):341-6. PubMed ID: 7237916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical cardiovascular experiences with iopamidol: a new non-ionic contrast medium.
    Partridge JB; Robinson PJ; Turnbull CM; Stoker JB; Boyle RM; Morrison GW
    Clin Radiol; 1981 Jul; 32(4):451-5. PubMed ID: 6972848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. MEGLUMINE IOTHALAMATE 60 PER CENT AND SODIUM DIATRIZOATE 50 PER CENT. COMPARISON OF UROGRAPHIC QUALITY AND SIDE-EFFECTS.
    DOTTER CT; JUDKINS MP
    Radiology; 1964 Feb; 82():225. PubMed ID: 14115299
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of tri-iodoisophthaldiamide with meglumine lothalamate in phlebography of the leg.
    Thomas ML; Briggs GM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1982 Apr; 138(4):725-7. PubMed ID: 7039276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inhibition of platelet function by contrast media: iopamidol and ioxaglate versus iothalamate. Work in progress.
    Rao AK; Rao VM; Willis J; Beckett C; Steiner RM
    Radiology; 1985 Aug; 156(2):311-3. PubMed ID: 4011893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.