These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3893610)

  • 21. Iopamidol and Conray 60: comparison in superselective angiography.
    Schonfeld SM; Pinto RS; Schonfeld AR; Berenstein A; Manuell M; Kricheff II
    Radiology; 1984 Sep; 152(3):809-11. PubMed ID: 6379748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Safety of contrast media in cerebral angiography: iopamidol vs. methylglucamine iothalamate.
    Bird CR; Drayer BP; Velaj R; Triolo PJ; Allen S; Bates M; Yeates AE; Heinz ER; Osborne DR
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1984; 5(6):801-3. PubMed ID: 6437183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Double-blind comparison of iodamide and diatrizoate for excretory urography.
    Rosenfield AT; Putman CE; Ulreich S; Koss N
    Yale J Biol Med; 1977; 50(6):631-6. PubMed ID: 345632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Preliminary clinical studies with a new non-ionic contrast medium (Iopamidol) in intravenous pyelography].
    Miyakawa M; Yoshida O
    Hinyokika Kiyo; 1984 Mar; 30(3):431-5. PubMed ID: 6380240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. CLINICAL EVALUATION OF SODIUM IOTHALAMATE 66.8 PER CENT (CONRAY-400).
    MARSHALL TR; LING JT; BUCHANAN J
    Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med; 1964 Sep; 92():676-81. PubMed ID: 14217086
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Iodamide meglumine as a contrast medium for intravenous urography.
    Hare WS; Klempfner G; Lee EW
    Australas Radiol; 1985 May; 29(2):185-9. PubMed ID: 4062761
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparative neurotoxicity of angiographic contrast media.
    Velaj R; Drayer B; Albright R; Fram E
    Neurology; 1985 Sep; 35(9):1290-8. PubMed ID: 3927186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Iopamidol as contrast medium in endoscopic retrograde pancreatography: a prospective randomised comparison with diatrizoate.
    O'Connor HJ; Ellis WR; Manning AP; Lintott DJ; McMahon MJ; Axon AT
    Endoscopy; 1988 Sep; 20(5):244-7. PubMed ID: 3168937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Delayed reactions to urographic contrast media.
    Panto PN; Davies P
    Br J Radiol; 1986 Jan; 59(697):41-4. PubMed ID: 3947806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effect of ionic and nonionic contrast media on the sickling phenomenon.
    Rao VM; Rao AK; Steiner RM; Burka ER; Grainger RG; Ballas SK
    Radiology; 1982 Jul; 144(2):291-3. PubMed ID: 7089282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. NOTE ON INTRAVENOUS PYELOGRAPHY WITH 66.8 PER CENT SODIUM IOTHALAMATE; CONRAY-400, IODINE CONTENT 40 PER CENT.
    STEINBERG I; EVANS JA
    Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med; 1964 Aug; 92():267-9. PubMed ID: 14207569
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. In vitro effects of iodinated contrast media on the growth of staphylococci.
    Kim KS; Lachman R
    Invest Radiol; 1982; 17(3):305-9. PubMed ID: 7118519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Adverse reactions to high osmolarity contrast media. A comparative-prospective study].
    Urrutia M; Macharaviaya A; Rodríguez R
    Rev Med Panama; 1994 Jan; 19(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 7938712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Measurement of plasma contrast levels during excretory urography.
    Hunter TB; Thornbury JR; Silver TM; Medzihradsky F
    Invest Urol; 1977 Mar; 14(5):378-9. PubMed ID: 845001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Femoral artery flow and pain during lumbar aortography: comparison of ionic and non-ionic contrast media.
    Padayachee TS; Reidy JF; King DH; Reeves M; Gosling RG
    Clin Radiol; 1983 Jan; 34(1):79-85. PubMed ID: 6822042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Renal contrast radiography study in hypertensive patients: comparison of the nephrotoxicity of ionic and non-ionic contrast media].
    Mannella P; Tataranni G; Benea G; Logallo G; Farinelli A
    Radiol Med; 1983 Jun; 69(6):422-5. PubMed ID: 6665240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Product selection criteria for intravascular ionic contrast media.
    Swanson DP; Dick TJ; Simms SM; Thrall JH
    Clin Pharm; 1985; 4(5):527-38. PubMed ID: 3902331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A controlled study of Conray 60 (methyl glucamine iothalamate) as a pyelographic agent compared against Hypaque 50 (sodium diatrizoate).
    Leeming BW
    J Coll Radiol Australas; 1965 Oct; 9(3):247-51. PubMed ID: 5319824
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Plasma osmolality, iodine concentration and urographic images following high and low osmolar contrast media.
    Todd AW; Naisby GP; Owen JP; Smith PA; Butler TJ; Kelly PJ; Murthy LN; Robson JY; Laker MF
    Clin Radiol; 1991 May; 43(5):331-6. PubMed ID: 2036759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of iopamidol with three other contrast media in orbital venography/cavernous sinography.
    Macpherson P
    Br J Radiol; 1982 Jul; 55(655):539-40. PubMed ID: 7150905
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.